https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topspin
https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=topspin

https://kotobank.jp/word/とつぷすぴん-3215005#w-584107

トップ・スピン	372	1.4%
トップスピン	25591	98.6%

This is usually written as one word in English (but some hits for トップ・スピン so keeping it)

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>top spin</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>topspin</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トップ・スピン</reb>

Yes, we wouldn't include it as a search form here.

All hits are for 異体字 wenn looking 異字体 up.
I don't see this in any references

Agree, remove due to 2/3 rule. No reference was submitted to substantiate that 異字体 is used as an [iK] or the likes.
Would really need to be its own entry

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>異字体</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think 異字体 is read いじたい.

異体字	40293	94.2%
異字体	2478	5.8%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>異字体</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Not for an example.

wasn't i.e. correct?

Meikyo, sankoku

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

https://senseis.xmp.net/?Miai

English go players just say miai, the sentence long definition should be an explanation instead.

@@ -36 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>two different options such that if one player takes one, the other player can take the other</gloss>
+<gloss>miai</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">two different options such that if one player takes one, the other player can take the other</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Added sense.

@@ -22,2 +22,10 @@
-<gloss>formal marriage interview</gloss>
-<gloss>marriage meeting</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>(formal) meeting with a view to marriage</gloss>
+<gloss>interview with a prospective spouse</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>correspondence</gloss>
+<gloss>balance</gloss>
@@ -28 +36 @@
-<gloss>two different options such that, if one player takes one, the other player can take the other</gloss>
+<gloss>two different options such that if one player takes one, the other player can take the other</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

黒曜岩	478
黒曜石	59522

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1288210">黒曜石</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1288210">黒曜石</xref>
+<field>&min;</field>

https://www.godictionary.net/term/shikatsu.html
https://senseis.xmp.net/?LifeAndDeath

life and death in go refers to if a group can stay without getting captured unconditionally (life) or will be captured unconditionally (death) and talking about this is called life and death or 死活 in Japanese, so in a sense it's the same as its original meaning but in go it specificaly refers to group of stones

@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&go;</field>
+<gloss>life and death (of a group of stones)</gloss>
+</sense>

i don't see a need to specify.  not vs

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -18 +17 @@
-<gloss>life and death (e.g. in Go)</gloss>
+<gloss>life and death</gloss>

wiki

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>life and-or death</gloss>
+<gloss>life and death (e.g. in Go)</gloss>
+<gloss>life or death</gloss>

Two senses.

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<gloss>gardener</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>gardener</gloss>

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; ハイブリッド新辞林; 三省堂国語辞典　第七版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>garden centre</gloss>

Wrong apostrophe

@@ -51 +51 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">connection underneath the opponent’s stones at or near the edge of the board</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">connection underneath the opponent's stones at or near the edge of the board</gloss>

Use in English:
https://senseis.xmp.net/?Watari

Japanese def:

大辞林 第三版
 わたり【渡り】
■一■ [0]（名）
〔動詞「渡る」の連用形から〕
⑩囲碁で，二群の石が盤側（多くは第一線または第二線）で連絡しあうこと。

the prior definition is inaccurate and confusing. Yes a watari is a connection but a special kind of connection, not any random connection on the board qualifies as such.

@@ -50 +50,2 @@
-<gloss>connection</gloss>
+<gloss>watari</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">connection underneath the opponent’s stones at or near the edge of the board</gloss>

@@ -47,0 +48 @@
+<field>&go;</field>
@@ -49 +50 @@
-<gloss>connection (in the game of go)</gloss>
+<gloss>connection</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/薄弱-600227#w-600227

薄弱	98866	87.8%
薄弱な	13729	12.2%

Multiple parts of speech, putting n first and removing "weak"

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>weak</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&math;</field>

本降り	86525	99.4%
本ぶり	498	0.6%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>本ぶり</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijs, koj

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>proper rainfall</gloss>
+<gloss>heavy rainfall</gloss>
+<gloss>heavy snowfall</gloss>
+<gloss>steady rainfall</gloss>

Also snow.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>regular rainfall</gloss>
+<gloss>proper rainfall</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>downpour</gloss>

