<entry id="1976788" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1270660</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>ご迷惑</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>御迷惑</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ごめいわく</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1532800">迷惑・1</xref>
<gloss>trouble</gloss>
<gloss>bother</gloss>
<gloss>annoyance</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-03-10 15:47:40" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>ご+[noun]. Same meaning as 迷惑. Not in the refs.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-11 01:23:45" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-27 09:03:45" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>There are 14 Tanaka sentences tagged ご迷惑
Resurrect or retag?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>G n-grams ご迷惑	2777437</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-28 05:01:49" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I retagged them to point to just 迷惑.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-28 07:54:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it's common enough to include (looking at the 
ngrams).</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-28 08:26:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree with Marcus that
ご～, お～, ～的, ～中, ～性 etc. compounds
that are obvious and not in the refs
should still be included if they are very common.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-28 10:41:12" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. I'll retag them.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-28 11:13:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>For 〜的 and ～性 compounds, I agree but the unwritten policy on ご〜/お〜 entries that we've been following up till now seems to work quite well.

Typically, we don't accept ご〜/お〜 entries (that aren't listed in dictionaries) unless they satisfy at least one of the following two conditions.

1. The word is more commonly used with ご/お than without (e.g. お湯).
2. The ご/お version has a different or more restricted meaning (e.g. お会計).

If a ご/お compound merely has to be common to warrant inclusion then there are probably dozens of words we could add.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-29 02:02:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I misunderstood Johan's number to come from the 
Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus, so I assumed this form 
was more common than it actually is. Still, 59k in the 
k/m ngrams is nothing to scoff at.
I don't really think there's an issue with including ご/
お compounds merely based on them being very common? 
"... then there are probably dozens of words we could 
add." 
Let's add them, then.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Kyoto/Melbourne ngrams
迷惑	281001
ご迷惑	58981</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-15 19:36:33" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree with Marcus</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>