I think splitting 圧す and 捺す off is not a bad idea. Before setting it up I thought I'd see if there was support for that.

shouldn't this be split into 押す, 圧す and 捺す?

圧し掛かる is a different usage.
The JEs don't mention 圧す but I don't mind if the [rK] is dropped.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 押し掛かる　 │     21 │  0.1% │
│ 押し掛かって │     29 │  0.2% │
│ 圧し掛かる　 │  8,283 │ 44.4% │
│ 圧し掛かって │ 10,332 │ 55.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

not sure if this example counts ("押し-" is already declared as rarely-used in jmdict), but still i don't think it should be rK

sense 6 (examples from daijr)
雰囲気に押され	2199	82.6%
雰囲気に圧され	462	17.4%

気迫に押され	4019	91.2%
気迫に圧され	386	8.8%

Not convinced by the anonymous editor's argument, but arguably it's not rK for sense 6.

it's relatively unpopular, but overall you see it everywhere and used with other verbs. "捺す" is not only unpopular, but pretty much has only one use

Sorry, but it's only a minute proportion of the 押す usage.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 押す　 │  9,422,430 │ 36.1% │
│ 押した │    752,332 │  2.9% │
│ 押して │ 15,891,397 │ 60.8% │
│ 圧す　 │      4,400 │  0.0% │
│ 圧した │     15,706 │  0.1% │
│ 圧して │     28,256 │  0.1% │
│ 捺す　 │      6,519 │  0.0% │
│ 捺した │      3,511 │  0.0% │
│ 捺して │      9,871 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

"圧す" is too popular to be rK in my opinion

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

押す	9422430
圧す	4400
捺す	6519

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Not the most comfortable entry, with all those restrictions.

daijr, daijs, prog

@@ -46,0 +46,66 @@
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to affix (e.g. gold leaf)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to press (someone for something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to urge</gloss>
+<gloss>to compel</gloss>
+<gloss>to influence</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<stagk>圧す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to overwhelm</gloss>
+<gloss>to overpower</gloss>
+<gloss>to repress</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to push (events along)</gloss>
+<gloss>to advance (a plan)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to do in spite of ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to do even though ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to force</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1900890">念を押す・ねんをおす</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1892630">駄目を押す・だめをおす</xref>
+<gloss>to make sure</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to be pressed for time</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to advance troops</gloss>
+<gloss>to attack</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>(of light) to be diffused across an entire surface</gloss>
+</sense>

saw 當てる in a 1952 book: "...鼻の先に指を當てても通じる" (well known sign for hanafuda, putting your finger to your nose).
but not in daij, nikk. and my windows IME doesn't want to bring it up either.

當てる	304

possibly worth including?

Try and avoid "XXX or YYY" glosses.

@@ -30,2 +30,4 @@
-<gloss>to put on or against</gloss>
-<gloss>to hold on or against</gloss>
+<gloss>to put on</gloss>
+<gloss>to put against</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold on</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold against</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/当てる

I added "to put on or against; to hold on or against" to meaning #3 because it seemed related.  This is the use in a context like "チャールズは片耳に手を当てて、" -- Charles put his hand to his ear -- or "受話器を耳に当てる" -- hold the telephone receiver to one's ear.

@@ -30,0 +30,2 @@
+<gloss>to put on or against</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold on or against</gloss>

surely かん is kanwa? meikyo only has a 造 entry

nikk

@@ -13,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しんぼん</reb>
+</r_ele>

Sankoku has sense 1 as [form]

For sense 2:
https://miyageboshi.world/archives/3193
http://www.tukisekai.co.jp/item/index.html
https://visit-toyama-japan.com/en/travel-inspiration/omiyagematome#section-567

Koj: ②鶏卵と砂糖・寒天で固めた干菓子の名。富山の名菓。商標名。
Nikk: 暁の月をかたどった淡黄色の干菓子。卵黄に和三盆を和したもの。富山市の名産。

.

