<entry id="1999273" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1140080</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>ランダム</reb>
<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>random</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1140090">ランダムサンプリング</xref>
<misc>&abbr;</misc>
<gloss>random sampling</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-03-23 12:09:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Added sense.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr/s</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1140090"&gt;ランダムサンプリング&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;abbr;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;random sampling&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-23 13:14:30" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-03-05 04:43:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Is there a reason this was "adj-na, n, adj-no"? I've seen this on a lot of older entries but I think it would make more sense to order 
the PoS together, e.g. "adj-na, adj-no, n" (where both really do apply).</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>9-ish tweets containing "ランダムなこと" past week
0 non-bot tweets for "ランダムのこと" same period</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-03-05 06:25:44" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Historical sloppy marking, really. A lot of people use の when it should really be な, but I think just adj-na is appropriate.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ランダムな	122305
ランダムの	29155</upd_refs>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>