Aligning with なので.

@@ -13,4 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>that being the case</gloss>
-<gloss>because of ...</gloss>
-<gloss>the reason is ...</gloss>
-<gloss>given that ...</gloss>
+<s_inf>following a verb or i-adjective</s_inf>
+<gloss>because</gloss>
+<gloss>as</gloss>
+<gloss>since</gloss>
+<gloss>so</gloss>

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>the reason is ....</gloss>
-<gloss>given that...</gloss>
+<gloss>the reason is ...</gloss>
+<gloss>given that ...</gloss>

Sankoku also has the following extra senses:
①〔話〕あとをにごす気持ちをあらわす。
「じゃあ、書類はきょう送ります━」
②〔古風〕←のでしょうか。
「いただいてもよろしい━？」
③〔古風〕←のである（よ）。
「ともかくそう信じている━」

And

ので｟接｠
〔古風／俗〕それなので。だから。
「鏡がない。━、窓ガラスに映した」

ーーーーSense 1ーーーー
GendaiShinkoku:［客観的に］
Shinsen:「から」が主観的に原因・理由を述べるのに対し、「ので」は主観を介さずに出来事の因果関係をあらわす。
Meikyo: 「から」と類義だが、「ので」は因果関係を話者の説明（＝理由づけ）が必要なこととして、「から」は説明を要しない自然的なこととして示す。
Sankoku: また、「から」は「つかれたからもう帰りたい」のように、多く下に希望・意志・推量などの主観的な内容が来るが、「ので」は「つかれたので早く帰った」のように、多く下に客観的な事実が来る。「…だろうから」 「なぜなら…からだ」などの表現には「ので」は使えない

Oukoku: 同じように原因・理由を示す「から」に比べて客観的な意をもつといわれる。
Iwakoku:「から」とは違い、前件と後件とを主観的に結びつける場合には使えない。
Nikkoku:「から」との違いについては、「から」が二つの事柄に主観的に因果関係を持たせるのに対し、「ので」は客観的な必然の因果関係、自然の流れのようなものを追うのに用いられるという〔永野賢「『から』と『ので』はどう違うか」（国語と国文学‐昭和二七年三月）〕

ーーーーSense 2ーーーー
BCCWJ:
(文頭から)｛の｝｛で｝｛、｝＝ 65

Sankoku, as above:
ので｟接｠
〔古風／俗〕それなので。だから。
「鏡がない。━、窓ガラスに映した」

ーーーーSentencesーーーー
As expected there are a bajillion (1694) sentences for sense one, but on the other hand I didn't spot any for sense two.
Neither did I see any with ので in sentence final position.

.

The "and slightly more formal" part could maybe be removed from the note, perhaps too specific for a J-E dictionary.
The "more objective" part seems to be the main difference.

The reason I changed Sean's note is that I believe it's clearer to say "in case X it becomes なので, and in all other cases Y it's this right here".
The previous note also technically didn't include 連体詞.

As for the extra senses in sankoku, I've only included the last one for now. 
Unfortunately, as there are no misc tag modifiers (yet), the〔古風／俗〕had to go in the note.
The other three seem like they may be a tad bit more tricky, and I don't want to clutter it more than I already have.

Sankoku sadly appears to be the only kokugo being this scrutinizing with PoSs and sense splits.

@@ -13 +13,7 @@
-<s_inf>following a verb or i-adjective</s_inf>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827864">なので</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827864">なので</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827864">なので</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827864">なので</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827864">なので</xref>
+<s_inf>なので after nouns or na-adjectives; more objective and slightly more formal than から</s_inf>
@@ -17,0 +24,12 @@
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>at sentence beginning; dated or colloquial</s_inf>
+<gloss>because of that</gloss>
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>
+<gloss>accordingly</gloss>
+<gloss>consequently</gloss>
+<gloss>on those grounds</gloss>
+<gloss>that is why</gloss>
+<gloss>for that reason</gloss>

Aligning with なので.

