<entry id="2056941" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2086640</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>し</reb>
<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&prt;</pos>
<pos>&conj;</pos>
<gloss>and</gloss>
<gloss>besides</gloss>
<gloss>moreover</gloss>
<gloss>what's more</gloss>
<gloss>not only ... but also</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&prt;</pos>
<pos>&conj;</pos>
<s_inf>usu. indicates one of several reasons</s_inf>
<gloss>because</gloss>
<gloss>since</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&prt;</pos>
<pos>&conj;</pos>
<s_inf>at sentence end; gives reason for an unstated but deducible conclusion</s_inf>
<gloss>the thing is</gloss>
<gloss>for one thing</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2006-06-04 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-07-03 13:40:12" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Jean-Luc Léger</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>the second sense is in fact entry 2542020, from a time when words written with a Jis 212 kanji wouldn't show up in edict.
We don't need this anymore.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,7 +13,0 @@
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;obsc;&lt;/misc&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;10^24 (kanji is JIS X 0212 kuten 4906)&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;septillion (American)&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;(obs) quadrillion (British)&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-07-05 08:51:56" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-01-21 22:24:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>Moving note from meaning into actual note.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;(at the end of a phrase) notes one (of several) reasons&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;at the end of a phrase&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;notes one (of several) reasons&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-01-21 23:54:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-01-22 01:21:42" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Expanding. We were missing a really common sense.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij, gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,2 +11,19 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;at the end of a phrase&lt;/s_inf&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;notes one (of several) reasons&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;and&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;besides&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;moreover&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;what's more&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;not only ... but also&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;conj;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;usu. indicates one of several reasons&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;because&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;since&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;conj;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;at sentence end; gives reason for an unstated but deducible conclusion&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;the thing is&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;for one thing&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-01-22 06:18:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-01-23 21:55:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>Behaves more like a conjuncitve than a particle as it relates sentences (or clauses) to each other but doesn't otherwise affect the meaning.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -18 +16,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -25 +22,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-01-23 22:54:08" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We have prt because the kokugos classify it as a 接続助詞 (conjunctive particle). I checked a few other 接続助詞 entries (ば、から、けれど、ながら, とも) and prt is on all of them (often as the only PoS).
Unlike regular conjunctives (接続詞), conjunctive particles are always attached to the previous word or clause (i.e. they can't start a sentence or clause).
Whether or not "[prt,conj]" is the best way to indicate this (if we want to maintain the distinction at all) is probably a topic for the mailing list. But for now, prt is fine.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -22,0 +25 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;prt;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-01-23 23:13:52" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>FWIW it has a section in Naoko Chino's "All About Particles".</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>