[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [edict-jmdict] P Markers

To: edict-jmdict@***************
Subject: Re: [edict-jmdict] P Markers
From: Jim Rose <jim@*************>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:10:45 -0400

Ah yes, but that would require the putative distributed Google Harvester to work with JMDICT instead of EDICT.

On Aug 18, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Paul Blay wrote:

> Since EDICT expands daily, might be a great time for
> implementation of a unique ID number for each entry

It's got one. Unique per JMDICT entry, which may include
multiple headwords and readings.

References:
- Re: [edict-jmdict] P Markers
  - From: Jim Breen <Jim.Breen@**********************>
- Re: [edict-jmdict] P Markers
  - From: Jim Rose <jim@*************>
- Re: [edict-jmdict] P Markers
  - From: "Paul Blay" <blay.paul@**************>

Prev by Date: Re: Sensitive words
Next by Date: Re: [edict-jmdict] P Markers
Previous by thread: Re: [edict-jmdict] P Markers
Next by thread: Re: [edict-jmdict] P Markers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread