<entry id="1983347" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2836158</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>通用音</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>つうようおん</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1932300">慣用音</xref>
<gloss>popularly accepted "on" reading of a kanji (as opposed to those derived from Chinese)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-06-22 11:29:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Refs redirect to 慣用音.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij, koj</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-22 23:43:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Should we be using quotation marks for on and kun for readings? If so there are about 8 other entries containing them.
We don't put other ローマ字 in quotes.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-23 16:47:01" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It might not be the best approach. I just think that "popularly accepted on reading" is somewhat confusing to read.
Are there any alternatives?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-25 18:44:57" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>temp approve</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-25 18:46:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i haven't looked at the other entries, but i agree that "on" could be confusing without the quotation marks.  i think we should standardize on:

"on" reading
  or
on-yomi / on'yomi</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-28 01:01:34" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK, let's use "on" when the gloss is otherwise a bit ambiguous. I'll go through and add them where I think it's needed. Something like:
重箱読み;重箱読(io) [じゅうばこよみ] /(n) (See 湯桶読み) mixed on-kun reading/
is probably OK.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>