<entry id="2058247" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1318550</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>自発</keb>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf19</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>じはつ</reb>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf19</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1318560">自発的</xref>
<gloss>spontaneity</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&ling;</field>
<gloss>spontaneous passive</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-09-17 14:31:41" stat="A">
<upd_uid>paul</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Paul Blay</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Just an x-ref</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1318560"&gt;自発的&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-23 03:48:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>noun gloss. gg5 doesn't have a specific gloss for 自発 but has "spontaneousness; spontaneity" for 自発性.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;spontaneous&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;spontaneity&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-23 03:50:45" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-02-01 09:52:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_refs>https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%87%AA%E7%99%BA_(%E6%96%87%E6%B3%95)</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-02-02 20:31:57" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>???</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-02-03 00:29:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>自発 also has a grammatical meaning, similar to passive voice, but
different. I think this was made clear from the Wikipedia article. 
I don't understand what the gratuitous use of question marks is 
supposed to convey.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-02-03 10:30:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>called "spontaneous passive" in the paper 
"Grammar as Culture" by Masahiko Seto</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://ceas.yale.edu/sites/default/files/
files/events/past/20110611jltane_seto.pdf</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-02-05 00:07:49" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, a couple of other Japanese linguistics references call it that.
My earlier "???" was an attempt to elicit a more meaningful submission than a single URL of a Wikipedia page. The expectation is that submissions include a proposed amendment or at least a useful comment on what might/could/should be added or changed.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijr: 文法で、動作・作用が自然にまたはひとりでに実現する意を表す言い方。口語では助動詞「れる」「られる」、文語では「る」「らる」（古くは「ゆ」「らゆ」）を付けて言い表す。 
Marcus' reference: https://ceas.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/events/past/20110611jltane_seto.pdf</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;ling;&lt;/field&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;spontaneous passive&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>