幼なじみ	443587	48.9%
幼馴染み	98724	10.9%
幼馴染	360998	39.8%
幼ななじみ	3282	0.4%
幼な馴染み	1019	0.1%
幼馴じみ	414	0.0%

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>幼馴染</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14 +17,2 @@
-<keb>幼馴染</keb>
+<keb>幼ななじみ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +21 @@
-<keb>幼ななじみ</keb>
+<keb>幼な馴染み</keb>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I came across this rarer form in Norwegian Wood: "多くの幼ななじみのカップルがそうであるように、彼らの閥係は非常にオーブンだったし、二人きりでいたいというような願望はそれほどは強くはないようだった。"

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>幼ななじみ</keb>

Quiet

I'd drop it. I'll approve and reopen for a bit.

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<s_inf>after the -te form of an atelic verb; indicates continuing action</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the -te form of a verb; indicates continuing action</s_inf>
@@ -37 +37 @@
-<s_inf>after the -te form of a telic verb; indicates continuing state</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the -te form of a verb; indicates continuing state</s_inf>

I think an examples helps, yes. The usefulness of simply mentioning "telicity" is doubtful.
I could go either way here, i.e. no mention of telicity or mention it with an example.

Well, it is potentially useful - but only if a given reader goes on to do some research on the terminology.
If we want to make it immediately useful, giving an example of each could help give a hint.
Here is a suggestion:
[3][aux-v,v1][uk]
  [note="after the -te form of an atelic verb, e.g. 走って～いる; indicates continuing action"]
  to be ...-ing
[4][aux-v,v1][uk]
  [note="after the -te form of a telic verb, e.g. 死んで～いる; indicates continuing state"]
  to have ...-ed; to be ...-ed

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; 研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; NEW斎藤和英大辞典

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>simple meal</gloss>

新和英中辞典: 茶漬け cooked rice with tea (poured on it); tea on rice

"submerged in" gives a wrong impression, I think.

@@ -24,1 +24,1 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">cooked rice submerged in green tea</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">cooked rice with green tea poured on it</gloss>

@@ -22,1 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>rice with tea poured on it (Japanese dish)</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>chazuke</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">cooked rice submerged in green tea</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Usually glossed as a noun.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,3 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>commonplace</gloss>
-<gloss>vapid</gloss>
-<gloss>insipid</gloss>
+<gloss>tastelessness</gloss>
+<gloss>lack of taste</gloss>
+<gloss>vulgarity</gloss>

sankoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 没趣味　 │ 195 │ 76.2% │
│ 没趣味な │  61 │ 23.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

Second reading also in GendaiRK
.

Not very common

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; 研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; NEW斎藤和英大辞典

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぼっしゅみ</reb>

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">a cycle that can be repeated indefinitely and neither group dies</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">cycle that can be repeated indefinitely and neither group dies</gloss>

https://senseis.xmp.net/?EternalLife
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/長生

@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&go;</field>
+<gloss>eternal life</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">a cycle that can be repeated indefinitely and neither group dies</gloss>
+</sense>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

クラシック音楽	998923	97.5%
クラッシック音楽	21658	2.1%
クラッシク音楽	3722	0.4%

@@ -9,0 +10,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クラッシク音楽</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +17,0 @@
-<re_restr>クラシック音楽</re_restr>
@@ -15,4 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>クラッシックおんがく</reb>
-<re_restr>クラッシック音楽</re_restr>

Yes, not geology.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<stagr>セラック</stagr>
@@ -21,2 +22,2 @@
-<field>&geol;</field>
-<gloss>(セラック only) serac</gloss>
+<gloss>serac</gloss>
+<gloss>block or column of glacial ice</gloss>

Encountered the expression セラック while watching an NHK program related to mountain climbing - web sources:
http://www.hokkaido-haa.net/manaslu/mame/yougo/yougo.html
https://www.yamareco.com/modules/yamainfo/word.php?wid=1194
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アイスフォール
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serac

Domain or Field Codes: "geology" can't be right, but we seem to have no code for mountaineering or glacieology
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaciology)

@@ -16,0 +17,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2819450">氷塔</xref>
+<field>&geol;</field>
+<gloss>(セラック only) serac</gloss>

シェラック	8502	55.9%
セラック	6660	43.8%
シケラック	35	0.2% saw in 1965 book

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シケラック</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Entry created

Thanks,  Georgi, for pointing this out. I see the English-Japanese dictionaries equate Bulgar and Bulgarian, but they probably shouldn't.
There are a few WWW hits for ブルガール語, but it is probably not worth an entry.

