寒気	435286	99.2%
寒け	3406	0.8%

Yes, the references don't merge them.
I'll reindex the sentences.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,5 +17,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かんき</reb>
-<re_restr>寒気</re_restr>
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -24 +18,0 @@
-<stagr>さむけ</stagr>
@@ -29,7 +22,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>usu. かんき</s_inf>
-<gloss>cold</gloss>
-<gloss>coldness</gloss>
-<gloss>cold air</gloss>

i think かんき should be split out
1. even with the "cold" sense i've heard さむけ way more often so the note doesn't seem correct
2. there's an additional "cold air mass" sense (sankoku, gg5, etc.)

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>寒け</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<re_restr>寒気</re_restr>

Sankoku
ゆえ［故］｟名｠
 わけ。理由。
「━もなく落ちるなみだ・証拠(しょうこ)がない━をもって〔＝ないので〕否定する」
｟接助｠
〔文〕理由をあらわす。（…の）ため。
「呼ばれた━行って来る」

Shinsen:
❶わけ。理由。事情。「━あって別れた」
❷〔かながき〕〔助詞的に〕…のため。「なまけた━、失敗した」

Encountered with second sense

I don't see [adv] in refs

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +16,7 @@
+<gloss>grounds</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>because of</gloss>
+<gloss>as a result of</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

G n-grams:
故	1972341
ゆえ	2446035
故に	1255670
ゆえに	1574440
故の	 189198
ゆえの	 306859
故ない　	　　　　355
ゆえない	　　　3022

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

咲き出す	26191	85.0%
咲きだす	4609	15.0%

N-gram

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for ヴァニタスの手記.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>咲きだす</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 人称代名詞 │ 17.565 │ 97.2% │
│ 人代名詞　 │    506 │  2.8% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

[ling] ⇒ [gramm]

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<xref type="see" seq="1730860">人称代名詞</xref>
+<field>&gramm;</field>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

I agree. Done.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>まずい</reb>
@@ -33 +29,0 @@
-<stagr>つたない</stagr>

shouldn't まずい be handled as a note in 1495000 sense 2 instead?

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Looks a bit odd early in the list.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>poor</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>poor</gloss>

wisdom

[2] may also be uk

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>poor</gloss>

底抜け　 106,443  92.4% 
底ぬけ　   4,580   4.0% - sK
そこぬけ   4,223   3.7%

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

There's only one sentence in the collection; for sense 3. I can't find any others I'd be confident adding.

Are there any sentences we can index for at least the first 3 senses?

daij, gg5, prog

Splitting into senses.

@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>bottomless (bucket, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -18,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,3 +26,23 @@
-<gloss>bottomless</gloss>
-<gloss>unbounded</gloss>
-<gloss>abysmal</gloss>
+<gloss>unbounded (good nature, optimism, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>boundless</gloss>
+<gloss>extreme</gloss>
+<gloss>uninhibited</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>imprudent</gloss>
+<gloss>indiscreet</gloss>
+<gloss>undisciplined</gloss>
+<gloss>careless</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2831595">底抜け上戸</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>extremely heavy drinker</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<gloss>freefall (of a market)</gloss>

Almost tempted to split the entry. 天牛 is also read てんぎゅう (same meaning).

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 天牛　　　　 │ 24.795 │ 30.6% │熟字訓
│ 髪切虫　　　 │  1.779 │  2.2% │Shinsen, Smk, etc. ; [rK]
│ 髪切り虫　　 │    727 │  0.9% │Okurigana variant; [sK]
│ 蠰　　　　　 │      0 │  0.0% │Smk, Jawiki; add; [sK]
│ カミキリムシ │ 49.573 │ 61.2% │add; [uk]
│ かみきりむし │  4.146 │  5.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カミキリムシ#概要
GG5: 〔カミキリムシ科の昆虫〕 a long-horn(ed) beetle; a longicorn (beetle); a cerambycid
Heibonsha world: 甲虫目カミキリムシ科 Cerambycidae に属する昆虫の総称

.

