<entry id="2049709" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2094000</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>和名抄</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>倭名鈔</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>わみょうしょう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2094020">倭名類聚鈔・わみょうるいじゅしょう</xref>
<misc>&abbr;</misc>
<gloss>Wamyōruijushō (famous Heian-period Japanese dictionary)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2006-08-08 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-11 04:06:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Merging 2094010.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijr, Koj (merge).</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;倭名鈔&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2094020"&gt;倭名類聚鈔・わみょうるいじゅしょう&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-11 04:32:15" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-13 01:23:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>though topical, I think it's weird to have all these dictionaries as entries here rather than jmdict. it feels a little silly, actually.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Wamyoruijusho (famous Heian-period Japanese dictionary)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Wamyōruijushō (famous Heian-period Japanese dictionary)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-13 04:32:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We have good company for our silliness.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>大辞林:  わみょうしょう 【和名抄・倭名鈔】
「倭名類聚鈔わみようるいじゆしよう」の略。
広辞苑 ditto.</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-13 10:25:07" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>... but Daijirin has hundreds if not thousands of proper names in the 
dictionary. out of those thousands, jmdict has cherrypicked Japanese cities, 
foreign capitals, a handful of super famous people like Mozart, and... 
historical dictionaries? Isn't it a rather weird subset?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-13 11:51:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Weird? I don't think so. We try and keep to a consistent subset of proper names with the rest being in JMnedict/Enamdict. It would be silly to exclude all proper names, and a mess if we put in all 740,000 from JMnedict/Enamdict. The broad guidelines for enclusion are at http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Proper_Names</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-13 12:53:59" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>"Names of dictionaries" isn't mentioned in that list, so this should really be 
in the names dictionary according to policy.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-13 20:37:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Sigh.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>