Japanese Wikipedia (ブルガール語 entry)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ブルガール語
Quote: 「現存する「ブルガリア語」とは異なります。」

Bulgarian Wikipedia (Прабългарски език)
https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/Прабългарски_език

Cambridge Dictionary (Bulgarian)
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bulgarian?q=Bulgarian

Oxford English Dictionary – Bulgar
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/bulgar_n
Note: Defines Bulgar as a Turkic tribe, separate from the modern Bulgarian language.

Oxford English Dictionary – Bulgarian
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/bulgarian_n?tab=factsheet#12440237

Merriam-Webster – Bulgarian
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Bulgarian

Merriam-Webster – Bulgar
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bulgar

Encyclopaedia Britannica - Bulgarian (language)
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bulgarian-language

Encyclopaedia Britannica - Bulgar (people) - the "Also called: Bulgarian" refers strictly to the ethnic group, not the language.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bulgar

Hello, I'd like to clarify that ブルガリア語 specifically means the Bulgarian language, a modern Slavic language spoken in Bulgaria today. ブルガール語 refers to the now extinct Oghur Turkic language spoken by the medieval Bulgars (mid-7th century). In Bulgarian, this is called "Прабългарски език" (Proto-Bulgarian language). Bulgarian and Proto-Bulgarian ("Bulgar") are by no means interchangeable; while they share a distant linguistic connection, they belong to entirely different language families.

The term "Bulgar" refers strictly to the medieval Bulgar people, a Turkic tribe from the early Middle Ages—not the modern language. There is no such thing as a "Bulgar language" today.

If you accept "Bulgar" as meaning Bulgarian (language), by the same logic you would have to list “Frankish” under フランス語, which is clearly wrong.

Looking at reputable sources:

The Japanese Wikipedia page states explicitly: 「現存する「ブルガリア語」とは異なります。」

The Bulgarian Wikipedia calls the language "Прабългарски език" and clearly describes it as a dead language spoken by the Bulgars long ago.

Cambridge Dictionary never conflates "Bulgar" with the Bulgarian language.

Oxford English Dictionary separates "Bulgar" (the Turkic tribe) and "Bulgarian" (the modern language and people). Any connection is strictly ethnographic/historical.

Merriam-Webster also treats "Bulgar" and "Bulgarian" as separate entries with distinct meanings. Again, any connection is strictly ethnographic/historical.

As a native Bulgarian who speaks English fluently, this distinction is very important. The current listing is misleading, historically inaccurate, and frankly insulting. I urge for it to be corrected as soon as possible.

Thank you for your time.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>Bulgar</gloss>

I'm OK with leaving it like this. It's very marginal as an entry.

Yea, I guess we could technically use the [cop] tag .

Re: Wording
It wasn't really the use of "copula" for me, I just thought it sounded odd the way it was previously. But having the tag works too in my eyes

I was going to propose changing the xref on sense 1 to refer to 如く instead, but I remembered that it was a bit special for 如し.
Nikkoku confirms that 連体形、連用形 and 終止形 were all used as 連用修飾語

I don't think there's much more left to add, is there?

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence end; acts as copula by itself</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at sentence end</s_inf>

So, I changed the tag over [1] from [poet] to [arch] in the actual edit, but forgot to do so for the [1] in my suggestion under my comment.
I confess, your excellence; I copy and pasted the [1] in my suggestion from the pre-edit entry, take me away.

Incidentally, about [arch] over [poet]： since thanks to your references it seems clear beyond doubt that this was only used in ye olden times, it is probably best to leave it as [arch] since there is a group of archaic words that are still occasionally used in poetry - なり、ず、ざる、し、たり、etc. 
The wording on [2], I do not think matters much - if someone does not know what a copula is, it is moot either way; and I am not sure how likely it is that such a person will know and/or remember what exactly is a predicate, so that might not fare much better either.
Maybe just settle for the [cop] tag... and speaking of which, I have just added it since we are proceeding with aux-v.

