<entry id="2083448" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2806750</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>こいこい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1194690">花札</xref>
<field>&hanaf;</field>
<gloss>koi-koi (type of hanafuda game)</gloss>
<gloss>koi koi</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2014-01-30 06:57:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_refs>daijs</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-01-30 08:27:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>[expl] glosses are supplementary.  this needs a main gloss</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-01-31 00:25:12" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Short of summarizing the rules, I can't think of a better gloss.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%93%E3%81%84%E3%81%93%E3%81%84
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koi-Koi</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11 +11 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;card game played with a hanafuda deck&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;card game played with a hanafuda deck&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-01-31 10:06:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>I thought we had agreed expl didn't have to be supplimentary 
(per the mailing list discussion "When to use (brackets), 
[expl], [note=]"). since this IS an explanatory gloss, 
doesn't it make sense to tag it as such?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-02-04 22:42:05" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Well that wasn't my recollection. We discussed it in Sep/Oct last year, and I updated the Editorial Guidelines after that. See: http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#General
"on occasions the usual translation may be a bit opaque, and a more complete explanation would be helpful. In this case add a more explanatory gloss with "[expl]" in front of it. Keep these to a minimum (it's a dictionary; not an encyclopedia.) The "[expl]" tag is usually not used if it is the only gloss in the sense. "
The reason for the "expl" was distinguish between glosses that were translations
Since in this case "Koi-Koi" gets an English Wikipedia page, we can probably make that a gloss, and then an "expl" tag is appropriate.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -10 +10,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;card game played with a hanafuda deck&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;koi-koi&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;koi koi&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;card game played with a hanafuda deck&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-02-05 00:23:15" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-20 10:41:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -10 +10 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;koi-koi&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;koi-koi (type of hanafuda game)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;card game played with a hanafuda deck&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-21 00:30:22" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-10-06 07:43:00" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;hanaf;&lt;/field&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>