<entry id="1970404" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1225070</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>戯評</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ぎひょう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>humorous comments</gloss>
<gloss>sarcastic remarks</gloss>
<gloss>cartoon</gloss>
<gloss>caricature</gloss>
<gloss>satire</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-08-02 13:24:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>This is the last one I am going to submit; someone should kill 
all these "humourouses" with a grep or something.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;humorous (sarcastic) comments (humourous)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;humorous (sarcastic) comments&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-02 14:31:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>paul</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Paul Blay</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It might not look nice, but it can be found in dictionaries (well, at least in Wordnet 3.0)
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/humourous (wordnet3.0)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-02 23:36:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>rather than grepping for all of them, it may just be easier for you to familiarize yourself with other spellings.  and yes, as Paul says, it's in dictionaries, e.g. as a spelling in the OED</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;humorous (sarcastic) comments&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;humorous comments&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;humourous comments&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;sarcastic remarks&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-03 06:30:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-06 00:41:12" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>my own error and i am now following up on this submitter's suggestion to eliminate the "humourous" forms.  it is in fact in the OED but listed last as 16th-18th century form</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;humourous comments&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>