@@ -13,4 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>that being the case</gloss>
-<gloss>because of ...</gloss>
-<gloss>the reason is ...</gloss>
-<gloss>given that ...</gloss>
+<s_inf>following a verb or i-adjective</s_inf>
+<gloss>because</gloss>
+<gloss>as</gloss>
+<gloss>since</gloss>
+<gloss>so</gloss>

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>the reason is ....</gloss>
-<gloss>given that...</gloss>
+<gloss>the reason is ...</gloss>
+<gloss>given that ...</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

ウインカー 318,924  66.9% 
ウィンカー 152,807  32.0% 
ウインカ　   3,245   0.7% - sk
ウィンカ　   2,089   0.4% - sk

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I think it was a brand of car.

Simplified glosses.
Removed first sense. No idea what it was referring to.

@@ -20,6 +20,4 @@
-<gloss>Winker (automobile)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>(car) blinker</gloss>
-<gloss>(car) turning indicator</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">winker</lsource>
+<gloss>(car) turn signal</gloss>
+<gloss>blinker</gloss>
+<gloss>indicator</gloss>

Alternatives.

@@ -11,0 +11,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウインカ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウィンカ</reb>

OK

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 亜剌比亜 │     236 │  0.0% │
│ 亞剌比亞 │      38 │  0.0% │
│ 亜拉毘亜 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ アラビア │ 596.906 │100.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Both are very rare, I think having the 新字体 (亞 is 旧字体 if I see this right?) form visible is enough, 亞剌比亞 being ateji too is easily inferable. 
On top of that I don't see 亞剌比亞 in refs (apart from the fake entry in the yomitan daijs), and 亞 is currently hidden in the 亜 entry as well, should stay consistent here.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

亞剌比亞	38

Or perhaps [sK]?

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<keb>亜拉毘亜</keb>
+<keb>亞剌比亞</keb>
@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>亜拉毘亜</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

亜剌比亜	236
亜拉毘亜	No matches
アラビア	596906

@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijs, koj

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

@@ -37,0 +38 @@
+<stagr>そば</stagr>
@@ -41 +42 @@
-<gloss>Chinese-style noodles</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese-style wheat noodles</gloss>

daijirin, meikyo, sankoku, smk, iwakoku, etc. have そば marked as 熟字訓.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

GG5

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 消費者 │ 8.307.995 │100.0% │that's a lotta hits
│ 需要家 │    49.888 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

Sankoku: 
①〘経〙ものを買うがわの人。
「━心理・━物価指数〔＝消費者の買うおもな品目を選んで、物価の水準を測定した数字〕」
②〘生〙食物連鎖(れんさ)で、植物が生産した有機物を食べるもの。つまり、動物。〔その死骸(しがい)を分解する微生物(びせいぶつ)が、分解者〕

Genius: buyer, consumer, user
GG5, etc.

@@ -18 +18,10 @@
-<gloss>consumer</gloss>
+<field>&bus;</field>
+<gloss>consumer (of a product, service, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>customer</gloss>
+<gloss>(end) user</gloss>
+<gloss>buyer</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ecol;</field>
+<gloss>consumer (in a food chain)</gloss>

Sankoku: 
①〘経〙ものを生産するがわの人。
「農業━」
②〘生〙食物連鎖(れんさ)で、有機物を作るもの。つまり、植物。
（↔消費者）

リーダーズ+プラスV2 has both senses as well

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 生産者 │ 1.894.928 │100.0% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&bus;</field>
@@ -17,0 +19,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ecol;</field>
+<gloss>producer (in a food chain)</gloss>

gg5; genius; wisdom

The J-Es lead with "producer".

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>producer</gloss>
+<gloss>grower</gloss>
+<gloss>maker</gloss>
@@ -15 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>producer</gloss>

I agree. Done.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>まずい</reb>
@@ -33 +29,0 @@
-<stagr>つたない</stagr>

shouldn't まずい be handled as a note in 1495000 sense 2 instead?

