Re: [edict-jmdict] Vocabulary Relationships and Important Links

["Paul Blay" <blay.paul@**************>]

> I copy the suggestion for antonyms. Lately I find me more often in
> situations where I hoped there was an easy way to look up antonyms for
> words.

There is an (ant: ) link standard.  However the (ant: ) links (unlike
the (See ) links) are not 'live'.  e.g. you can't click on them to go
to the entry in question.

x-refs, pos and such like information is not searchable on in WWWJDIC.
(There may well be other online dictionaries that use the Edict / JMDict
data where they can be used).