<entry id="1987136" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2835956</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>可愛がり</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かわいがり</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1190730">かわいがる・1</xref>
<gloss>doting</gloss>
<gloss>being affectionate (to)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1190730">かわいがる・4</xref>
<s_inf>used ironically; esp. in sports</s_inf>
<gloss>training harshly</gloss>
<gloss>tormenting</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-06-10 08:51:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>daijs</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-10 16:19:17" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-13 19:46:12" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Aligning x-refs.
A single word can't be considered an idiom, right?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1190730"&gt;かわいがる・1&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -15 +14 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;being affectionate&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;being affectionate (to)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -19,3 +18 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1190730"&gt;かわいがる・2&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1190730"&gt;かわいがる・2&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;id;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1190730"&gt;かわいがる・4&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-14 02:42:15" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think a single word can be used in an idiomatic fashion.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>