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Looks a bit odd early in the list.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>poor</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>poor</gloss>

wisdom

[2] may also be uk

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>poor</gloss>

Sankoku:〖物〗光・電磁波などが一つの媒質を通って、他の媒質との境の面に到達すること。
Chuujiten, GG5, Prog, Readers, Genius:【物】 incidence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_incidence_(optics)#:~:text=The angle of incidence, in,microwave, and X-ray.

I don't see a non-scientific sense in refs, "input" and "injection" sound like 直訳 to me

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&physics;</field>
@@ -14,6 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>injection</gloss>
-<gloss>input</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>incident</gloss>

GG5, Readers, 25万語医学用語大辞典 英和/和英

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>

同士打ち　  1,613   6.9% 
同士討ち　 19,273  82.0% - move up
同士打　　     68   0.3% - sK
同士討　　  2,339  10.0% - sK
どうしうち     89   0.4% 
どしうち　    112   0.5% 

jpdb frequency:
https://jpdb.io/search?q=同士討ち
同士討ち　95%
同士打ち　 3%
同士討　　 1%
同士打

Google suggests 同士討ち when googling 同士討. I think we can hide it together with 同士打.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>同士討ち</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10 +13,2 @@
-<keb>同士討ち</keb>
+<keb>同士討</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,3 +18 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>同士討</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5

@@ -24 +24,3 @@
-<gloss>a gossip</gloss>
+<gloss>gossip</gloss>
+<gloss>tattletale</gloss>
+<gloss>scandal-monger</gloss>

The "night watchman" sense is probably obsolete. Sankoku and shinsen prefix that sense with "昔、…", and shinmeikai only mentions it as an etymology note.

〈金／鉄／かな／カナ〉〈棒／ぼう／ボウ／ボー〉〈引（き）／曳（き）／ひき／ヒキ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 金棒引き　　 │ 440 │ 75.6% │
│ 金棒引　　　 │  64 │ 11.0% │ - add
│ 金棒曳き　　 │  42 │  7.2% │ - add
│ 鉄棒引き　　 │   0 │  0.0% │ - rK (most kokugos)
│ かなぼうひき │  36 │  6.2% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>金棒引</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>金棒曳き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

Prog, GG5, Sankoku, etc.

Shinsen, Smk, Meikyo, etc. : （↔横組み）

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1719710">横組み</xref>
+<field>&print;</field>

https://kotobank.jp/word/縦組-561568#w-561568

縦組み	12759	76.0%
縦組	4034	24.0% - adding

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>縦組</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 横組み │ 8.864 │ 68.9% │
│ 横組　 │ 4.008 │ 31.1% │Basically all the kokugos allow this variant; add
╰─ーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Sankoku, Shinsen, Smk, etc. : （↔縦組み）

Sankoku, GG5: 〘印刷〙

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>横組</keb>
@@ -15,0 +19,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1709500">縦組み</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1709500">縦組み</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1709500">縦組み</xref>
+<field>&print;</field>

merging into id 2341547

複座　 17,496  92.1% 
複坐　     40   0.2% - rK (daijs)
ふくざ  1,451   7.6%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij, koj

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>複坐</keb>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>two-seater</gloss>
+<gloss>two-seater (e.g. aircraft)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ぼろ糞　 │  2,478 │  1.9% │ add sK
│ ボロ糞　 │  1,549 │  1.2% │ add
│ 襤褸糞　 │     73 │  0.1% │
│ ボロクソ │ 97,151 │ 75.8% │ move up
│ ぼろくそ │ 26,967 │ 21.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ぼろ糞</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,3 +8,8 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ぼろくそ</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ぼろ糞</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ボロ糞</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +19,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぼろくそ</reb>

ボロクソな	1972	3.5%
ボロクソに	52966	94.6%
ボロクソの	1076	1.9%


ボロクソに言われる	2494	55.5%
ボロクソ言われる	2003	44.5%


ボロクソ言って	4123	43.9%
ボロクソに言って	5265	56.1%

Usage is mostly adv as に. Not sure how this entry should be dealt with really but [adj-na,n] is maybe an OK compromise until somebody else can come up with something better.

