<entry id="1039584" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2102350</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>うれしい悲鳴をあげる</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>うれしいひめいをあげる</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<pos>&v1;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2572880">うれしい悲鳴</xref>
<gloss>to give a cry of delight</gloss>
<gloss>to be overwhelmed and delighted</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2006-10-03 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-20 16:50:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;v1;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-20 19:44:38" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-24 14:53:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>paul</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Paul Blay</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I presume the literal meaning still (only?) applies.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to give a cry of delight&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-24 17:14:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>probably a safe bet.

okay, so kojien has 嬉しい悲鳴 (with 嬉しい悲鳴をあげる as an example 
sentence), and 嬉しい悲鳴/うれしい悲鳴 gets plenty of hits without the あげる.  
the base form is also the only form that eijiro has.  so i'm going to add うれし
い悲鳴.  should we have both, or should this be deleted?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2572880"&gt;うれしい悲鳴&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-24 17:42:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>paul</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Paul Blay</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm easy on the 'both or delete' question.  It's probably worth adding 悲鳴をあげる though.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-24 19:03:35" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>agree.  well, with both of the base forms in there, i'm not sure we really "need" a 
third.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-24 22:08:46" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>