jmdict
2836302
Active
(id:
1984544)
<entry id="1984544" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2836302</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>数知れぬ</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かずしれぬ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2607310">数知れない・かずしれない</xref>
<gloss>countless</gloss>
<gloss>innumerable</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-07-20 15:03:12" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Readers+
G n-grams
数知れない 25541
数知れぬ 7111</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-07-20 19:07:37" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>we seem to have been inconsistent in how we record ~ぬ entries. daijr has this but without PoS. based on similarity on form, i'm copying our PoS for 人知れぬ, which we have as [adj-pn], which both shinmeikai and meikyo have and agree is 連体 (=adj-pn). however, daijr has 人知れぬ only as 連語.
we are not the only inconsistent ones in our treatment of ~ぬ, i think</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-pn;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>