<entry id="1982905" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2836117</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>果汁１００％のジュース</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>果汁１００パーセントのジュース</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かじゅうひゃくパーセントのジュース</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>100% fruit juice</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-06-18 04:04:12" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>gg5
13 hits past 24 hrs on twitter (for 果汁１００％のジュース)</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-18 13:09:37" stat="D" unap="true">
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-18 14:15:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It appears our friend is still at it with the deletion requests...
I actually agree in this case, though. This looks like a classic A+B example to me.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-19 00:12:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It is A+B, but we do usually include A+B when 
they are common/in other references. Both 
those conditions are fulfilled here.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>eij as well</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-19 22:45:44" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm inclined to wave it through. The second form is an example in the 果汁 entry in GG5, but the first leads in Googits.
Yes, I can understand it, but I probably wouldn't come up with it if asked how to say "100% fruit juice" in Japanese, probably because I tend to regard 果汁 and ジュース as synonyms. A lot of Japanese stock phrases  seem rather tautological and this is a typical one.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>