(Regarding "corpi"; I said "ellision" instead of "ellipsis" even though I had correctly named it just two lines earlier)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&poet;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&cop;</pos>

Frellesvig, Bjarke, Stephen Wright Horn et al. (eds.) 2023. Oxford-NINJAL Corpus of Old Japanese. 
Available at: http://oncoj.ninjal.ac.jp/

In the ONCOJ, ごと is classified as follows:
"goto        (adjective; non-inflecting)        007004a (frequency 90)  be like"

These are all hits for this ごと the ONCOJ  (If you are required to enter a password, see this page: https://oncoj.ninjal.ac.jp/index.html)
https://oncoj.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/oncoj_tgrep2.sh?search=/007004a/

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
角川古語大辞典 tags 名詞, but that either does not account for sentence final usage, or supposes copula ellision. 
Note that none of their examples have ごと in sentence-final position.

旺文社古語辞典 第五版 performs the split you have proposed, but sadly does not give a PoS:
  １．（連用修飾語となって）．．．ように 
  ２．（述語となって）．．．ようだ

大修館 全訳古語辞典 gives 助動詞, and has only one sense:
  １．〔助動〕比況（たとえ）～のとうに。～のようだ。

Weblio古語辞典:
  １． …のように。…のよう。▽連用形「ごとく」と同じ用法。
  ２． …のようだ。▽終止形「ごとし」と同じ用法。

Nikkoku: 
（助動詞「ごとし」の語幹。本来、「同じ」の意を表わす「こと」の濁音化したもので、体言的性格をもつ）ごとく。ように。同じく。
Does not mention copular usage at all in the entry. But funnily enough they do in a note in the ごとし entry: (2)語幹「ごと」は連用修飾格や述語格などに用いられた。

As expected, the modern corpora I have access to return 0 results for this ごと.

＞ Anyway, if this is copula ellision then I am in full agreement with Sombrero and this thing is functionally a 形式名詞; but much like よう, it is not exclusively adverbial.
   Otherwise, if it never took なり then it is functionally a copular itself and the [aux-v] tag is arguably justified, or at least Daijirin and Wiktionary think so.
  ＞ From what I could gather, there existed (as a lexicalized form) only ごとくなり (cf. Haruo Shirane - Classical Japanese - A Grammar, p. 136), but not ごとなり. 
     Furthermore, not a single one of the examles in the ONCOJ show ごと being followed by なり, or any copular for that matter, so I believe it is rather unlikely to be copula ellision.
     Hence you are most likely right in your second argument, and I just went a full circle. 
     I fear Frellesvig's classification of "adjective" doesn't help us too much, since he rarely uses 国語 terminology and classification when it comes to grammar. 
     As that "kind" of adjective really has no corresponding PoS marker in 国語文法 or JMdict for that matter.

＞ Also retagging from [poet] to [arch] - while I myself have heard 如し and 如く in poetry several times, when it is ごと all I think is "maybe once or twice？" 
   but even then I might be thinking of some snippet from Old Japanese; 
   I tried looking for an example for a while but came up with nothing, feel free to change this back if you find or know of one.
   ＞ I assume some references tag [poet] because most usage examples (at least in Old Japanese) are from the 万葉集. 
      Though there are also examples from the heian and early kamakura period in references.
      Nevertheless, it is of course archaic as well, my non-古語 references are split between [poet] and [arch] (of those who give a tag).
      I do not know of any poems using ごと, as I have not really gotten to the point where I delve into such. Though I certainly wish to do so one day.


Interestingly it seems like 連用修飾語 usage was (somewhat/far) more common than 述語 usage, already in Old Japanese (only 7/90 usages in the ONCOJ are sentence final).
The majority of my (non-kogo) references describe and attest only the "のように" meaning.
Another notable, but not relevant bit of information is the fact that ごとし was far less common (according to ONCOJ) in Old Japanese, than ごと by itself (52 - 90).
And according to nikkoku, ごと was already present in the kojiki, while ごとし was not. I like to imagine that it went こと ＞ ごと ＞ ごとし, but that is just unfounded speculation on my part.


As for the note on sense 2, I find "forms copular sentence" to be a bit difficult to grasp. Perhaps what I proposed works better? Or maybe "forms predicate by itself"?
I applied a slightly modified version, with the changed PoS tags, of your proposed version. Please check whether it is fine this way.