Would suggest a note since the main kanji form is jukujikun here with 30% of the hits. Not taggable

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>髪切り虫</keb>
+<keb>髪切虫</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +12,2 @@
-<keb>髪切虫</keb>
+<keb>髪切り虫</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +15,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蠰</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カミキリムシ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +28,2 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>かみきりむし is a jukujikun reading of 天牛</s_inf>
@@ -18,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>longicorn</gloss>
+<gloss>beetle of the cerambycidae family</gloss>

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica</gloss>
+<gloss>crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica)</gloss>

百日紅	72257	38.4%
猿滑	3735	2.0%
猿滑り	781	0.4%
猿辷り	0	0.0% - GG5 for sense 2
さるすべり	32376	17.2%
ひゃくじつこう	396	0.2%
しび	11252	6.0%
サルスベリ	67198	35.7%

Trimming.
Tempted to split off sense 2.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -38,2 +40,2 @@
-<s_inf>usually written in katakana</s_inf>
-<gloss>monkey jump (endgame move where a large large knight's move is made at the edge of the board to reduce territory from the enemy)</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. サルスベリ</s_inf>
+<gloss>monkey jump (endgame move)</gloss>

Reference of how the word is used in English: https://senseis.xmp.net/?MonkeyJump
Reference of how the word is used in Japanese: https://www.ntkr.co.jp/igoyogo/yogo_384.html

remove the long explanation if you don't think it's needed. The note however is only to show that this go term (like most terms in go) is written almost exclusively in katakana and not in kanji.

@@ -31 +31,9 @@
-<gloss>crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica)</gloss>
+<gloss>crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2828936">大ゲイマ</xref>
+<field>&go;</field>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usually written in katakana</s_inf>
+<gloss>monkey jump (endgame move where a large large knight's move is made at the edge of the board to reduce territory from the enemy)</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs

merge

@@ -7,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>猿滑</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>猿滑り</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +16,12 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひゃくじつこう</reb>
+<re_restr>百日紅</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>しび</reb>
+<re_restr>猿滑</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サルスベリ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12,2 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>crape myrtle</gloss>
-<gloss>Lagerstroemia indica</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica)</gloss>

See comment on  1385260.

@@ -36,0 +37 @@
+<s_inf>occ. as 拙い</s_inf>

Both katakana forms can be hidden.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>bad (taste)</gloss>
+<gloss>bad(-tasting)</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, etc.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 不味い │   380,970 │ 12.0% │
│ まずい │ 2,139,440 │ 67.2% │
│ マズイ │   538,078 │ 16.9% │
│ マズい │   124,817 │  3.9% │ potentially sk, in sankoku 
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

meikyo, gg5, daijr/s, etc. only have the "mountain recess", i think it should lead
only archaic and shinkoku (with 古語 tag) in my refs have the third sense, "hon" doesn't seem appropriate here

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,7 +24,0 @@
-<misc>&hon;</misc>
-<gloss>mountain</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>深山</stagk>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&poet;</misc>
@@ -38,0 +33,6 @@
+<s_inf>also as 御山</s_inf>
+<gloss>mountain</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Looks good. I think even with one restriction here it's better to have おやま and みやま separate, because they have different etymologies after all. GendaiRK does it this way too

御山	20379

As suggested in  2580710.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御山</keb>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +28 @@
+<stagk>深山</stagk>
@@ -32,0 +38 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

Meikyo:
❶ 呼び名。呼称。
❷ 〘他サ変〙名前を呼ぶこと。

Smk: 
㊀「そのものに与えられた名前」の意の古風な表現。
㊁━する（他サ）そのものの名前をはっきり口に出して言うこと。

Sankoku has [form] for the first sense

GG5, Saito

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +15,10 @@
+<gloss>epithet</gloss>
+<gloss>title</gloss>
+<gloss>name</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>calling out (a name)</gloss>
+<gloss>calling (for)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 寝タバコ │ 5.458 │ 53.1% │
│ 寝たばこ │ 3.577 │ 34.8% │
│ 寝煙草　 │ 1.074 │ 10.5% │
│ ねたばこ │   162 │  1.6% │
│ ネタバコ │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

If it were rare it'd get [rK]. 寝煙草 is the base kanji form and in every reference I see, 10% hits. [sK] would be very inconsistent

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Marginal

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

煙草/タバコ is actually gikun.