Answering my own question: I think it's OK.
Sense [1]: ボロクソな評判 - bad reputation
Sense [2]: ボロクソな扱い - demeaning treatment
           ボロクソな侮辱 - disparaging insult

Is sense [2] really adj-na? I see a lot of adverbial examples in
the refs, and I assume that's what this sense is referring to.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| ボロ糞　 |  1,549 |  1.2% |
| ぼろ糞　 |  2,478 |  1.9% |
| 襤褸糞　 |     73 |  0.1% | <- in daijr/s, koj, nikk, mk, gg5
| ぼろくそ | 26,967 | 20.7% |
| ボロクソ | 97,151 | 74.5% |
| ボロくそ |  1,983 |  1.5% |
| ぼろクソ |    137 |  0.1% |

Not marking 糞 as [rK] since it's in >3% of usages

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, sankoku

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Entry created

OK

I could go either way with the exp tag. Even ので is technically a combination of の + で, although most people learn it as a single particle like から.

Shinsen, smk, etc.

relevant for 形容動詞 or post-copula usage in general

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>may carry an apologetic connotation</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the attributive form of a verb or adjective; may carry an apologetic connotation</s_inf>

接続助詞

Shinsen, sankoku, meikyo, smk, etc.

I don't think this needs an [exp] tag, most refs avoid it, だから doesn't have one either.
Though I must concede that it borders on drawing a line in the sand, as for e.g. ものだから, the situation is opposite with most references tagging 連語.
But unless there are objections I would just align with the references.

There is no need to have "indicates an explanation, reason", the glosses are very clear on that.
The third part, however, may be useful to have in a usage note, compare e.g. meikyo: 言い訳がましく理由を示す。…ものだから。

I also don't see what that xref to ので accomplishes, there is no derivational relationship between もので and ので.

もんで is another possible application of reading misc tags, as virtually every reference notes that it is 砕けた言い方

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1009970">ので</xref>
-<s_inf>indicates an explanation, reason, or excuse</s_inf>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>may carry an apologetic connotation</s_inf>

Not really a computing term.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Entry created

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/無停電電源装置

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 無停電電源装置 │ 68,017 │
│ 無停電電源　　 │ 72,164 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

Not really a computing term.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>Uninterruptible Power Supply</gloss>
+<gloss>uninterruptible power supply</gloss>

Entry created

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

Entry created

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Unidic treats 掘立 as a variant of 掘っ立て.

Interesting

掘立柱	16511	91.3% - adding
掘っ立て柱	1386	7.7%
掘っ建て柱	183	1.0%

https://kotobank.jp/word/掘立柱-133542#w-1416281

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掘立柱</keb>
+</k_ele>

Entry created

N-gram

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for アンデッドガール・マーダーファルス.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つじ馬車</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

wiki gg5 koj, etc.

It's for hire, not just a carriage.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>horse-drawn carriage</gloss>
+<gloss>(horse-drawn) cab</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>fiacre</gloss>

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

Not sure that note is needed.

一番好きなことなので、毎日やっています。
It's my favorite thing, so I do it everyday.

10 years late but other conjunctional particles like から aren't marked that way. Probably better to keep everything aligned.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>following a noun or na-adjective</s_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>so</gloss>

i think it should be [conj] rather than [prt]

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

Not sure that note is needed.

一番好きなことなので、毎日やっています。
It's my favorite thing, so I do it everyday.

10 years late but other conjunctional particles like から aren't marked that way. Probably better to keep everything aligned.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>following a noun or na-adjective</s_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>so</gloss>

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

Not sure that note is needed.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

I apologize, I must have misread parts of your proposal, because I didn't even notice the pastebin at first.

