Daijirin: 闘牛

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corrida
>> cor·​ri·​da: bullfight

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>bullfight</gloss>

Meikyo, Smk, Sankoku

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

Daijs and koj have うたげ for 讌.

Not kyuujitai, so [oK] -> [rK].

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

OK

DailyConcise: psychological dependence (on another's good will)
Wisdom (very simplified): dependece
Prog: emotional dependence

＊ 心理学辞典
"｢甘え」は元来日本語における日常語であった。しかし，1970年代に精神分析医の土居健郎１９７１が日本人の精神構造や社会文化構造を理解するための鍵概念として用いて以来，学術用語として定着してきている。彼の著作が英訳されたことにより，甘えという用語は世界的に有名になった。広辞苑（第4版）によれば，甘えとは「人の親切・好意を遠慮なく受け入れること」である。学術用語としての甘えもこれとほぼ同様の意味をもち，｢他者に愛され他者の庇護のもとに自由に振る舞いたいという欲求や感情」である。"

Note that shinsen actually splits it:
❶甘えること。
❷自分で責任をもたず、他人にたよろうとする気持ち。

I think the current three glosses don't portray the full picture laid out by the submitter's references. 
I'm not sure it warrants a sense split. It's more so that the cited ressources go into more detail than a typical dictionary entry would.
"attention-seeking (behavior)" doesn't feel all that fitting in my eyes, moved it down.

Maybe something like this?

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>overdependence (on others; usu. one's fosterers or seniors)</gloss>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>depending on others</gloss>
+<gloss>presumed acceptance (of one's behaviour)</gloss>
+<gloss>presumed benevolence</gloss>

GG5: 〔子供の〕 attention-seeking (behavior); making up 《to its mother》; 〔他者への過度の依存･期待〕 (a) lack of self-reliance; (excessive) reliance on others; (over)dependence 《on…》.
中辞典: amae; a tendency to depend too readily on somebody who is close to and older than one, such as one's parent, teacher.

I think it's just one sense.

@@ -16,8 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1213440">甘える・あまえる</xref>
-<gloss>indulgent dependence</gloss>
-<gloss>presumed indulgence</gloss>
-<gloss>presumed acceptance</gloss>
-<gloss>desire to be loved or cared for</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>attention-seeking (behavior)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amae
"Amae (甘え, amae) is a Japanese concept referring to a form of emotional dependence or indulgent reliance on others, often characterized by a desire to be loved, cared for, or indulged by someone perceived as an authority figure or caregiver."

https://interculturalwordsensei.org/甘え-amae/
"Amae is a Japanese term used to describe behavior and emotion which can be translated as “presumed indulgence” ..."
"... amae can be defined as “presumed acceptance of one’s inappropriate behavior or request” (Yamaguchi & Ariizumi, 2006, p.164). In other words, making a request and expecting it to be accepted (presumed acceptance) even though the request may be inappropriate."

Adding the Japanese culture's view of the word and putting the Western translations into a separate gloss.

@@ -16,0 +17,8 @@
+<gloss>indulgent dependence</gloss>
+<gloss>presumed indulgence</gloss>
+<gloss>presumed acceptance</gloss>
+<gloss>desire to be loved or cared for</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1213440">甘える・あまえる・2</xref>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

黒曜石	59522	91.9%
黒耀石	5129	7.9%
黒燿石	133	0.2%
黒曜岩	478

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,2 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1288200">黒曜岩</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1288200">黒曜岩</xref>

NEW斎藤和英大辞典

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>黒燿石</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>fourth/fifth finger</gloss>
+<gloss>fourth (occ. fifth) finger</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_numbering

Pinky is known as fourth finger and fifth finger depending on context

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>fourth/fifth finger</gloss>

Doesn't appear to be real.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>子指</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 小指　 │ 614,392 │ 98.9% │
│ 子指　 │     733 │  0.1% │ 🡠 not in my refs. Irregular?
│ こゆび │   5,859 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<gloss>to factor in (news, risk, outcome, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="fig">to factor in (news, risk, outcome, etc.)</gloss>

This word was missing a vital definition which has real world usage especially in business. In addition to the literal meaning, there is a figurative meaning which amounts to "folding in" or "adding in" some additional information to something. The translation "factor in" I think works well for the English equivalent.

@@ -26,0 +27,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to factor in (news, risk, outcome, etc.)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Added sense.