GG5 combines some.

I'd leave it.

こそばい 	6420	16.1%
こしょばい	929	2.3%
こちょばい	1706	4.3%
こそばゆい	30825	77.3%

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11121643781
ベストアンサー：「くすぐったい」ことを「こしょばい」という人はたくさんいます。主に西日本です。

I've nerver heard こそばゆい though but always こしょばい so I don't think it should be rk
Actually I think こそばゆい should probably be split from the other 3 because it's the least similar in pronunciation

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こちょばい</reb>

GG5, 大辞林

Add sense of “embarrassed (with praise)” – given in references, and senior teacher used it in class (same story).

@@ -17,0 +17,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>embarrassed</gloss>
+<gloss>awkward</gloss>
+<gloss>ill at ease (esp. when receiving public praise)</gloss>
+</sense>

伊達メガネ 30,506  44.0% 
伊達眼鏡　 16,950  24.5% 
伊達めがね  5,041   7.3% - sK
ダテ眼鏡　  4,848   7.0% 
だてめがね  4,242   6.1% 
ダテメガネ  7,721  11.1% - sk

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Mazegaki addition (maze3)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ダテ眼鏡</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijr

"eyeglasses" is very American.

@@ -22,2 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>fake eyeglasses</gloss>
-<gloss>non-prescription glasses</gloss>
+<gloss>non-prescription glasses (worn as a fashion accessory)</gloss>
+<gloss>fake glasses</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 責付く　 │    20 │  0.4% │ add rK
│ 責っ付く │     0 │  0.0% │ add rK
│ せっつく │ 4,737 │ 99.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>key-logger</gloss>

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>software that records a user's keystrokes (oft. used for password theft)</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>keylogger</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ キーロガー　 │ 24.648 │ 97.3% │
│ キー・ロガー │    696 │  2.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/key-logger
Daijs and daijr don't indicate wasei

As far as I'm concerned it's just the plain English word

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">key logger</lsource>
-<gloss>software used to note content typed (typically to steal passwords)</gloss>
+<gloss>software that records a user's keystrokes (oft. used for password theft)</gloss>

Is this really wasei? I feel like "keylogger" is the usual term for this in English

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">key logger</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">key logger</lsource>

胸に一物 1,335 20.7%
腹に一物 5,107 79.3%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2866068">腹に一物</xref>

Entry created

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

Not sure that note is needed.

一番好きなことなので、毎日やっています。
It's my favorite thing, so I do it everyday.

10 years late but other conjunctional particles like から aren't marked that way. Probably better to keep everything aligned.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>following a noun or na-adjective</s_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>so</gloss>

i think it should be [conj] rather than [prt]

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

Not sure that note is needed.

一番好きなことなので、毎日やっています。
It's my favorite thing, so I do it everyday.

10 years late but other conjunctional particles like から aren't marked that way. Probably better to keep everything aligned.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>following a noun or na-adjective</s_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>so</gloss>

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

Not sure that note is needed.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

Perhaps not. But it does add value by providing important grammatical context, particularly for beginners, since this is a な + の construction that applies specifically after nouns and na-adjectives.

I apologize, I must have misread parts of your proposal, because I didn't even notice the pastebin at first.

I don't have any real issue with splitting out separate senses for sentence-initial usage.

The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.

