jmdict
2837471
Active
(id:
1993031)
<entry id="1993031" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2837471</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>温泉めぐり</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>温泉巡り</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>おんせんめぐり</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2512080">湯めぐり</xref>
<gloss>visiting multiple hot springs</gloss>
<gloss>onsen tour</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-12-05 14:33:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"visiting several onsen" is maybe better? than "onsens"? sounds/looks a little weird.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>lum gg5
温泉めぐり 100966
温泉巡り 70176
湯めぐり 215185
湯巡り 93662</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-12-05 21:26:05" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"Onsen" looks better to me.
Can we come up with a different gloss, though?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>visiting several onsens</gloss>
+<gloss>onsen tour</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-12-06 03:20:15" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, that looks better.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>