Seems to be the brand name of the sweet itself

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -22 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>light yellow rectangular sweet</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="tm">Tsukisekai</gloss>
+<gloss>light yellow rectangular sweet (Toyama city specialty)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/月世界-490615#w-571081

daijs

adding second sense for the sweet

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>つきせかい</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18,6 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>つきせかい</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>light yellow rectangular sweet</gloss>
+</sense>

It has just caught my eye that both [5] and [6] are marked as conjunctions, have similar glosses, and both link back to て. It seems there was both a cross-reference from で to て and one from て to で, and that the previous [4] snatched the one coming て when I raised it to [5].
I shifted them around to circumvent this and have also removed the cross-reference leading from here as it was seemed redundant to have them go both ways.

@@ -32,0 +33,7 @@
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>forms conjunction, compound verb or connects auxiliary; alternative form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>
+<gloss>and</gloss>
+<gloss>then</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -36,11 +42,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2654270">て</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2654270">て・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2654270">て・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2654270">て・1</xref>
-<s_inf>forms conjunction, compound verb or connects auxiliary; alternative form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>
-<gloss>and</gloss>
-<gloss>then</gloss>

Approving to match the にて split, then reopening in case we want to consider Nonさん's amendments.

Splitting it out.

@@ -8,4 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>にて</reb>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -14 +10 @@
-<s_inf>indicates location of action; にて is the formal literary form</s_inf>
+<s_inf>indicates location of action</s_inf>
@@ -42 +37,0 @@
-<stagr>で</stagr>
@@ -54 +48,0 @@
-<stagr>で</stagr>

I agree with Marcus that にて should be split out. We've moved away from these sorts of merges in recent years.

daijs, daijr
https://kobun.weblio.jp/

で Is itself a contraction of にて, hence the meanings are identical*. I think keeping it in one entry reinforces the notion that they are related and used as alternates of one another - plus it saves the need for an additional entry that would be essentially copy-and-pasted from this one.

*I cannot recall ever seeing にて used for the sense I have just added and indeed upon searching for an example I could not find many. 
Further, that sense is not even listed under the にて entry for the daij's, which at the very least implicates にて is not commonly used for it.

I also went over to the classical Japanese dictionary of the link above, and it seems にて did not originally hold that meaning.
Still, I do not think much would be gained from a split. Worst case scenario, someone will start using にて left right and centre, but even then, they would at most sound odd while still being understood by any native speaker*. 

*Dialectal variation sold separately.

Separate issue but I think we should undo the にて merge. Even if the meaning is identical (I'm not sure whether that's the case or not), it's a different register.

daijr, particularly on（イ）: 〚（２）動作・作用が行われる時を表す。（ア）動作が行われる時期を表す。「では」「でも」の形をとることが多い。「現在―は，簡単に解決する問題だ」（イ）動作・作用の期限・限度を表す。「新幹線は一時間―二百キロも走る」「一〇分間―答えてください」〛

Added a new sense, made it [4] and moved the previous 4th-6th senses up a number. I acknowledge the note is rather long but "quantifies limits of action" by itself seemed too abstract to be informative and I could not devise anything better. Also made minor alterations to 6 as it was misleading: "indicates continuing action" implicates a progressive action, which is not the case here. I still would like to move [6] over to the て entry as another reading.

Anyhow, as justification for the new sense a few sentence fragments:
”あと十人で終わる” = "Will end/(after)  in ten (more) people"
"五分ですべてを話す" = "Speak everything in/within 5 minutes"
"一回で済む" = "Settle/end in one instance" 
”五人で行く”　= "Go in five (people)"
The existing senses cannot properly account for these uses in the manner they are currently distributed and explained, they could be overhauled but I think this use is sufficiently distinct to warrant another sense.