I don't have any real issue with splitting out separate senses for sentence-initial usage.

The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.

For the だから entry in particular, I'd also avoid repeating "so" and "therefore," and I'm not entirely convinced by some of the more adverbial-sounding glosses. "That's why" and "for that reason" feel like a better tonal match though.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

References below

I also checked for sentences, if I didn't miss any there are:

For sense one
303164_100534
303133_100565
303132_100566
303130_100568
303002_100695
303001_100696
301349_100712

For sense two
      /


.

This time I was the one missing the reply, I just now spotted it.

＞The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.
After taking another look at the corpus counts I provided back then, this seems reasonable.

I'll now submit my proposed changes to なので and ので as edits so it's easier for everyone to supplement or amend them.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なんで</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<s_inf>following a noun or na-adjective</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after nouns or na-adjectives</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +19,13 @@
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>at sentence beginning</s_inf>
+<gloss>because of that</gloss>
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>
+<gloss>accordingly</gloss>
+<gloss>consequently</gloss>
+<gloss>on those grounds</gloss>
+<gloss>that is why</gloss>
+<gloss>for that reason</gloss>

I apologize, I must have misread parts of your proposal, because I didn't even notice the pastebin at first.

I don't have any real issue with splitting out separate senses for sentence-initial usage.

The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.

For the だから entry in particular, I'd also avoid repeating "so" and "therefore," and I'm not entirely convinced by some of the more adverbial-sounding glosses. "That's why" and "for that reason" feel like a better tonal match though.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

KOD, RP 
インスタントココア	969

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>インスタント・ココア</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>instant chocolate</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">instant cocoa</lsource>
+<gloss>drinking chocolate</gloss>

https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/インスタントココア/
https://kakaku.com/ranking/drink/0016_0036/0003/
https://sakidori.co/article/1036677

I'd keep it for text-glossing. Otherwise there are partial matches with チョコレートパン and チョコレートパフェ.

カカオパウダー 4,245

I think this one can go too. Also A+B, and less common.

チョコレートパウダ	0
チョコレートパウダー	885

More likely this.

@@ -5 +5,4 @@
-<reb>チョコレートパウダ</reb>
+<reb>チョコレートパウダー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チョコレート・パウダー</reb>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>chocolate powder</gloss>
+<gloss>powdered chocolate</gloss>

See also カカオパウダー (cacao powder)

https://tomiz.com/tags/チョコレート,パウダー
https://cookpad.com/jp/search/チョコレートパウダー
https://search.kakaku.com/チョコレート パウダー 業務用/

25万語医学用語大辞典 英和/和英: absorbance (n)【物理】；absorbancy (n)【物理】；extinction (n)【診療;基医;物理】；optical density (n)【物理】
Daijr: 物体の光吸収の度合を表す数値。物体中を光が通過するときの、入射光強度と透過光強度の比の対数で表す。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorbance

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>extinction</gloss>
+<gloss>optical density</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/吸光度
https://kotobank.jp/word/吸光度-52010#w-52010

吸光度	17406

リーダーズ+プラスV2: 2 【生態】 消費者
ビジネス技術実用英語大辞典第4版: じゅようか【需要家, 需用家】; a customer, a consumer, a user, an end user 
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 需要家 │ 49.888 │ 97.0% │
│ 需用家 │  1.559 │  3.0% │we have this in a separate entry; merge in; [rK]
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>需用家</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>consumer</gloss>
+<field>&bus;</field>
+<gloss>consumer (of a product, service, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +19,6 @@
+<gloss>end user</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ecol;</field>
+<gloss>consumer (in a food chain)</gloss>

GG5

ビジネス技術実用英語大辞典第４版; 研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 獣疫 │ 5.820 │ 79.7% │GG5, Shinsen, Smk, etc.
│ 牛疫 │ 1.479 │ 20.3% │We have this
╰─ーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Aligning glosses with 牛疫