(In writing this I noticed that I pluralized "corpus" wrong up until now...)

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13,7 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>
+<s_inf>all senses: after が, の, or the attributive form of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>like...</gloss>
+<gloss>similar to...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +21,3 @@
-<s_inf>after が, の, or the attributive form of a verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>like</gloss>
-<gloss>similar to</gloss>
+<s_inf>at sentence end; acts as copula by itself</s_inf>
+<gloss>is like...</gloss>
+<gloss>is similar to...</gloss>

The 助動詞 tag given by Daijirin is probably because of this: 「② …のようだ。「ごとし」の終止形にあたる。『逢 (あ) ふことは玉の緒ばかり名の立つは吉野の川のたぎつ瀬の―』〈古今・恋三〉」
Ironically, there is no such sense in Daijirin and I pulled this from Daijisen.
Meikyou: 「〚文語助動詞「ごとし」の語幹〛…のようだ、…のように、の意を表す。」
Weblio: 「②　のようだ。▽終止形「ごとし」と同じ用法。」.
Japanese Wiktionary has its entry for 如 as a 助動詞 with the paradigm of ○｜ごと｜ごと｜○｜○｜○ 
https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/ごと#助動詞

Well, the entry is missing the copulaless copular usage mentioned in some dictionaries.
That said, the dropping of the copula can happen with just about any nominal and was rather common in Old Japanese compared to modern day - you could go on for noticeably longer without seeing なり than you can without seeing だ.
Perhaps the dictionaries that say nothing of that usage did not consider it to be a property of 如 but rather just your average copula ellipsis (but do not take my word for it on this last statement, confirming or denying this would require scouring for instances of ごと followed by なり in Old Japanese - or lack thereof - which I have not done).

Anyway, if this is copula ellision then I am in full agreement with Sombrero and this thing is functionally a 形式名詞; but much like よう, it is not exclusively adverbial.
Otherwise, if it never took なり then it is functionally a copular itself and the [aux-v] tag is arguably justified, or at least Daijirin and Wiktionary think so.

I leave this rough suggestion below in case we decide to include the copular sense.
[1][n,n-suf][poet]
  [note="all senses: after が, の, or the attributive form of a verb"]
  like...; similar to...
  [see=1466930・如し[1]]
[2][n,n-suf][arch]
  [note="at sentence end; forms copular sentence"]
 is like...; is similar to...

Also retagging from [poet] to [arch] - while I myself have heard 如し and 如く in poetry several times, when it is ごと all I think is "maybe once or twice？" but even then I might be thinking of some snippet from Old Japanese; I tried looking for an example for a while but came up with nothing, feel free to change this back if you find or know of one.
Lastly, reminder to alter the part-of-speech tags accordingly, depending on whether we decide to go with it being a nominal or an auxiliary verb.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<misc>&poet;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

* chuujiten
* https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/calcined gypsum
  gypsum partially dehydrated by heat
    specifically : plaster of paris 

{焼,焼き,やき}{石,せっ,セッ}{膏,こう,コウ} 

焼石膏　　　　 833 56.8%
焼き石膏　　　 249 17.0%
焼石こう　　　 169 11.5%
焼せっこう　　  87  5.9%
焼きせっこう　  40  2.7% <- 建築学用語辞典
焼きセッコウ　  34  2.3%
焼セッコウ　　  31  2.1% <- heibonsha
焼き石こう　　  23  1.6%
...
しょうせっこう   0  0.0%
やきせっこう　   0  0.0%

@@ -6,0 +7,27 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼き石膏</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼石こう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼せっこう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼きせっこう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼きセッコウ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼セッコウ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼き石こう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +36,4 @@
+<re_restr>焼石膏</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>やきせっこう</reb>
@@ -12,0 +44 @@
+<gloss>plaster of Paris</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

britt; マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典

No n-gram hits for all permutations of 〈方／ほう／ホウ〉〈硼／ほう／ホウ〉〈石／せき／セキ〉

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>方ホウ石</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>方ほう石</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

* nipponica
* マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典
* 自然科学系和英大辞典

