Re: Inclusion of gikun readings in JMdict/Edict

[matt_bloedel@*********]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this Jim. If people are reading this Bible they will run across the gikun in practically every verse. English speaking readers will easily be able to know the translation of the word when they look at the verse in their English Bible, since the verse number is the same as that in the King James Version and most other versions of the Bible, so I was thinking of it not so much as a dictionary reference but rather simply as a logical way of arranging the gikun used in this translation so that they can be recorded somewhere, since it doesn't sound like people are interested in having these included in JMdict.