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>cattle plague</gloss>

NEW斎藤和英大辞典

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12,8 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<gloss>to get irritated</gloss>
+<gloss>to get annoyed</gloss>
+<gloss>to chafe</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
@@ -13 +21 @@
-<gloss>to chafe</gloss>
+<gloss>to mediate</gloss>

大辞林　第四版; デジタル大辞泉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 反足細胞 │ 159 │100.0% │岩波 生物学辞典 第4版; リーダーズスペシャル; Britannica; Nikkoku
╰─ーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯
https://www.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/~algae/BotanyWEB/embryo_sac.html#:~:text=こととなる。-,反足細胞,退化する場合がある。

In a plant's embryonic sac, antipodal cells are (often three) cells on the opposide side of the micropyle.

Prog, Readers special, 岩波 生物学辞典 第4版, マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典-第3版-, GG6EJ

For some reason I couldn't really find a confirmed reading in these references, but in another entry in 岩波 生物学辞典 they confirm it to be ごうてん

In a plant ovule, the chalaza is the intermediate part of the funicle and the integuments. It is located opposite to the micropyle

GG5

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 短距離弾道ミサイル　　　　 │ 3,176 │
│ たんきょりだんどうミサイル │     0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mil;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/短距離弾道ミサイル

gg5

GG5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>structure supported by posts sunk into the ground</gloss>

掘立柱建物	14135	93.7%
掘っ立て柱建物	946	6.3%

https://kotobank.jp/word/掘つ立て柱建物-3222247#w-787223
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/掘立柱建物

GG5, RP

https://kotobank.jp/word/酒精強化わいん-760008#w-760008
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/酒精強化ワイン

酒精強化ワイン	4930

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/word/咬頭-1314958#w-1314958

咬頭	5003

GG5

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>retaining (after an orthodontic procedure)</gloss>
+<gloss>retaining teeth in position (after an orthodontic procedure)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/保定-630883#w-682629
https://orange-dental.com/mouthpiece/2024/07/20/what-is-retention-which-is-essential-for-orthodontic-treatment-such-as-invisalign/

保定	32331 - also a Chinese city and a name, so skewed, but second sense seems fairly common at least

Sense 3 is not really the literal meaning of 猫またぎ.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 猫またぎ │ 7.754 │ 91.0% │
│ 猫跨ぎ　 │   603 │  7.1% │
│ 猫跨　　 │   161 │  1.9% │smk; add; [sK]
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯
Sankoku and Smk apply [col]

Since this doesn't really fall under [id], are [lit] glosses only applied in those cases then?

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>猫跨</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

GG5, etc.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>unpalatable fish</gloss>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>fish even a cat would ignore</gloss>
+<gloss>fish even a cat won't eat</gloss>

猫跨ぎ	603	3.4%
猫またぎ	7754	43.4%
ねこまたぎ	9514	53.2%

https://kotobank.jp/word/猫跨ぎ-594852#E3.83.87.E3.82.B8.E3.82.BF.E3.83.AB.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.B3.89

〈幽／柚／ゆう／ユウ／ユー〉〈庵／あん／アン〉〈焼（き）／やき／ヤキ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 幽庵焼き　　 │ 5,389 │ 47.6% │
│ 柚庵焼き　　 │ 2,384 │ 21.0% │
│ 幽庵焼　　　 │ 1,485 │ 13.1% │
│ 柚庵焼　　　 │ 1,288 │ 11.4% │
│ ゆうあん焼き │   388 │  3.4% │ - add
│ ゆうあん焼　 │    72 │  0.6% │
│ 柚あん焼き　 │    54 │  0.5% │
│ ゆう庵焼き　 │    31 │  0.3% │
│ 幽あん焼き　 │    28 │  0.2% │
│ 柚あん焼　　 │    22 │  0.2% │
│ ゆうあんやき │   191 │  1.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

