<entry id="1996021" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1568280</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>楷書</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf37</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かいしょ</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf37</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>printed style (of writing Chinese characters)</gloss>
<gloss>square style</gloss>
<gloss>block style</gloss>
<gloss>standard style</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2019-01-25 11:10:53" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Aligning.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,3 +18,2 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="2524060"&gt;楷書体&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;square style of handwriting&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;printed style of handwriting&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;printed style (of writing Chinese characters)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;square style&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-01-25 22:46:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Some of the entries related to calligraphy refer to "Chinese characters" and others to "kanji". Can we settle on one or the other? I prefer "kanji" in the context of explaining Japanese terms, but I'm not fussed if we use the other.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-01-27 01:00:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think "kanji" is fine when the term relates specifically to Japanese but 楷書 doesn't so I prefer "Chinese characters" here.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-01-28 04:36:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. Let's stick to that.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>