<entry id="1978755" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1179600</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>奥付</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>奥附</keb>
<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>奥付け</keb>
<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>おくづけ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>colophon (at the end of a book)</gloss>
<gloss>imprint</gloss>
<gloss>publication information</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-07-12 06:37:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Paul Upchurch</upd_name>
<upd_refs>http://dic.search.yahoo.co.jp/search?ei=UTF-8&amp;p=%E5%A5%A5%E4%BB%98&amp;fr=dic&amp;stype=prefix
http://eow.alc.co.jp/%E5%A5%A5%E4%BB%98/UTF-8/?ref=sa</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +6,6 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;奥付&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;奥附&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -13,0 +19,4 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;publication data&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;production notes&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;printer's mark&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;publisher's emblem&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-07-12 06:47:06" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>original version is io</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;奥付け&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -12,0 +9,4 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;奥付け&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;io;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-09-24 05:35:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>奥付け is the only surface form listed in prog - is it 
necessarily io?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-09-24 18:45:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i'd tend to say yes.  not in a single other ref (inc. gg5, which prog is kind of drawn from), not in my IME, etc.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-05-13 14:31:05" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>奥附 isn't used any more. Not in the refs either.
I really don't think we need all these glosses.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, daij
jwiki: "「奥付」は「奥附」とも書くが[4]、「附」の字が1954年の当用漢字補正案で「削る字」とされたため現在でも多くのマスコミが使用を避けている"</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;oK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -19,5 +20,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;colophon&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;publication data&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;production notes&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;printer's mark&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;publisher's emblem&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;colophon (at the end of a book)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;imprint&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;publication information&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-05-14 06:33:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>