No need to display less common okurigana variants even if they're in references.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ゆうあん焼き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,2 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>yuanyaki</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">grilled fish marinated in soy sauce, mirin, sake, and citrus</gloss>
+<gloss>yūanyaki</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">grilled fish marinated in soy sauce, mirin, sake and citrus</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 幽庵焼き │ 5.389 │ 51.1% │
│ 柚庵焼き │ 2.384 │ 22.6% │
│ 幽庵焼　 │ 1.485 │ 14.1% │Shinsen, Daijs, Daijr, Koj; add
│ 柚庵焼　 │ 1.288 │ 12.2% │Shinsen, Daijs, Daijr, Koj; add
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Probably a bit too many hits and refs to hide them

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>幽庵焼</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>柚庵焼</keb>

幽庵焼き	5389	69.3%
柚庵焼き	2384	30.7%

https://kotobank.jp/word/幽庵焼-2131656#w-2229705

Sankoku, etc.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

https://kotobank.jp/word/縮合-77592#w-77592

縮合	41595

I guess so.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 離脱 │ 970.150 │ 97.5% │
│ 脱離 │  24.388 │  2.5% │No small references, kokugos refer to 離脱; [rare]
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
GG5: [...]【化】 〔分子からの原子団の〕 elimination; 〔吸着物の脱着〕 desorption; 【物】 〔電子の〕 detachment.

I feel like desorption could have [chem] and [phys], but for the sake of consistency with 吸着 and 脱着 [chem] is probably better.

25万語医学用語大辞典 英和/和英, Readers

.

Aligned glosses for first sense with りだつ

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1550930">離脱</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>secession</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +19,15 @@
-<gloss>detachment</gloss>
-<gloss>disconnection</gloss>
+<gloss>breakaway</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<gloss>elimination</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<gloss>desorption</gloss>

GG5

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>detachment</gloss>
+<gloss>disconnection</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/脱離-561469#w-561469

脱離	24388

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>shrine for sprits of ancestors</gloss>
+<gloss>shrine for worshiping the spirits of ancestors</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/祖霊舎-90487#w-90487
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/祖霊舎

祖霊舎	3202

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/クエン酸ナトリウム

Fullwidth Latin characters in kanji field

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>ブリリアントブルーFCF</keb>
+<keb>ブリリアントブルーＦＣＦ</keb>

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_blue_FCF

We need a "reading". Maybe this works.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ブリリアントブルーFCF</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5 +8 @@
-<reb>ブリリアントブルーFCF</reb>
+<reb>ブリリアントブルーエフシーエフ</reb>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Brilliant Blue FCF</gloss>
+<gloss>brilliant blue FCF (synthetic colorant)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ブリリアントブルーFCF

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 脱離基 │ 1.899 │100.0% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────┴───────╯
マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典-第3版-
Heibonsha world
科学技術45万語対訳辞典 英和和英
GG5
LSD

I think the gloss should mention downloading.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>online selling of digital products (music, ebooks, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>selling of digital downloads (e.g. music, e-books, software)</gloss>
+<gloss>download sales</gloss>

ダウンロード販売	262785

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>online selling of digital products (music, ebooks, etc.)</gloss>

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ダウンロード販売

GG5: late night opening; staying open until late at night.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>operating late in the night (of businesses, taxi service, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>late night opening (businesses, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>operating late into the night</gloss>

大辞泉

KOD

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>standby power supply</gloss>

大辞泉

GG5 - points to 顔面神経痛

https://kotobank.jp/word/顔面痛-1157452#w-1157452

顔面痛	4924

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/有栖川宮熾仁親王

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/宍戸璣

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/堤功長

https://www.kkr.mlit.go.jp/kyoto/news/press/2024/cekddo0000002r5w.html

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8 +9 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&product;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/パワーエイド

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ハーバライフ

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam