jmdict
1956810
Active
(id:
1979419)
<entry id="1979419" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1956810</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>如才</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>如在</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>じょさい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1762340">如才ない</xref>
<misc>&arch;</misc>
<gloss>sloppiness</gloss>
<gloss>carelessness</gloss>
<gloss>inattention</gloss>
<gloss>oversight</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-03-31 12:52:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The existing glosses were for 如才ない, which has the complete opposite meaning.
Appears to be [arch].</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij, koj</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>如在</keb>
@@ -12,11 +15,7 @@
-<gloss>affable</gloss>
-<gloss>slick</gloss>
-<gloss>smooth-tongued</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>smart</gloss>
-<gloss>sharp</gloss>
-<gloss>clever</gloss>
-<gloss>skillful</gloss>
-<gloss>adroit</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1762340">如才ない</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>sloppiness</gloss>
+<gloss>carelessness</gloss>
+<gloss>inattention</gloss>
+<gloss>oversight</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-05 04:56:12" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The two examples in daijr are from 1692 and 江戸後期, but
the first daijs example is from 1895 e.g. well into Meiji
(Meiji 28). 「お前に―は有るまいけれど」</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-05 12:11:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We have a lot of other entries tagged [arch] that have examples from the Meiji era.
I don't think this word is ever used nowadays except in the form 如才ない. I'd argue that makes it [arch].</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-06 00:26:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's not mentioned in the policy document, but when we
discussed this on the mailing list in 2012, Jim
suggested that:
"if the term was really only used in the Edo period or
earlier,
it should be marked "arch".
- if the term was used up to, say. early Showa, but is
no longer
current, it should be marked "obs". (ウンシャン from
"unschön"
is an example - it was a Meiji-to-early-Showa term)"
Maybe this should be discussed again on the mailing
list.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-05-20 09:07:33" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Let's close this with an arch for now. I tried raising the issue on the mailing list on April 6 but there wasn't much response.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>