@@ -20 +20,7 @@
-<gloss>to fold inside</gloss>
+<gloss>to fold in</gloss>
+<gloss>to tuck in</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to insert (e.g. a flyer in a newspaper)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>折りこむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Hardly random.

That's not, again, at all obvious. The xref seems very random.

Well, it's a related term with the same reading. 革ジャン is often written 皮ジャン.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1483805">革</xref>

not obvious what the point of this xref is

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1483805">革</xref>

Maybe this way.

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>third/fourth finger</gloss>
+<gloss>third finger</gloss>
+<gloss>fourth finger (esp. in piano-playing)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_numbering

References to ring finger as fourth finger are not limited to piano

@@ -23,2 +23 @@
-<gloss>third finger</gloss>
-<gloss>fourth finger (in piano-playing)</gloss>
+<gloss>third/fourth finger</gloss>

薬指	320702	97.9%
くすり指	6842	2.1%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5: 常 親指 (thumb) を除外して人差し指から数えるので “the third finger” となるが, ピアノを弾くときなどは親指から数えて “the fourth finger” を用いる.

My pianist wife confirms this.

@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>fourth finger</gloss>
+<gloss>third finger</gloss>
+<gloss>fourth finger (in piano-playing)</gloss>

The JEs all have second.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>second/third finger</gloss>
+<gloss>second finger</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_numbering

Finger numbering is ambiguous

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>second finger</gloss>
+<gloss>second/third finger</gloss>

splitting senses

@@ -24,0 +25,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -23,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>second finger</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>middle toe</gloss>
+<gloss>third toe</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/再再-507622#w-1974607
https://kotobank.jp/word/再再-507622#w-507622

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>again and again</gloss>

JEs have "first".

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>first/second finger</gloss>
+<gloss>first (occ. second) finger</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_numbering

Index finger is also known as first finger and second finger depending on context

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>first/second finger</gloss>

gg5

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>second toe</gloss>

Made ひとさしゆび a gikun reading of 食指.

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 明るみに出た　 │ 23,972 │ 92.9% │
│ 明るみにでた　 │  1,682 │  6.5% │ - sK
│ あかるみに出た │     58 │  0.2% │
│ あかるみにでた │     95 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Unnecessary x-ref.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1856160">明るみに出す</xref>

we usually do not combine exp and vi/vt

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

G n-grams:
明るみに出る	13114
明るみにでる	 1384
あかるみにでる	   53

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>明るみにでる</keb>

Quiet

I was comfortable with it as it was. There were no references for that middle edit. I'll keep the 有 and [form] additions, approve and reopen for a bit.

@@ -24,10 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&vr;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・2</xref>
-<misc>&form;</misc>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to be (usu. of inanimate objects)</gloss>
-<gloss>to have</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -41,2 +31,10 @@
-<gloss>conceivable</gloss>
-<gloss>(that) could possibly work</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&vr;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1296400">在る・ある・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1296400">在る・ある・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>to be (usu. of inanimate objects)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have</gloss>

Sankoku, Meikyo, Oukoku

Daijr: 
〔動詞「ある」の連用形から〕
あること。存在すること。多く「ありの…」の形で用いられる。

GG5 allows for standalone 有 as well

That edit broke alignment with incoming xrefs (and probably also with example sentences).

Generally I don't think the ラ変動詞 sense should be in an entry together with these senses. E.g. for sense one this entry signifies the 連用形, while it signifies the 終止形 for the classical sense.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

@@ -23,0 +24,9 @@
+<pos>&vr;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to be (usu. of inanimate objects)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -31,9 +40,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&vr;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・2</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to be (usu. of inanimate objects)</gloss>
-<gloss>to have</gloss>
+<gloss>conceivable</gloss>
+<gloss>(that) could possibly work</gloss>

大寄せ	1999	43.7%
大ヨセ	1482	32.4%
大寄	1094	23.9%

From 2866771.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大ヨセ</keb>
@@ -15,0 +19,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1219550">ヨセ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1219550">ヨセ・1</xref>

It's an old meaning.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>calling many harlots and entertainers and having a big party</gloss>
+<gloss>calling many prostitutes and entertainers and having a big party</gloss>

Harlot is an outdated word

Sounds fun.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>calling many harlots and entertainers and have a big party</gloss>
+<gloss>calling many harlots and entertainers and having a big party</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ あり合わせる │ 420 │ 71.6% │
│ 有り合わせる │  59 │ 10.1% │
│ 有り合せる　 │   0 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 在り合わせる │   0 │  0.0% │
│ 在り合せる　 │   0 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ ありあわせる │ 108 │ 18.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<keb>有り合せる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +14,4 @@
+<keb>有り合せる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

koj, gg5

Intransitive.

