jmdict
1093320
Active
(id:
1981474)
<entry id="1981474" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1093320</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>ノーコメント</reb>
<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ノー・コメント</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>no comment</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-05-11 09:42:07" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノー・コメント</reb>
+</r_ele></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-09 00:35:07" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Better than [n], I think.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-09 03:17:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Isn't it worth keeping n though? n tells us
the correct application of の etc. is ”ノーコメ
ント_な_の?” while exp kind of leaves the user
(and machine learning software etc.) in the
dark.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-09 11:30:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>On second thought, [n] does make sense. Forgot about usage like ノーコメントを貫く, ノーコメントでいい, etc.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>