Re: Extra fields

[Jim Breen <jimbreen@*********>]

On 9 April 2012 11:24, Jim Breen <jimbreen@gmail.com> wrote:
> ....I want to run them past now in case any more can be flushed out.

Summarizing so far:

> "joc" for jocular/humorous words/expressions  ("hum" is taken.)
- no objections

> "biol" and/or "taxon".  I'm not really sure about the usefulness of these,
> but it won't do any harm enabling them.

JL rightly points out they are not fields, and suggests things like
"zool" and "bot", which are fine with me.
Nils has made a number of good suggestions: "law", "med" (which I'd
interpret broadly to include anatomy, etc.), "fin", "eng", "Shinto". I'd
add "geol", "astron", "music", all of which have a lot of in-line annotations
at present.

> <POS>

Rene's list looks good.

Maybe that's enough for now.

Jim

-- 
Jim Breen
Adjunct Snr Research Fellow, Clayton School of IT, Monash University
Webmaster: Hawthorn Rowing Club, Treasurer: Japanese Studies Centre
Graduate student: Language Technology Group, University of Melbourne