[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [edict-jmdict] Extra fields



On 11/04/2012 13:47, René Malenfant wrote:
On 2012-04-10, at 10:33 PM, Brandon Kentel wrote:

Re: 得

Where do you find reference to it using ワ行 sounds? Looking through any
text that uses 歴史仮名遣い, it's clearly used as:

得(う) (ア行下二段)

未 え
用 え
終 う
体 うる
已 うれ
命 えよ

There is nothing special about it per se other than it being one mora
long (see: 寝(ぬ) and 経(ふ))
I didn't say that 得 uses ワ行.  Please check that email again.
Indeed. My mistake.

Re: かり

Again, it's not really a special conjugation form but derives (as many
things do in old Japanese) from あり; in this case a contraction of ~
く+あり:

良し → 良く あり → 良かり = ラ変

Does it really need its own special form?
I have no idea.  But it goes without saying that あり is a verb, whereas 多かり is called an adjective by Japanese dictionaries.  Since it would therefore be "wrong" to call 多かり a verb, I can't see a reason not to have a PoS for adj-kari.


My point is that 多かり isn't a free standing word but just an unremarkable conjugation of 多し; should 若かり and every other possibility also all get adj-kari entries? All ~く ~しく adjectives are possible candidates in that case -- what makes one word a candidate and not others?

Brandon