For the だから entry in particular, I'd also avoid repeating "so" and "therefore," and I'm not entirely convinced by some of the more adverbial-sounding glosses. "That's why" and "for that reason" feel like a better tonal match though.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

OK

References below

I also checked for sentences, if I didn't miss any there are:

For sense one
303164_100534
303133_100565
303132_100566
303130_100568
303002_100695
303001_100696
301349_100712

For sense two
      /


.

This time I was the one missing the reply, I just now spotted it.

＞The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.
After taking another look at the corpus counts I provided back then, this seems reasonable.

I'll now submit my proposed changes to なので and ので as edits so it's easier for everyone to supplement or amend them.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なんで</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<s_inf>following a noun or na-adjective</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after nouns or na-adjectives</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +19,13 @@
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>at sentence beginning</s_inf>
+<gloss>because of that</gloss>
+<gloss>therefore</gloss>
+<gloss>accordingly</gloss>
+<gloss>consequently</gloss>
+<gloss>on those grounds</gloss>
+<gloss>that is why</gloss>
+<gloss>for that reason</gloss>

I apologize, I must have misread parts of your proposal, because I didn't even notice the pastebin at first.

I don't have any real issue with splitting out separate senses for sentence-initial usage.

The only thing I'd note is that the sentence-initial senses should probably come second, not first.

For the だから entry in particular, I'd also avoid repeating "so" and "therefore," and I'm not entirely convinced by some of the more adverbial-sounding glosses. "That's why" and "for that reason" feel like a better tonal match though.

＊１）Meikyo: ［接］〔新〕前に述べたことを理由として、その帰結を導く意を表す。
                  「明日から早朝練習だ。なので、早く寝た方がいいよ」
Please note that this differs from the Meikyo reference posted below, as this is from the third edition. Which I didn't yet have at the time of writing my initial submission.

＊２）Shinsen:［連語］〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。
                    「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」

.

My point and proposal wasn't about your note in particular. Though I appreciate someone finally nudging it, as I'd somewhat forgotten about it myself.

＞"I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position."
What exactly are you referring to here? I don't quite understand.
The point is that for both だから and なので, but especially the latter, there are two "separate" use cases to look at (for だから there's also the third).
For なので compare ＊１ and ＊２. I won't regurgitate everything here, since the same gist can be taken from what's already been posted below.



Just to make it clear, I am proposing a 4 entry alignment of the なので・ので and だから・から pairs. 
They are all inconsistent right now, both with each other and with the kokugos (on top of the fact that the single sense in this current entry should have [exp,conj]). 
And a not insignificant amount of references take this approach.
Drafts of all four entries are in the pastebin below.


I totally understand why this proposal has been sitting here for this long. After all it spans four separate entries.
Another factor is the, in all likelihood, massive amount of sentences that would need to be indexed and reindexed following this string of edits.
I just want to note that if there is a way in which I could help working on these sentences, I'd gladly do so.


As stated below, the reason I put this forward only in form of a pastebin at first, was to not make it unnecessarily messy right off the bat.
However, as enough time has passed now in my eyes, I'm going to wait a bit after this reply to see if there are any new responses.
And if nothing new comes in, I'll (re)draft and submit my proposed edits and see how it goes. 
I would begin with only two edits, the なので and ので pair, to set things in motion.

I've only just seen this, and I apologize for not responding sooner.

I thought that the usage of だから at the beginning of a sentence would be obvious, but I can see how there could be confusion, since なので is almost never used in that position.

I'm just not sure how to explain that simply in a note. Maybe the entry for だから is already enough, since it clearly has a different meaning than なので? Maybe we could move up "that's why", "for that reason" on that entry?