@@ -24,2 +24,4 @@
-<gloss>to have something on hand</gloss>
-<gloss>to have something in stock</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to happen to be available</gloss>
+<gloss>to have on hand</gloss>
+<gloss>to have in stock</gloss>

n-grams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あり合わせる</keb>
+</k_ele>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────╮
│ あり合わす │ 51 │
│ 有り合わす │  0 │
│ 有り合す　 │  0 │
│ 在り合わす │  0 │
│ 在り合す　 │  0 │
│ 有合わす　 │  0 │
│ ありあわす │  0 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────╯

Very rare.
Hiding all but 有り合わす and 在り合わす.

@@ -5,3 +4,0 @@
-<keb>あり合わす</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -9,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>有り合す</keb>
@@ -16,0 +11,8 @@
+<keb>あり合わす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>有り合す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21 +24 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29,0 +33 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daij, nikk

Aligning with 2462720.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あり合わす</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -25,3 +28,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2462720">有り合わせる</xref>
-<gloss>to have something on hand</gloss>
-<gloss>to have something in stock</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2462720">あり合わせる</xref>
+<gloss>to happen to be available</gloss>
+<gloss>to have on hand</gloss>
+<gloss>to have in stock</gloss>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5, eij

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

Not sure that note is needed.

一番好きなことなので、毎日やっています。
It's my favorite thing, so I do it everyday.

10 years late but other conjunctional particles like から aren't marked that way. Probably better to keep everything aligned.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>following a noun or na-adjective</s_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>so</gloss>

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

Not sure that note is needed.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

I apologize, I must have misread parts of your proposal, because I didn't even notice the pastebin at first.

I don't have any real issue with splitting out separate senses for sentence-initial usage.

The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.

For the だから entry in particular, I'd also avoid repeating "so" and "therefore," and I'm not entirely convinced by some of the more adverbial-sounding glosses. "That's why" and "for that reason" feel like a better tonal match though.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

References below

I also checked for sentences, if I didn't miss any there are:

For sense one
303164_100534
303133_100565
303132_100566
303130_100568
303002_100695
303001_100696
301349_100712

For sense two
      /


.

This time I was the one missing the reply, I just now spotted it.

＞The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.
After taking another look at the corpus counts I provided back then, this seems reasonable.

I'll now submit my proposed changes to なので and ので as edits so it's easier for everyone to supplement or amend them.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なんで</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<s_inf>following a noun or na-adjective</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after nouns or na-adjectives</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +19,13 @@
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>at sentence beginning</s_inf>
+<gloss>because of that</gloss>
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>
+<gloss>accordingly</gloss>
+<gloss>consequently</gloss>
+<gloss>on those grounds</gloss>
+<gloss>that is why</gloss>
+<gloss>for that reason</gloss>

I apologize, I must have misread parts of your proposal, because I didn't even notice the pastebin at first.

I don't have any real issue with splitting out separate senses for sentence-initial usage.

The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.

For the だから entry in particular, I'd also avoid repeating "so" and "therefore," and I'm not entirely convinced by some of the more adverbial-sounding glosses. "That's why" and "for that reason" feel like a better tonal match though.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

Shinsen, sankoku, meikyo

sun ⇒ Sun

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>the sun</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>the Sun</gloss>

I think this is enough. All the kokugos have the same definition: "太陽。日輪。".

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>sun</gloss>
-<gloss>sunlight</gloss>
+<gloss>the sun</gloss>

Koj, Daijr

Splitting from 天日/てんぴ.

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/アルベゾン閃石

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

日本大百科全書; 英辞郎１０３; ＣＤ－科学技術４５万語対訳辞典 英和・和英; wiki

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>あたかまこう</reb>
+<reb>アタカマこう</reb>

https://kotobank.jp/word/あたかま鉱-1499956

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

日本大百科全書

水亜鉛銅鉱	198

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/水亜鉛銅鉱

石淋	146	- daij, koj, nikk	
石痳	0

Obsolete term. Web results refer to traditional Chinese medicine.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>石淋</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,3 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2866801">尿石症</xref>
-<field>&med;</field>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="2129660">尿路結石</xref>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>kidney stone</gloss>
+<gloss>bladder stone</gloss>

石痳	0
尿石症	8103 - GG5, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2866801">尿石症</xref>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

