<entry id="1987361" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2218890</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>該当なし</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>該当無し</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>がいとうなし</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<gloss>not applicable</gloss>
<gloss>n/a</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2007-10-06 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-02-21 02:46:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>evidence of this being used prenominally to get adj-f status?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-f;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;exp;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-02-21 06:00:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It was submitted as "adj", so I must have made it "adj-f".該当無し get 200k+ hits.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;該当無し&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-19 10:19:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N/a</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;na&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;n/a&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-19 11:39:39" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I try and avoid "/" within glosses as it is used as the separator between glosses  in the EDICT editions, and clients often replace it with ";" and the like. I guess it's harmless that way, amd more apps are using the JMdict version now.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>