@@ -30,0 +31,6 @@
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>quantifies limits of action; e.g. time spanned, instances, number of participants, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>within</gloss>
+<gloss>in</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -37 +43,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -41 +48 @@
-<s_inf>indicates continuing action; alternative form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>
+<s_inf>forms conjunction, compound verb or connects auxiliary; alternative form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>

@@ -39 +39 @@
-<s_inf>indicates continuing action; alternate form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>
+<s_inf>indicates continuing action; alternative form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>

"note-ifying." I'm not sure sense 5 belongs in here.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<s_inf>にて is the formal literary form</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates location of action</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates location of action; にて is the formal literary form</s_inf>
@@ -21 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>indicates time of action</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates time of action</s_inf>
+<gloss>at</gloss>
+<gloss>when</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +26 @@
-<gloss>indicates means of action</gloss>
-<gloss>cause of effect</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates means of action</s_inf>
@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>with</gloss>
@@ -38,2 +39,3 @@
-<s_inf>alternate form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates continuing action; alternate form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>
+<gloss>and</gloss>
+<gloss>then</gloss>
@@ -45 +47 @@
-<s_inf>at sentence-end</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at sentence-end; indicates certainty, emphasis, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -47 +49,2 @@
-<gloss>indicates certainty, emphasis, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>let me tell you</gloss>
+<gloss>don't you know</gloss>

Proposing merger of にて. See discussion on 2039380.

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>にて</reb>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>にて is the formal literary form</s_inf>
@@ -29,0 +35 @@
+<stagr>で</stagr>
@@ -35,0 +42 @@
+<stagr>で</stagr>

I agree. That sort of thing is more relevant to a dictionary of grammar and usage.

I don't think　で itself in that sentence has any meaning 
beyond "is". You could say "Carl being Carl" in English 
for example. 

That said, I think "is" could be more explicitly define. 
I mean just like with the -て form there's a suggestion 
of causality/time but basically, doesn't it mean "is x, 
and..." rather than just "and then"?

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/21167

this entry probably should have ～は～で (also ～も～で) but I'm unsure how to phrase it

please use proper notes when appropriate

@@ -38,0 +38,1 @@
+<s_inf>at sentence-end</s_inf>
@@ -39,1 +40,1 @@
-<gloss>(at sentence end) indicates certainty, emphasis, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>indicates certainty, emphasis, etc.</gloss>

not really used for request in the same way as　よ
○「来てよ」　×「来てで」

@@ -39,1 +39,1 @@
-<gloss>(at sentence end) indicates certainty, emphasis, contempt, request, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>(at sentence end) indicates certainty, emphasis, etc.</gloss>

大阪弁普及会
"そうやで"　504,000 results
etc.

@@ -35,0 +35,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2029090">よ・1</xref>
+<dial>&ksb;</dial>
+<gloss>(at sentence end) indicates certainty, emphasis, contempt, request, etc.</gloss>
+</sense>

adding a note

@@ -32,0 +32,1 @@
+<s_inf>alternate form of 〜て used for some verb types</s_inf>

Matching 2654270.

@@ -29,0 +29,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654270">て</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654270">て</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654270">て</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654270">て</xref>
+<gloss>indicates continuing action</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

酒気を帯びる	82
酒気を帯びている	6504
GG5: 酒気を帯びている be drunk; be intoxicated; be inebriated; be under the influence of alcohol; 《米》《口》 be loaded.
中辞典, etc. too.

Propose changing this to the far more common and useful form.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>酒気を帯びる</keb>
+<keb>酒気を帯びている</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>しゅきをおびる</reb>
+<reb>しゅきをおびている</reb>
@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>to tie one on</gloss>
-<gloss>to get drunk</gloss>
+<gloss>to be drunk</gloss>
+<gloss>to be intoxicated</gloss>
+<gloss>to be inebriated</gloss>
+<gloss>to be under the influence of alcohol</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

Entry created

I didn't mean this to come across as "your changes are wrong", so I hope it didn't. It was more of "this could've also happened, and maybe we should have this in some way", though I realize this entry is probably not the best place, anyway.

I also didn't know that it's barely productive/deemed unacceptable, do you happen to have any (recommendations/links for) resources on that topic? 
They would certainly interest me.

