<entry id="1076286" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2114750</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>素股</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>すまた</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>bare thighs</gloss>
<gloss>inner thigh</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>intercrural sex</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2006-12-04 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-09-08 23:53:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_refs>Daijisen
Daijirin</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +12,5 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;bare thighs&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;inner thigh&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-09-09 03:58:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think the 内もも in sense 2 of both those refs is being used as a metaphor for the sexual activity, and shouldn't be the basis of a translation.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,1 +16,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;inner thigh&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-09-11 03:01:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i'm not sure about that.  koj puts the 内もも in sense 1, which makes more sense to me</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-09-12 01:47:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>So move that to sense 1?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;inner thigh&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-09-12 02:42:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i think this works.  afaict, "inner thigh" should be accounted for somewhere</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>