JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 2836679 Deleted (id: 1988057)
<entry id="1988057" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2836679</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>オア</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&conj;</pos>
<gloss>or</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-09-30 19:24:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>temp approve</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijs</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-30 19:26:01" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>this is part of a suggested split at 2289030.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-01 02:22:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't see any good reason why this should be split out from "OR". This is most commonly written as "or", and on occasion "OR", only seldom 
"オア"</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>In response to the comments at the "OR" entry: ”or/オア" is definitely used as a conjugation in Japanese and not just with gairaigo:
https://www.excite.co.jp/News/column_g/20161020/TokyoFm_rtuwMQUVut.html
"ご馳走してもらうならどっち?「寿司 or 焼肉」"
https://news.mynavi.jp/article/20180320-602464/
"朝食はパンorご飯? 一生1種だけならパンorご飯or麺? 朝食事情を1,005人に調査"
https://fortune.woman.excite.co.jp/menu/M6010019
"【好きor嫌い!?】あの人の態度が思わせぶりすぎて毎日ツラい"</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-01 12:43:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We could have both "or" and "OR" in the kanji field and put an OR restriction on the logical OR sense.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-03 02:16:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, I think Marcus has made a very good point about "or", etc. I propose we drop this version and put them back together with the restriction Robin suggested. If that's accepted this can be deleted.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-10-03 04:33:57" stat="D">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml