<entry id="1125111" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2096550</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>正義の剣</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>せいぎのけん</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss g_type="lit">sword of justice</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2006-08-08 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-06-26 13:10:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_detl>this seems a bit dubious, lots of hits (3m) but few (none) of 
the hits on the first page deal with light sabres, nor does 
the first page of google image hits. if it's to be kept, maybe 
it should instead be just "sword of justice"?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;light sabre (saber) (from the Star Wars films) (lit: sword of justice)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;light sabre (saber) (from the Star Wars films)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="lit"&gt;sword of justice)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-07-01 05:04:19" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Wonder about that "lit".</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;light sabre (saber) (from the Star Wars films)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;light sabre (from the Star Wars films) (saber)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-07-01 06:59:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="lit"&gt;sword of justice)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="lit"&gt;sword of justice&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-02-23 03:53:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>The Japanese Wikipedia page on ライトセーバー does not mention 正義
の剣 anywhere and there are a minimum of legitimate web search 
results using 正義の剣 in the context of Star Wars. The 
exception is the Japanese publisher's summary of the Revenge 
of the Sith novelization, but in my opinion this is inadequate 
proof the term is in common use.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;light sabre (from the Star Wars films) (saber)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-02-23 05:15:10" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>seems mostly like a random and kind of pointless construct. 
only 8k (b).</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-02-23 09:04:07" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Came from a usually reliable contributor, but in 2007 someone else recommended removal. Only 494 Google hits. Pretty obvious.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>