Shinsen, sankoku, etc. :
㊀連語〔断定の助動詞「だ」の連体形「な」に接続助詞「ので」がついたもの〕原因・理由をあらわす。…だから。「大事なこと━、もう一度言います」
参考くだけた話しことばでは「なんで」となる。
㊁ナ接続前の文の内容を原因・理由として起こる結果を次の文で述べるときの言い方。だから。それで。「今日は仕事が休みだ。━、朝寝坊ができた」
参考「なので」は「だから」に比べて新しく使われ始めた接続詞で、書きことばとしてはまだ十分には浸透していない。

Sankoku: なんで〔話〕

Multiple references note that sentence initial usage of なので is rather colloquial compared to だから
Sankoku: 〔話しことばで使われ、二十世紀末から文章でも増えた用法〕
Meikyo: 《主に話し言葉で》〔俗〕
Smk: 〔口頭語的表現〕


Additional usage data (BCCWJ being the largest, and CEJC the smallest corpus of the three; obtained using 中納言):
BCCWJ = 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス ~104mil words
CSJ = 日本語話し言葉コーパス ~7mil words
CEJC = 日本語日常会話コーパス ~4mil words

なので
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 1520; 28176
CSJ; 105; 1566
CEJC; 146; 333

だから
Corpus; Sentence initial（接続詞）; Non-sentence initial（連語）
BCCWJ; 15041; 44070
CSJ; 1838; 2546
CEJC; 5858; 5085


.

First of all, なので isn't a parallel to から, but to だから. The only difference being that ので takes the 連体形 and から the 終止形, hence it not being だので.
There are really two cases to distinguish here.

1. なので as an conjunctive expression arising from the 連体形 of copula だ after nouns and な adjectives and the 連体形 bound conjunctive particle ので. This is only in references because it's not as obvious.
2. なので as a single conjunction used *at sentence beginning* like だから, which is a rather new usage as indicated by multiple references.


The corpus data further substantiates what the references have already established:
- なので as a 接続詞, i.e. at sentence beginning, is far less common than だから in the same position. In total counts and especially in relation to non-sentence initial usage
  - this also indicates more recent development for that sense in なので as it is not yet well represented in the existing corpi
- だから is more common than なので in spoken language
  - the sentence initial usage being higher than the non-sentence initial usage, in CEJC, is a good indicator for だから sense 3 in the pastebin, as such connotations are far easier supplied using tone
  - this potentially also speaks for the difference in objectivity, and subsequently formality, outlined in references
- non-sentence initial なので is less frequently used in daily conversation than だから

Though technically not necessary, multiple references have an entry for なので in non-sentence intial position, i.e. case one of the above. I believe it's probably worthwhile to have in a dictionary mainly catering towards foreigners learning the language, so as to not lead to ungrammaticalities.


I think the two respective pairs and all four entries, から・だから and ので・なので, can be improved and aligned for consistency. In the pastebin below I have a proposal with references for each of the four. I thought it'd be way less messy than starting four separate edits at the same time.

https://pastebin.com/hesz2mKY

I don't know if there's a way to enable others to participate in editing a paste there, probably not. But comments can be posted.

笠懸	48901	99.9%　- a bit misleading I think because of the city but still more common looking at google results
笠懸け	40	0.1%

https://kotobank.jp/word/笠懸-44071#w-461611
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/笠懸

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>笠懸</keb>
+</k_ele>

daijr: 「かさかけ」とも

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かさかけ</reb>

GG5

Seems to be the only term.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/不可視インク

不可視インク	194	100.0%
隠顕インク	0	0.0%

This is pretty much Daijisen's version.

* meikyo; smk
* saito: Stretching cloth on a board

張り物 1,712 54.4%
張物　 1,434 45.6%

gg5 has "fulling", but it's not the same thing. luminous's "papier-mache" for the second sense is also off.

