JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 2835947 Active (id: 1981609)
<entry id="1981609" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2835947</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>庶民金庫</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>しょみんきんこ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&obs;</misc>
<gloss>people's bank</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-06-10 02:21:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_refs>gg5</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-10 08:11:08" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Modern Japanese but an obsolete term. But we're not really meant to use [obs] for these kind of entries, are we?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>km ngrams
庶民金庫	7
庶民銀行	5
jawiki
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BA%B6%E6%B0%91%E9%87%91%E5%BA%AB
"庶民金庫(しょみんきんこ)は、中小企業・個人事業主およびサラリーマンに対して高利貸に代わる簡易な小規模融資を行う目的で、1938年
(昭和13年)に庶民金庫法(昭和13年3月31日法律第58号)により設立された特殊法人。1949年(昭和24年)に国民金融公庫に業務を引き継ぎ解
散した。"</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-10 15:45:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Thanks for the ref. しょみんきんこ according to it.
Why not obs? arch would be for archaic stuff</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8 +8 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;しょみんかねぐら&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;しょみんきんこ&lt;/reb&gt;
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;obs;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-10 16:56:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>use of the [obs] tag is confusing.  it has variously been applied to "words that are old but not old enough to be [arch]" and "words that have been completely supplanted by some other word" or "government agencies that no longer exist".  but i think we also decided it's not supposed to be applied to historical terminology

i looked at the list of stuff tagged as [obs] and it looks like a grab-bag.  this seems to qualify as much as a lot of the crap that is [obs]</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml