[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [edict-jmdict] Re: ENAMDICT



On 19/09/06, Jim Breen <Jim.Breen@infotech.monash.edu.au> wrote:

Once it's in a database form, different subsets can be generated, e.g.
a pure name+reading, a full-blown all-details, etc.
The Japanese Wikipedia has a heap of city entries. I can't see it going
that far.

In a database it would make a lot more sense to have one table
consisting of postcodes and place names and then just look up the
postcodes by a search on the place names. Why you'd want to provide
that service I'm not sure, but it's unrelated to enamdict as such. The
data should be stored in a completely different file structured around
the addresses. Adding postcode data in the form of multiple postcodes
for each place name to the enamdict file would make for a very poor
structure.