<entry id="1973662" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2834510</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>いやん</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>イヤン</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>いやーん</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>イヤーン</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&int;</pos>
<misc>&fem;</misc>
<gloss>oh</gloss>
<gloss>no</gloss>
<gloss>don't</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-01-31 23:30:59" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>jitsuyo
wiktionary
ngrams

いやん	4845
イヤン	1963
いやーん	1338
いやあん	67
イヤーン	621
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail
/q11115147721
"若い女性が口語で使う「いや～ん」の語源を教えてください。"
"語源というか、そのまま『嫌』が元です。

『そんなことしちゃ嫌～(いや～)』『触っちゃいや～ん』

本気で嫌がっている時には使われず、軽く嫌がっている時やむしろそ
れを望んでいる時に使われています。"</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-01 10:39:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-01 13:20:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Kevin Johnson</upd_name>
<upd_detl>The reference provided (and my own experience) suggest that 
this definition is pretty lacking as-is. いや～ん is often 
flirtatious and never a serious denial.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +21 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;don't&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;don't (very lighthearted nuance)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-02 06:42:08" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +21 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;don't (very lighthearted nuance)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;don't (very light-hearted)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-02 22:45:55" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think that should probably be a usage note. I don't want 
to base it on something that's not in any of the sources so 
I don't know if "oft. used flirtatiously" would be quite 
right. Jitsuyo says "大体において愛嬌を醸す表現。" ... "oft. 
used winsomely"?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-02 23:36:41" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Maybe this?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+&lt;s_inf&gt;light-heartedly, flirtatiously&lt;/s_inf&gt;
@@ -21 +22 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;don't (very light-hearted)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;don't&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-06 00:18:56" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-06 01:34:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i ran this past a friend who is half-japanese and was raised bilingual and i asked him that if a woman said いやあん in a sexual context would it be considered "light-hearted/flirtatious", and after a bit of back and forth, his final comment was "i'm not kidding, there is a rape element to iyan."  he's not the type to throw that around lightly

so perhaps the current note is not adequate</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-06 04:50:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It might be safest to just remove it. That, or basing the 
note more closely on the jitsuyo definition and make it a 
"sometimes" to cover our bases. 
"sometimes used playfully"?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-28 02:07:26" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it's better to play safe and not attempt to qualify it.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;light-heartedly, flirtatiously&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>