Re: [edict-jmdict] minor kanjidic error?

[Brandon Kentel <bkentel@************>]

??(U+5DE2) is a member of JIS X 213: 1,84,08
Or, is JIS X 213 excluded from kanjidic2 (I forget...).

Regardless, the dictionary I have in front of me ???h?呛??? lists ?z as
木+?? and lists ??, its orthodox form, as ??+??. That said, Unihan does
list ?z under ??, however I believe that's only because it's considered
a variant (Z) form of the original character.

Jim Breen wrote:
>
> 2008/6/15 Stuart McGraw <smcg4191@frii.com>:
> > In kanjidic2, character ?z (u+5DE3) is listed as having
> > radical #47. Shouldn't it be 42?
>
> No, it's really #47 (I just checked 3 ?h?痛堑?). The reason
> is that it's a simplification of ??, which is not in any
> Japanese standards, and hence not in Kanjidic. (By inserting
> that, er, hanzi in this email, I have forced Google to send it
> in either UTF8 or GB2312.)
>
> Cheers
>
> Jim
>
> --
> Jim Breen
> Honorary Senior Research Fellow
> Clayton School of Information Technology,
> Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
> http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/
>