jmdict
1509490
Rejected
(id:
1976454)
<entry id="1976454" stat="R" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1509490</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>別れ</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf08</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>分かれ</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>分れ</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>わかれ</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf08</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<stagk>別れ</stagk>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>parting</gloss>
<gloss>separation</gloss>
<gloss>farewell</gloss>
<gloss>(saying) goodbye</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<stagk>別れ</stagk>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>parting (through death)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>(lateral) branch</gloss>
<gloss>fork</gloss>
<gloss>offshoot</gloss>
<gloss>division</gloss>
<gloss>section</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-04-05 11:02:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Suggesting a merge with 分かれ based on daijr</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,0 +10,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>分かれ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>分れ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +23 @@
+<stagk>別れ</stagk>
@@ -20,0 +28,9 @@
+<gloss>(saying) goodbye</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>別れ</stagk>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>parting (through death)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-08 06:37:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not sure I agree with the merge. The JEs keep them well
apart.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-04-08 23:27:22" stat="R">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>we keep our verbs apart. so to me, it makes sense to keep the nouns apart as well</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>