さす Is not a productive causative auxiliary in standard modern Japanese be it short or otherwise, and is outright deemed unacceptable by the vast majority of speakers outside of archaisms, in which case it is always 二段.
It can be a causative auxiliary in certain dialects of western Japan - some of which even shifted its paradigm from 二段 to 五段 - but it is not really a shorter causative, it is just the causative of those dialects.
In any case, this entry refers to a standalone, seemingly non-dialectal 五段 verb; the other senses, though applicable to the 五段 causative auxiliary of some dialects, would need the appropriate dialect tag (which I do not think we even have) and should probably be their own entry anyway.

The status of す as a "short causative" auxiliary is also debatable, it is not nearly as productive as せる・させる, does not descend from the archaic 二段 す and is not really indicating causation but rather transitivity.
The reason it is reinterpreted as a causative (or vice versa) is due to semantic overlap between a transitive verb and an intransitive causative.

I will hold off the urge to write 2 paragraphs on this as the previously linked Imabi page, "Causative Form Issues", already goes over that nicely.

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/28522/shorter-causative-form-popularity
https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/78130/how-acceptable-is-it-to-use-持たす-instead-of-持たせる?noredirect=1&lq=1
https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/78032/how-was-組まされた-conjugated

Sankoku:
さ・す
｟助動(五型)｠〔使役(しえき)の助動詞。上一段・下一段・カ変の動詞につく〕
  「させる」の話しことば的・方言的な形。
    「子どもに食べ━・ここへかけさしてください」
   区別 ⇨す。

区別　す:
「言わさない」 「言わして」 「言わす」など「す」を使う形は、「言わせない」 「言わせて」 「言わせる」など「せる」を使う形よりも、一般(いっぱん)に話しことば的・方言的。
「言わす」など終止形は、下二段活用の文語助動詞「す」をつけた形と同じなので、文語的にもなる。助動詞「さす」と「させる」の関係も同じ。


Shinsen and most other refs:
さす
助動〘古語〙(サセ｜サセ｜サス｜サスル｜サスレ｜サセヨ)
〔一、二段活用・サ変・カ変動詞の未然形につく〕
  ❶他に動作をさせる意（使役）を表す。…させる。
[other senses have been excluded]


Also, Imabi says this (which slightly goes against the references above):

https://imabi.org/the-causative-i-～させる-～せる/
"The 五段-conjugating ～さす・す are corruptions of the Classical Japanese renditions of the 一段-conjugating ～させる・せる, whose 終止形 would have been rendered as ～さす・す. This corruption is only valid for the 連用形, which in turn provides 言わせた・言わした (made…say) as possible forms, albeit with the latter sounding dialectal. Another contending issue as to why 見さす is marked as unnatural/incorrect is that 見さす may be interpreted as 見る + the supplementary verb ～止（さ）す to mean “to pause watching.” " 

https://imabi.org/causative-form-issues/
"There is also the short causative 燃えさす for 燃えさせる, but this form is usually △・X for most speakers."

May or may not have been misconstrued previously, although the former sense 5 is definitely archaic.
It seems most dictionaries don't devote an extra entry to the modern short causative (which is incidentally identical to the archaic causative す・さす, it just has a 五段 conjugation now). 
Even GendaiShinkoku7 and Meikyo3, which are some of the most recent dictionaries, don't bother with it (odd).
But as indicated by Sankoku and the references above (and the fact that I and another person I know encountered the modern short causative pretty early on), there is some relevance.

So there is a distinction to be made here between modern 五段 colloquial auxiliary usage of す・さす, archaic/formal 下二段 auxiliary usage of す・さす, 
and the non-dependent formal or literary verb さす (サ変「す」の未然形「せ」 ＋ 使役・尊敬の助動詞「さす」：せさす ＞ さす.
I assume the first usage is readily distinguished from the second by advanced/native speakers(whom I don't belong to) given the context of usage.

I actually don't have the time right now to propose something, but I will have some later today or tomorrow.
I just thought it might be helpful to have this out here, in case anybody else already wishes to comment on this or propose changes.