広辞苑 第六版

Daijs: 油で揚げたものを、油の臭みがとれるように、熱湯をかけたり、くぐらせたりすること。
Sankoku: ｟名・他サ｠〘料〙あぶらあげ・厚あげなどを調理する前に、熱湯でよけいな油を落とすこと。

https://www.kurashiru.com/recipes/84408abc-68a3-47f9-991d-df91a5ae6ac2

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 油抜き │ 39.676 │ 91.3% │
│ 脂抜き │  3.770 │  8.7% │Nikk; add; [sK]
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
Sense 2:
Daijr and Nikk: ②洋風陶画の技法の一。洋食器などの上絵付けの際、テレビン油を用いて模様を白く抜く方法。
From my understanding it's a method falling under this category: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resist

Sense 3:
日外35万語科学技術用語大辞典: Oil extractor, oil removal
https://fnakatomi.exblog.jp/10681142/
Nikk: (1)油をしぼり出す道具。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0O6Jb9Zfeek Title: "【竹の油抜き】湿式法と乾式法のやり方"

Grease ⇒ Oil

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脂抜き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -13 +19,12 @@
-<gloss>pouring boiling water over fried food to remove excess grease</gloss>
+<gloss>pouring boiling water over fried dishes to remove excess oil</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&art;</field>
+<gloss>western resist technique in porcelain painting using turpentine oil</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>oil extraction</gloss>
+<gloss>oil extractor</gloss>
+<gloss>oil removal</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/油抜き-426616#w-426616

daijs

油抜き	39676

Already an entry.

大辞林 第三版
 おお よせ （おほ—） [0]【大寄せ】
①囲碁で，中盤戦を終えて寄せの大きな手に着手する段階。
https://www.ntkr.co.jp/igoyogo/yogo_160.html
https://senseis.xmp.net/?LargeYose

I think this does not exist in shogi like yose does but I am not sure, I can only speak for go

Should be OK.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 上絵付け │ 20.659 │ 88.4% │GG5, RP, daijs, daijr
│ 上絵付　 │  2.703 │ 11.6% │Koj; [sK]
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
GG5: 〔陶磁器に模様・彩色を施すこと〕 overglaze painting


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overglaze_decoration

Does this fall under our [art] tag? I've never used it so far

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>てんねんせき</reb>
+<reb>てんらんせき</reb>

英辞郎１０３; ＣＤ－科学技術４５万語対訳辞典 英和・和英; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

GG5, 医学英和辞典
尿石症	8103

チャドクガ	20261	83.1%
茶毒蛾	4107	16.9%

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/チャドクガ
https://kotobank.jp/word/茶毒蛾-566874#w-566874
https://kotobank.jp/word/ちやどくが-3159065#w-1185067

wiki, daijs, ニッポニカ

Arna pseudoconspersa seems to be the more up to date name

菜刀	1992	35.2%
菜切り包丁	3666	64.8%

https://kotobank.jp/word/菜刀-587861#w-587861

daijs - refs to 菜切り包丁

KOD

追い鰹	2629	18.5%
追いがつお	11559	81.5%

https://kotobank.jp/word/追い鰹-448425#w-1494355

daijs

made by adding katsuobushi a second time to deepen the flavor during the cooking process, but kept the definition brief

GG5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>blanket net</gloss>

敷網	5250	86.0%
敷き網	858	14.0%

https://kotobank.jp/word/敷網-72546#w-72546

daijs

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/曹白魚-613715#w-1766929
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilisha_elongata

daijs

曹白魚	67

hard to get n-grams for but certainly uk

A bit obvious.

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ぎょうざの皮</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ギョーザの皮</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +13,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1574430">餃子</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>

餃子の皮	82599	90.3%
ぎょうざのかわ	73	0.1%
ぎょうざの皮	4647	5.1%
餃子のかわ	150	0.2%
ギョーザの皮	3970	4.3%
ギョーザのかわ	0	0.0%

sold under this name in Australia

KOD: kohiki; pottery with clear glaze over white slip.