{束,たば,タバ,そく,ソク}{沸,ふっ,フッ}{石,せき,セキ}

束沸石　　　 491
...
そくふっせき   0
たばふっせき   0

スティルバイト 294

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そくふっせき</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>desmine</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; ＣＤ－科学技術４５万語対訳辞典 英和・和英;  研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

daijr/s; nipp; マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典

玉滴石　　　　 236
ぎょくてきせき   0

ハイアライト 58

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>water opal</gloss>
+<gloss>Müller's glass</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

nipp; britt

日長石　　　　 757 96.9%
にっちょうせき  24  3.1%

サンストーン 13,322

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2503900">サンストーン</xref>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 広辞苑 第六版

* マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典
* 自然科学系和英大辞典

灰硝石 0
硝酸カルシウム 1,415

While this is in a decent amount of references, it really only gets some Google hits in a few PDFs.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 日外３５万語科学技術用語大辞典; ＣＤ－科学技術４５万語対訳辞典 英和・和英

Daijirin, GG5, JA Wiki

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ケロイド │ 78,147 │ 99.9% │ - Xref
│ 蟹足腫　 │     74 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

sankoku; heibonsha; etc.

ゲンジボタル 48,743 76.4%
源氏蛍　　　  6,929 10.9%
源氏ボタル　  4,801  7.5%
ゲンジ蛍　　  1,422  2.2%
源氏ぼたる　  1,306  2.0%
げんじ蛍　　    203  0.3%
げんじぼたる    343  0.5%

@@ -5,0 +6,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>源氏ボタル</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ゲンジ蛍</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>源氏ぼたる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/源氏蛍-492148#w-492148
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ゲンジボタル

ゲンジボタル	48743	87.6%
源氏蛍	6929	12.4%

daijs, wiki

GG5 has the older Luciola lateralis.

ヘイケボタル	16559	84.9%
平家蛍	2952	15.1%

https://kotobank.jp/word/平家蛍-623940#w-1774308
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヘイケボタル

Couldn't really find an English common name for this one

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬───┬───────╮
│ 恐日病　　　　　 │ 0 │  NaN% │
│ きょうにちびょう │ 0 │  NaN% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴───┴───────╯
Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───┬───────╮
│ 恐日病 │ 0 │  NaN% │
╰─ーーー─┴───┴───────╯

same as the previous

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<field>&med;</field>
-<gloss>japanophobia</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>Japanophobia</gloss>

NEW斎藤和英大辞典

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>clearing hospital</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

Not part of a body.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>infected district</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

KOD

日本大百科全書; 英辞郎１０３

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>institute</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────┬───────╮
│ 渡渉場 │ 24 │100.0% │Nikkoku
│ 徒渉場 │  0 │  0.0% │Nikkoku
╰─ーーー─┴────┴───────╯
Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───┬───────╮
│ 渡渉場 │ 3 │ 75.0% │
│ 徒渉場 │ 1 │ 25.0% │
╰─ーーー─┴───┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>渡渉場</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

OK

@@ -42,0 +43 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2867012">ぶち壊し・1</xref>

〈打ち／打〉〈壊し／壊／毀し／毀／こわし〉
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 打ち壊し　 │ 12.949 │ 61.7% │
│ 打ちこわし │  6.273 │ 29.9% │
│ 打壊し　　 │    532 │  2.5% │Shinsen, Smk, Iwakoku; add; [sK]
│ 打毀し　　 │    527 │  2.5% │Iwakoku, Koj; add; [rK]
│ 打ち毀し　 │    287 │  1.4% │[rK] ⇒ [sK]
│ 打ち壊　　 │    123 │  0.6% │add; [sK]
│ 打壊　　　 │    122 │  0.6% │add; [sK]
│ 打こわし　 │     96 │  0.5% │add; [sK]
│ 打毀　　　 │     72 │  0.3% │add; [sK]
│ 打ち毀　　 │      0 │  0.0% │ / 
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Agree, GG5 also has another sense for ぶちこわし which is also in Luminous.

That comma in sense 2 obstructs reading in my eyes, I don't think it's needed.