Daijirin, Daijisen

This entry has the following issues:
1. While I could find a 五段 verb さす that has no kanji and is a synonym for the causative and permissive senses of させる, it is not an auxiliary verb, making all senses past [1] and [2] dubious.
2. Those senses were most likely made from confusion between the verb above, and the archaic す・さす (antecedents to modern せる・させる).

With the above in mind, I am arguing that [3]-[5] be removed.

@@ -16,21 +15,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<s_inf>aux. verb indicating the causative</s_inf>
-<gloss>to let</gloss>
-<gloss>to allow</gloss>
-<gloss>to cause</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<s_inf>aux. verb indicating the granting of permission</s_inf>
-<gloss>to be permitted to</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<misc>&hon;</misc>
-<s_inf>aux. verb used as an honorific for others' actions</s_inf>
-<gloss>to do</gloss>

Daijirin's definition for our sense 06 ("swidden"):
焼き畑のこと。もと武蔵国に多くある「指谷(さすがや)」という地名はこれに由来するといわれる。

I don't like having a noun sense merged with verbs like this. According to daijirin the etymology is unrelated.
I think it would be better to split it out.

@@ -37,5 +36,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>swidden</gloss>

Trimming a little.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<s_inf>auxiliary verb indicating the causative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>aux. verb indicating the causative</s_inf>
@@ -30 +30 @@
-<s_inf>auxiliary verb indicating that one has been granted the permission to do something</s_inf>
+<s_inf>aux. verb indicating the granting of permission</s_inf>
@@ -37 +37 @@
-<s_inf>auxiliary verb used as an honorific for others' actions</s_inf>
+<s_inf>aux. verb used as an honorific for others' actions</s_inf>

@@ -22 +22,4 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating the causative</gloss>
+<s_inf>auxiliary verb indicating the causative</s_inf>
+<gloss>to let</gloss>
+<gloss>to allow</gloss>
+<gloss>to cause</gloss>
@@ -27 +30,2 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating that one has been granted the permission to do something</gloss>
+<s_inf>auxiliary verb indicating that one has been granted the permission to do something</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be permitted to</gloss>
@@ -32 +36,3 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb used as an honorific for others' actions</gloss>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>auxiliary verb used as an honorific for others' actions</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do</gloss>

Fair enough.

if no editor has any idea what "more active" means, we can't 
expect the users to do either

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2568020">させる・1</xref>
@@ -30 +28,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2568020">させる・2</xref>
@@ -32,7 +29,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2568020">させる・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2568020">させる・3</xref>
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb used to make verbs more "active"</gloss>

sitting for months with no changes.  closing

i think it might refer to this, i.e. transitive vs. intransitive.  meikyo:
自動詞の表す事柄を引き起こす意の、他動的な表現を作る。
「人を疲れ━音」
「心を乱れ━」

does sense 5 overlap with sense 3?  also, i'm not clear on the difference between sense 4 and sense 2

I don't know either what the "more active" means. It was in the original submission.

not "extreme"

@@ -45,1 +45,1 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb used as an extreme honorific for others' actions</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb used as an honorific for others' actions</gloss>

"auxiliary verb used to make verbs more "active"" 
what does it mean, really?

@@ -22,2 +22,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2568010">させる・1</xref>
-<gloss>auxiliary verb indicating the causative</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2568020">させる・1</xref>
+<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating the causative</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +28,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2568010">させる・2</xref>
-<gloss>auxiliary verb indicating that one has been granted the permission to do something</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2568020">させる・2</xref>
+<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating that one has been granted the permission to do something</gloss>
@@ -34,2 +34,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2568010">させる・3</xref>
-<gloss>auxiliary verb used to make verbs more "active"</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2568020">させる・3</xref>
+<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb used to make verbs more "active"</gloss>
@@ -40,2 +40,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2568010">させる・4</xref>
-<gloss>auxiliary verb used as an extreme honorific for others' actions</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2568020">させる・4</xref>
+<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb used as an extreme honorific for others' actions</gloss>

