<entry id="1993558" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1257270</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>嫌らしい</keb>
<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>厭らしい</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>いやらしい</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>やらしい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>unpleasant</gloss>
<gloss>disagreeable</gloss>
<gloss>nasty</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>lewd</gloss>
<gloss>lascivious</gloss>
<gloss>obscene</gloss>
<gloss>filthy</gloss>
<gloss>dirty</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-10-24 11:21:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Tim Gwinnett</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>'厭やらしい' fixed to the correct '厭らしい'</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Kanji dictionaries at jisho.org and www.jp41.com/kanji (both of which list the kunyomi as 'いや', rather than 'い'), IME input on my own Japanese laptop</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;厭やらしい&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;厭らしい&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-10-24 16:16:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>-both refs above are based on kanjidic, which is not helpful.  however, daijisen agrees: いや‐らし・い【嫌らしい／厭らしい】
-nikkoku has 嫌らしい[やらしい], so [nokanji] is unnecessary</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -19,1 +19,0 @@
-&lt;re_nokanji/&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-10-24 22:17:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-06-19 15:05:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Split general “disgusting” sense from specifically sexual one (as do dicts).</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 daijr koj</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,1 +23,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;unpleasant&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -25,0 +24,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;filthy&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -27,0 +27,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;unpleasant&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -28,0 +29,6 @@
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-i;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;lewd&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;lascivious&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -29,1 +36,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;lewd&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;obscene&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;filthy&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -31,1 +39,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;lascivious&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-06-20 04:44:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>pupchurch</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Paul Upchurch</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-12-11 09:16:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"disgusting" and "filthy" (for sense 1) don't mesh at all with my understanding of the word.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>chujiten</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,4 +22,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;disgusting&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;filthy&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;repulsive&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;detestable&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -28,0 +25 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;nasty&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -35 +31,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;indecent&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-12-12 06:57:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>