@@ -10,0 +11,8 @@
+<keb>打毀し</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打壊し</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12 +20,13 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打ち壊</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打壊</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打こわし</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,3 +37,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ぶちこわし</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -28,0 +46 @@
+<gloss>tearing down</gloss>
@@ -31 +48,0 @@
-<stagr>うちこわし</stagr>
@@ -35 +52 @@
-<gloss>destructive urban riots, protesting the high price of rice</gloss>
+<gloss>destructive urban riots protesting the high price of rice</gloss>

I dont think ぶちこわし and うちこわし should be together, 打ち壊す and ぶち壊す were spkit for instance.

ぶち壊し	118264

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

actually should be "low leg cut", low cut is something different I think

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>low cut (leotard, swimsuit)</gloss>
+<gloss>low leg cut (leotard, swimsuit)</gloss>

ローレグ	1904	94.4%
ローレッグ	113	5.6%


https://kotobank.jp/word/ろーれぐ-663201#w-663201

daijs

basically aligning with the ハイレグ entry

https://kotobank.jp/word/月状骨-1310107#w-1824990
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/月状骨

daijs, wiki

月状骨	1118

https://kotobank.jp/word/球春-476956#w-476956

daijs

球春	18611

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>hooked bone</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/有鉤骨-1826233#w-1826233
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/有鈎骨

daijs, wiki

有鈎骨	616

https://kotobank.jp/word/三角骨-1825153#w-1825153
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/三角骨

daijs, wiki

三角骨	678

https://kotobank.jp/word/豆状骨-1825699#w-1825699
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/豆状骨

daijs, wiki

豆状骨	470

岩波 生物学辞典 第4版, 日外35万語科学技術用語大辞典: pearl organ

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuptial_tubercles

＞ Could maybe leave out the longer explanation
   ＞ Agree, I think it's better this way, replaced with the gloss from the iwanami dictionary.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&zool;</field>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>pearl organs</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>white bumps that appear on a fish during mating season</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/追星
https://kotobank.jp/word/追星-38483#w-448580

daijs, wiki

追星	3755	68.9%
追い星	1697	31.1%

Could maybe leave out the longer explanation

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 箒目　　 │ 632 │ 82.6% │
│ ほうき目 │ 133 │ 17.4% │shinsen; add
╰─ーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほうき目</keb>

ルミナス
箒目	632

Odd

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>broom marks</gloss>
+<gloss>broom marks (on swept ground)</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>strike</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; ビジネス技術実用英語大辞典; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>industrial laws</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>retrospective law</gloss>

学研 パーソナル和英辞典; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; デジタル大辞泉; 広辞苑 第六版; 研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>ravenous eater</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; NEW斎藤和英大辞典; 英辞郎１０３

英辞郎１０３; ＣＤ－科学技術４５万語対訳辞典 英和・和英; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>someone who has died without having made a will</gloss>

Or "an intestate".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>intestate</gloss>
+<gloss>intestate person</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

Reverso

https://kotobank.jp/word/帰陣-473848#w-473848

daijs

帰陣	3904

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

ベビーギャング	1517

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ベビー・ギャング</reb>

大辞林　第四版; ハイブリッド新辞林: いたずらっ子。

学研国語大辞典: 大人が驚くほどのいたずらっ子.

GG5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>art show</gloss>

用例ファイル; 日本大百科全書; 英辞郎１０３

貿易省	3605
Eijiro

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>department of trade</gloss>
-<gloss>ministry of trade</gloss>
+<gloss>Department of trade</gloss>
+<gloss>Ministry of trade</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/貿易省

https://thelawdictionary.org/key-telephone-system-kts/

forgot second gloss

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>KTS</gloss>

https://www.dialogic.com/glossary/key-telephone-system-kts

＊ マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典-第3版-: key telephone system; [通信] いくつかの電鍵をもつ電話器，接続ケーブル，交換装置からなり，交換のための専用の扱者を置かないで，使用者が回線を選択して呼びを保留することができる電話方式．

＊ 日外35万語科学技術用語大辞典: key telephone system

＊ 科学技術45万語対訳辞典 英和和英: key telephone system

.

