<entry id="2067691" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2106790</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>過ぎる</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>過る</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>よぎる</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&v5r;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>to go by</gloss>
<gloss>to cross</gloss>
<gloss>to pass by</gloss>
<gloss>to flash across</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2006-11-08 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-08 18:52:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>gg5 koj daij
only gg5 has 過ぎる</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5 +5 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;過ぎる&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;過る&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;過る&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;過ぎる&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;io;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-09 04:04:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think the older references are trying to distinguish between よぎる and すぎる, but the masses are treating 過ぎる as applying to both.
The point is that it's "uk".</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>過る	9575
過ぎる	3933038 &lt;- includes すぎる
As well as GG5, 過ぎる/よぎる is in the 中辞典, ルミナス and Grand Concise JEs, and the Nelson and S&amp;H kanwas.
Google counts: 過る + よぎる 4,270. 過ぎる + よぎる 268,000. (Not to be taken that seriously, but interesting figures.)</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5 +5 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;過る&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;過ぎる&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -8,2 +8 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;過ぎる&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;io;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;過る&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-09 08:31:39" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think you are right</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>G n-grams:
 頭をよぎった	63339
 頭を過った	 1894
 頭を過ぎった	 8243</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-09 14:19:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Currently the kanji 過 has the kun-readings
 す.ぎる, -す.ぎる, -す.ぎ, す.ごす, あやま.つ, あやま.ち, よ.ぎる
I propose changing this to
 す.ぎる, す.ごす, あやま.ち, あやま.つ, よ.ぎる, よぎ.る
The readings -す.ぎる, -す.ぎ are redundant.
(I think dashes should be reserved for readings that only are used as prefixes or suffixes, e.g. 雨: あめ, あま-, -さめ)
In principle あやま.ち is redundant, but considering the n-grams  (過ち 553735, 過つ 3284) I think あやま.ち is justified.
And よ.ぎる, よぎ.る are two distinct readings, both of them correct.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-05-10 07:09:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Done.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-05-05 22:24:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>koj, meikyo, 中辞典</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -19 +20 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to float across&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to flash across&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-05-05 23:51:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>