Fullwidth Latin characters in kanji field

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>ブリリアントブルーFCF</keb>
+<keb>ブリリアントブルーＦＣＦ</keb>

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_blue_FCF

We need a "reading". Maybe this works.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ブリリアントブルーFCF</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5 +8 @@
-<reb>ブリリアントブルーFCF</reb>
+<reb>ブリリアントブルーエフシーエフ</reb>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Brilliant Blue FCF</gloss>
+<gloss>brilliant blue FCF (synthetic colorant)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ブリリアントブルーFCF

Sankoku: 〘映画・放送〙

Most of our [fld=film] tagged entries also have a [fld=tv] tag.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>puppeteering (in film and TV)</gloss>
+<field>&tv;</field>
+<gloss>puppeteering</gloss>

Sankoku

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Daijisen has two senses but they seem very similar.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/操演
https://kotobank.jp/word/操演-2842741#w-3386564

操演	4162

GG5, etc.

https://kotobank.jp/word/相撲茶屋-85073#w-85073

相撲茶屋	78220

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>(leaving) quickly</gloss>

daijs, gendai

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ すたこらさっさと │ 4,416 │ 51.0% │
│ スタコラサッサと │ 4,247 │ 49.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

困り眉	754
https://kotobank.jp/word/困り眉-191072

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>eyebrows resembling the katakana ハ</gloss>

jitsuyou

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/困り眉

https://hinative.com/questions/15975677

困り眉 754

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">mythological ox-headed monster</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">mythical ox-headed monster</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/牛鬼-439538
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/牛鬼

牛鬼	29136

Reverso

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>advance payment</gloss>

事前支払い	34658	66.2%
事前払い	17722	33.8%

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>じぜんばらい</reb>
+<reb>じぜんしはらい</reb>

事前支払い	34658

saw on IIJMIO's site (while logged in)

@@ -26,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>being being pulled in all directions</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">even with several bodies it wouldn’t be enough</gloss>
+<gloss>being pulled in all directions</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">even with several bodies it wouldn't be enough</gloss>

体がいくつあって	3320	  (体_が_いく_つ_あっ_て)
体がいくつあっても	3308	  (体_が_いく_つ_あっ_て_も)

Our count stops at 7 n-grams.
I think it's probably useful.

True, thanks.

Maybe the [lit] gloss is then better like this?

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">even if (I) had several bodies, it wouldn’t be enough</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">even with several bodies it wouldn’t be enough</gloss>

Could plausibly be used for other people than self also?

@@ -25,4 +25,3 @@
-<gloss>I'm stretched too thin</gloss>
-<gloss>I'm being pulled in all directions</gloss>
-<gloss>it’s never enough no matter what I do</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">even if I had several bodies, it wouldn’t be enough</gloss>
+<gloss>being stretched too thin</gloss>
+<gloss>being being pulled in all directions</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">even if (I) had several bodies, it wouldn’t be enough</gloss>

OK. Drop it.

daijr: 光ること。輝くこと。照る。きらめく。

シャイン 75,057

I'm also only seeing it in names, including for the n-grams.

Can't see it in Daijirin or elsewhere, apart from in names.

daijr

腹に一物	5107

sankoku, daijr/s, gg5 (as 腹に一物ある), etc.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スズラン・テープ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>suzuran tape</gloss>
-<gloss>polyethylene tape (for packing boxes, tidying up bundles, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>suzuran tape (for packing boxes, tidying up bundles, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>polyethylene tape</gloss>

スズランテープ	2568

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/スズランテープ

中辞典

https://kotobank.jp/jeword/銀星#w-3193226

銀星	32700

Looks OK.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 胴付き │ 10.451 │ 68.7% │
│ 胴付　 │  4.752 │ 31.3% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
Daijr, Super Daijr:
①枘(ほぞ)の根元周りの平面部分。どうつき。
   https://infinity00.amebaownd.com/posts/6739224/
②「胴付き鋸(のこ)」の略。


Second sense:
科学技術45万語対訳辞典 英和和英
マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典-第3版-
   "[設計] 一方の木片の木目の方向が他の木片の木目に関してある角度をなす(通常90°)ように，これら二つの木片を結合する方法．"
https://constructiontermsx.com/abutting-joint/

Second gloss for second sense may or may not be necessary, I added it since the actual results for "abutting joint" are pretty scarce on google.

