<entry id="1969394" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2809750</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>取っ</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>突</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>とっ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&pref;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2451270">取り・とり・4</xref>
<s_inf>emphatic verb prefix</s_inf>
<gloss>very</gloss>
<gloss>much</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2014-02-24 08:10:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>daijs, meikyo</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-02-24 09:08:31" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Daijr, GG5 (has 突外れ), Koj (has 突外れ)</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;突&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-01-23 08:58:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Does this look better? Personally I really don't like it 
when we have explanations not tagged as such/usage notes as 
glosses. "取っ" does not mean "an emphatic prefix", so it 
can easily be misconstrued.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;before a verb&lt;/s_inf&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;emphatic prefix&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;emphatic verb prefix&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;very&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;much&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-01-27 02:39:19" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Looks OK.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>