粉引き	43131	48.3%
粉引	46196	51.7%

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/粉引
https://kotobank.jp/word/粉引き-503881#w-503881

daijs, wiki

https://kotobank.jp/word/あんだーどつぐ-3227249

Looks good to me. Perhaps a business tag works? We don't have one for logistics specifically

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&bus;</field>

Definition sources:
1. https://k-cr.jp/factoridge/news/information_match/
Relevant excerpt:
"情物一致とは、管理者が管理する「情報（データ）」と現場に実際にある「物の数や状態」が一致していることを言います。"

2. https://www.j-motto.co.jp/00000000/column/2022/そして誰も使わなくなった/
Relevant excerpt: 
"在庫管理で難しいのが、「情物一致」です。「情物一致」というのは情報の流れと物の流れを一致させることですがこれが一筋縄でいきません。"

3. https://www.sep1996.co.jp/blog/6045/
Relevant excerpt:
"ロジスティクスの役割は、情報を一元管理して、情物一致（じょうぶついっち）を目指すことです。

情物一致とは、情報と物の流れが一致している状態を指します。"

Sources which specify the reading as じょうぶついっち:
https://shikumika.com/column/情物一致/
https://www.postas.co.jp/makesmiles/2853/


ngrams
情物一致	203

Production Control/Logistics term

I did stumble upon a research paper which uses this term to describe the information management of waste disposal (linked below) but this term is broadly used to describe management of stock numbers in factories/warehouses.
Research link: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/proer2000/33/0/33_0_47/_pdf/-char/ja

Yes, hard to justify.

While this is in gg5, it doesn't get any hits in Google results or in the n-grams.

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

nikk

褐簾石　　　 417 64.6%
褐レン石　　 125 19.3% <- heibonsha
かつれん石　  74 11.5%
褐れん石　　  30  4.6%
かつれんせき   0  0.0%

アラナイト 0

@@ -5,0 +6,11 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>褐レン石</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かつれん石</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>褐れん石</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

* chuujiten
* https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/calcined gypsum
  gypsum partially dehydrated by heat
    specifically : plaster of paris 

{焼,焼き,やき}{石,せっ,セッ}{膏,こう,コウ} 

焼石膏　　　　 833 56.8%
焼き石膏　　　 249 17.0%
焼石こう　　　 169 11.5%
焼せっこう　　  87  5.9%
焼きせっこう　  40  2.7% <- 建築学用語辞典
焼きセッコウ　  34  2.3%
焼セッコウ　　  31  2.1% <- heibonsha
焼き石こう　　  23  1.6%
...
しょうせっこう   0  0.0%
やきせっこう　   0  0.0%

@@ -6,0 +7,27 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼き石膏</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼石こう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼せっこう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼きせっこう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼きセッコウ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼セッコウ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼き石こう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +36,4 @@
+<re_restr>焼石膏</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>やきせっこう</reb>
@@ -12,0 +44 @@
+<gloss>plaster of Paris</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>medicinal soft soap</gloss>

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

britt; マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典

No n-gram hits for all permutations of 〈方／ほう／ホウ〉〈硼／ほう／ホウ〉〈石／せき／セキ〉

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>方ホウ石</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>方ほう石</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&min;</field>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>raddle</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; ＣＤ－科学技術４５万語対訳辞典 英和・和英

* nipponica
* マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典
* 自然科学系和英大辞典

{束,たば,タバ,そく,ソク}{沸,ふっ,フッ}{石,せき,セキ}

束沸石　　　 491
...
そくふっせき   0
たばふっせき   0

スティルバイト 294

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そくふっせき</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>desmine</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; ＣＤ－科学技術４５万語対訳辞典 英和・和英;  研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

daijr/s; nipp; マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典

玉滴石　　　　 236
ぎょくてきせき   0

ハイアライト 58

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>water opal</gloss>
+<gloss>Müller's glass</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

nipp; britt

日長石　　　　 757 96.9%
にっちょうせき  24  3.1%

サンストーン 13,322

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2503900">サンストーン</xref>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 広辞苑 第六版

* マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典
* 自然科学系和英大辞典

灰硝石 0
硝酸カルシウム 1,415

While this is in a decent amount of references, it really only gets some Google hits in a few PDFs.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 日外３５万語科学技術用語大辞典; ＣＤ－科学技術４５万語対訳辞典 英和・和英

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2490260">モレーン</xref>
+<field>&geol;</field>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>iceland spar</gloss>
+<gloss>Iceland spar</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

中辞典

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>oil company owner</gloss>

英辞郎１０３; 研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

Daijirin, GG5, JA Wiki

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ケロイド │ 78,147 │ 99.9% │ - Xref
│ 蟹足腫　 │     74 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixon
>> (January 9, 1913 – April 22, 1994)

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>
@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<sense>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Nixon, Richard (1913.1.9-1994.4.22; US president)</gloss>
+</sense>