OK.

koj, daij, meikyo

not sure if these are really aux-v or suffixes, or what.  just copying what's already there

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ドン勝
当初は豚カツかカツ丼を混同した結果、ドン勝という謎の食べ物になってしまったと思われていたが、後々の開発スタッフのインタビューやツイッターによると『カツと勝つを掛け合わせたシャレとして意図的に誤訳っぽいものにしたから、直す気は無いよ。』とのこと

The similarity to トンカツ is self-evident, as is the potential inversion of カツ丼. But nikoniko is not authoritative here, and this was coined by PUBG localizers who have (according to the video and pixiv link) disavowed any particular etymology.  It was originally suspected by the Japanese audience to be a *typo* of とんかつ, not a pun at all(this was denied, but that still doesn't mean it wasn't a typo). 

"popularized", while not false, pragmatically suggests that there is some other origin.  That makes it inadvertently misleading.  This term does not predate PUBG, it was created for PUBG. ("coined and popularized", if you prefer)

The English "Winner Winner Chicken Dinner" also needs to be understood in the context of PUBG.  It just happens that this game was/is a massive cultural phenomenon. I was aware of "Winner Winner Chicken Dinner" in this context prior to encountering the youtube video.  If you encounter this in the wild, and are not an FPS player, I think the explicit PUBG connection will be helpful.

I know brevety is prefered, but "coined by localizers of the video game PUBG" was my initial idea, and I still prefer it.

@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>pun on tonkatsu; popularized by the video game PUBG</s_inf>
+<s_inf>possibly a pun on tonkatsu or katsudon; coined by the video game PUBG</s_inf>

https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/ドン勝
This ref says it's a pun on tonkatsu

Adding note.

@@ -34 +34,2 @@
-<gloss>Winner Winner Chicken Dinner (as popularized by the video game PUBG)</gloss>
+<s_inf>pun on tonkatsu; popularized by the video game PUBG</s_inf>
+<gloss>Winner Winner Chicken Dinner</gloss>

Certainly there's a lot to unpack here, many layers of interpretation. I think the reading is a pun on tonkatsu instead of a chicken.

I don't know if mentioning pubg is necessary.

@@ -34 +33,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">made-up food item signifying victory (esp. in FPS video games)</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +35 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">made-up food signifying victory (esp. in FPS video games)</gloss>

Well-researched youtube video:
Japanese Slang Explanation: ドン勝
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyfKUIeDWeA


ドン勝
https://x.com/search?q="ドン勝"&src=typed_query&f=live

ドン勝つ
https://x.com/search?q="ドン勝つ"&src=typed_query&f=live

"ドンかつ"
https://x.com/search?q="ドンかつ"&src=typed_query&f=live

This is in fact a theoretical "food object" (unlike the English expression). Going to go eat some donkatsu:
「PUBG」のんびりドンかつ食いに行く！！　「冬夏３，TAKUMI３」 
https://x.com/HisuiSino/status/1949443031914205475

[vs] usage.  1+ per day.  If you add を you get very few hits (which makes sense as a colloquial use)
https://x.com/search?q="ドン勝して"&src=typed_query&f=live

Adding directly after watching youtube video from Scripting Japan. 

This is a termed coined by a video game localizer that took off. I'm not sure if this is better done as an [lsrc=eng/w:"Localization of Winner Winner Chicken Dinner for the video game PUBG"], but I feel like "Winner Winner Chicken Dinner" is useful as an actual gloss(though not a direct translation).

Seems like the localization team was having a bit of fun with food puns (chicken = victory, katsudon/tonkatsu = victory?), but this is not officially confirmed (see video).

x.com shows many matches per hour on this 8 year old term. No ngrams, popularized after 2017.

Calling it a "food item" (or "food", or "dish", but it's not clear what it is exactly...) is important to understanding the usage ドン勝を食べる・ドン勝を食う, which is quite prevalent.