JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1707720 Active (id: 2048740)
<entry id="2048740" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1707720</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>取り逃がす</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>取り逃す</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>取逃す</keb>
<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>とりにがす</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&v5s;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<gloss>to miss (capturing)</gloss>
<gloss>to fail to catch</gloss>
<gloss>to let slip</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-02-09 20:46:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nikolai Vavilov</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>取り逃がす is more frequently used and listed as the only spelling in most dictionaries.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>三省堂, 研究社, 明鏡国, 大辞泉</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5 +5 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;取り逃す&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;取り逃がす&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -8 +8 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;取り逃がす&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;取り逃す&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-10 00:08:21" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>ngrams

取り逃がす	484
取り逃す	149
取逃す	4</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-09-26 15:15:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Dine2019</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>複合動詞レキシコン says "とりのがす" is the same as "とりにがす"</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;とりのがす&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-09-27 10:09:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>A bit of a sweeping statement from the good people at NINJAL. No major reference has this and 逃がす/にがす and 逃す/のがす are not quite the same. I'd need to see a better case for this.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-09-29 00:29:01" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>temporarily removing to indicate 取逃す is [io]</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;io;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -15,3 +15,0 @@
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;とりのがす&lt;/reb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-09-29 00:29:27" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>readded.  however, i don't see the need without a better reference</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;とりのがす&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-09-29 10:18:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree. Let's drop it.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,3 +16,0 @@
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;とりのがす&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml