| From: Jim Breen jimbreen@********* [edict-jmdict] [edict-jmdict@***************] Sent: 15/9/2019 2:13:52 AM To: edict-jmdict@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Reference Dictionaries (Was: [edict-jmdict] About entries containing "with negative") ? On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 22:56, 'Zarlan .' zarlan@******** [edict-jmdict] <edict-jmdict@***************> wrote: > The ???????5? is the 5?, the fifth edition, of the dictionary. > The updates you speak of, are to the online version. Not the fifth edition. (and > not, in fact, from what I can tell, just the ??????, but also the E-J version ...and then some) Well, the Kenkyusha site labels it as "???????5?". > The fifth edition (GG5) _is_ perfectly static. As I mentioned earlier, there are corrections made to the "?5?" in the online version. For example they corrected a typo last year, after I pointed out that in the ??/?? entry they had ??? in sense 2 instead of the correct ???. > As it is a separate entity, if you cite from the website version you should not refer to it as GG5 or ???????5?, but as KOD or Kenkyusha Online Dictionary ...or ????????�????????. I quite disagree, Kenkyusha cites ???????5? and KOD???? as distinct sources. So should we. Jim
-- Jim Breen Adjunct Snr Research Fellow, Japanese Studies Centre, Monash University http://www.jimbreen.org/� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �http://nihongo.monash.edu/ |