<entry id="1968248" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1596370</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>相互</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf02</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>そうご</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf02</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
<gloss>mutual</gloss>
<gloss>reciprocal</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-01-14 12:39:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>双互 isn't in my refs and it's really uncommon. Most Google hits are Chinese. I propose we drop it.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>G n-grams:
双互	85</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-01-14 22:09:39" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Looks like a 変換ミス. Tempted to make it "iK", but probably best dropped.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;双互&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>