The products listed in the submitted reference are more specific than "button telephone"

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>button telephone</gloss>
+<field>&telec;</field>
+<gloss>key telephone system</gloss>

https://www.daiko-tsusan.co.jp/ja/product/product_05.html

＊ 25万語医学用語大辞典 英和/和英: autophobia; eremophobia
＊ 日外35万語科学技術用語大辞典: autophobia; eremophobia; monophobia
＊〔理・工・農・医・社会〕自然科学系英和大辞典Version3: autophobia

According to wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autophobia#Diagnosis) autophobia is slightly different.
マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典-第3版- agrees:  独居恐怖症 eremophobia; ［心］一人でいることを異常に恐怖する状態．
                                            自己恐怖症 autophobia; ［心］自分自身や一人でいることを異常に恐怖する状態．

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<field>&psy;</field>
+<gloss>eremophobia</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

Not sure they do it any more.

Shinsen, Sankoku, Oukoku

Shinsen a.o. : ❶軍隊が陣地で冬をすごすこと。また、その陣地。

.

Is this really [hist]? I don't see any indication for said tag.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -13 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>going into winter quarters</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +20,3 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mil;</field>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>winter encampment (of a military)</gloss>
+<gloss>winter encampment</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/冬営
https://kotobank.jp/word/冬営-579574#w-579574

daijs (2 senses), wiki

冬営	1291

裾空き: https://www.godictionary.net/term/susoaki.html

Yes, the -空き form looks to be the canonical one. Almost no go-related results for 「裾開き」. Keeping 「裾空き」 visible since it has the kanji.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">opening on one or both sides of edge territory, allowing opponent to jump in</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">opening on one or both sides of edge territory, allowing the opponent to jump in</gloss>

裾開き	519	60.5% - mostly false positives, WWW images are of clothing 
すそあき	0	0.0%
スソアキ	205	23.9% - WWW hits are for go
スソ開き	62	7.2% - WWW images are of clothing 
スソ空き	31	3.6% - Eijiro ({Go} opening on the side), WWW hits are for go
スソあき	41	4.8%
裾空き	66 - eijiro,

Maybe this. I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -4,0 +5,8 @@
+<keb>スソ空き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>裾空き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -7,3 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>すそあき</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +19,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すそあき</reb>
@@ -18 +26,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. スソアキ</s_inf>
@@ -20 +28 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">an opening on one or both sides of edge territory, allowing opponent to jump in</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">opening on one or both sides of edge territory, allowing opponent to jump in</gloss>

https://senseis.xmp.net/?OpenSkirt
https://www.ntkr.co.jp/igoyogo/yogo_480.html

六死八生	131

Expression, I think.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

https://www.godictionary.net/term/rokushihasshou.html
https://senseis.xmp.net/?SixDieButEightLive
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/六死八活

Should this be classified as idiom or expression?

医学英和辞典

研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Shinsen: 古語
Nikkoku dating: End of 10th C; 1001~1014, around 13th century; around 1331

Hits in the NDL are generally in works about classical literature, like the 徒然草 or the 源氏物語
https://dl.ndl.go.jp/search/searchResult?accessRestrictions=internet&accessRestrictions=ooc&accessRestrictions=inlibrary&collection=A00001&collection=A00002&collection=A00022&collection=A00003&collection=A00014&collection=A00015&collection=A00188&collection=A00017&collection=A00016&collection=A00019&collection=A00121&collection=A00024&collection=A00152&collection=A00150&collection=A00173&collection=A00122&collection=A00162&collection=B00000&keyword=世の覚え&fullText=true&eraType=AD&availableType=Persend&identifierItem=ISBN&includeVolumeNum=true&pageNum=0&pageSize=20&sortKey=SCORE&displayMode=list

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>public estimation</gloss>

NEW斎藤和英大辞典

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/word/塾頭-528273#w-528273

daijs

塾頭	15391

https://kotobank.jp/word/御旗-639462#w-639462

daijs

御旗	42293	64.9%
錦の御旗	22850	35.1%

Commonly in the phrase 錦の御旗 but maybe worth its own entry

https://kotobank.jp/word/閉鎖花-128919#w-624015

daijs, ブリタニカ

閉鎖花	5748

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>villainous taxi driver</gloss>
+<gloss>dishonest taxi driver</gloss>

国語大辞典; 研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Eijirō Hata (1928.9.10-2023.8.4)</gloss>
+<gloss>Eijirō Hata (1928.9.10-2023.8.4; politician)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/畑英次郎

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Hataei Jirou (1928.9-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Eijirō Hata (1928.9.10-2023.8.4)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/藤井比早之