<entry id="2049463" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1009690</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>に違いない</keb>
<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>にちがいない</reb>
<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<gloss>I am sure</gloss>
<gloss>no doubt that</gloss>
<gloss>must</gloss>
<gloss>must have (done)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2016-11-03 05:10:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>G n-grams:
に違いない	2123745
にちがいない	 194087</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-11-03 05:31:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-09 06:08:41" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>違いない is already an entry and I've suggested adding a note saying it's often "にちがいない". I feel an antipathy for 
entries that start with a particle that really are part of the preceding subject and even if it's not a policy, it's 
something we do already avoid in most cases. If we ever need to include entries like these, I think the criteria for 
inclusion shouldn't be how common the expression is, but rather whether the pared down entry (e.g. 違いない in this 
case) provides all the user might need to understand the expression or not. In this case, に違いない and 違いない are 
essentially the same entry so this doesn't seem necessary at all, to me.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-13 14:05:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Good points. It's something I'd like to discuss when I get back from travelling.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-20 22:18:40" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>close and reopen to clean up the queue.  see previous comments</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-20 22:18:52" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-24 02:42:57" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree that there's really not a case for having both 違いない and に違いない as entries.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>違いない	2351291
に違いない	2123745</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-31 03:56:34" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>One week on and no further comment. I'll approve the deletion.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-09 01:09:13" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Just adding a note that there were still about 240 Tanaka sentences indexed to this entry. I've changed them to 違いない.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>