Re: [edict-jmdict] minor kanjidic error?

["Jim Breen" <jimbreen@*********>]

2008/6/15 Stuart McGraw <smcg4191@frii.com>:
> In kanjidic2, character ? (u+5DE3) is listed as having
> radical #47. Shouldn't it be 42?

No, it's really #47 (I just checked 3 ?和辞典). The reason
is that it's a simplification of 巢, which is not in any
Japanese standards, and hence not in Kanjidic. (By inserting
that, er, hanzi in this email, I have forced Google to send it
in either UTF8 or GB2312.)

Cheers

Jim

-- 
Jim Breen
Honorary Senior Research Fellow
Clayton School of Information Technology,
Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/