KOD

https://kotobank.jp/word/翻案権-666225#w-666225

翻案権	6871

my refs don't tag it as [poet] + aligning

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1641780">深山・みやま・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1641780">深山・みやま・2</xref>
-<misc>&poet;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="1641780">深山・みやま・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1641780">深山・みやま・1</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see">深山・みやま・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1641780">深山・みやま・2</xref>

Furigana.info
読み方	割合
ーーーーーーー
みやま	71.8%
しんざん	26.5%
オクヤマ	0.9%
ミヤマ	0.9%

From 1641780

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 三人麻雀 │ 2.585 │100.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/三人麻雀
Pixiv

See comments on 三麻 submission (2866111)

みこすり半	4477	89.5%
三擦り半	525	10.5%

weblio

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みこすり半</keb>
+</k_ele>

三擦り半	525

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Premature ejaculation</gloss>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>premature ejaculation</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/三擦り半#:~:text=%5E%20“「3擦り半(,www.weblio.jp.

LSD

https://kotobank.jp/word/心外膜炎-162872#w-162872

心外膜炎	1929	19.8%
心膜炎	7820	80.2%

マグローヒル科学技術用語大辞典-第3版-
日外35万語科学技術用語大辞典
25万語医学用語大辞典 英和/和英

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>apex cordis</gloss>

http://kotobank.jp/word/心尖-681691#w-681691
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/心尖

心尖	4924

GG5, etc.

https://kotobank.jp/word/ひす束-3185345#w-1741542
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヒス束

ヒス束	1339

GG5

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>foot drop</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/尖足-88507#w-550479

尖足	3171

GG5

痙性斜頸	5087

https://kotobank.jp/word/痙性斜頸-681298#w-2197608

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/word/眼球突出-48578

眼球突出	5033

ビリングズ排卵法	138

https://japan-lifeissues.net/世界ビリングズ排卵法「日本語website」/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billings_ovulation_method

RP

https://japan-lifeissues.net/世界ビリングズ排卵法「日本語website」/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billings_ovulation_method

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/word/弾糸-564042#w-564042

弾糸	750

南山堂医学大辞典第18版
最新医学大辞典 第2版

Might help for lookups

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>SSS</gloss>

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/word/洞不全症候群-581301#w-581301

洞不全症候群	2860

粥腫	2091	10.7%
アテローム	17533	89.3%

https://kotobank.jp/word/粥腫-678265#w-678265

G n-grams:

全粥　　 4,950 71.6%
全がゆ　 1,926 27.9%
ぜんがゆ    37  0.5%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>全がゆ</keb>

GG5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>soft cooked rice</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/全粥-549497#w-549497

全粥	4950

https://kotobank.jp/word/背筋が凍る-2121950#w-2200467

背筋が凍る	18240	48.3%
背筋が寒くなる	19514	51.7%

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/word/制輪子-546692#w-546692
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/制輪子

制輪子	1860

Er…

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>autocorrelation</gloss>
+<gloss>autocorrection</gloss>

オートコレクトの	3522

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -9,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>autocorrelation</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/おーとこれくと-3208633#w-450346

オートコレクト	9458

GG5, etc.

Split from 1210410.

Should probably also have a [med] tag, [anat] pertains only to its location, not the actual phenomenon itself

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

最新医学大辞典

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apex_beat

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>point of maximum impulse</gloss>

GG5, LSD
心尖拍動	458

Oops

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&geol;</field>
+<field>&min;</field>

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&geol;</field>

https://kotobank.jp/word/緑泥石-150122

緑泥石	4899

KOD

https://kotobank.jp/word/年縞-595861#w-595861
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/年縞

年縞	719

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>snow compactor</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/圧雪車-685339#w-685339

圧雪車	7447

The concept of an imaginary line is used to define the 180-degree rule, but it's not clear to me that "imaginary line" is synonymous with the rule itself. The Daijisen entry only describes the rule as an application of the concept.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>180-degree rule</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/いまじなりーらいん-3222819#w-191915
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/想定線

イマジナリーライン	2879	97.7%
イマジナリー・ライン	68	2.3%

"imaginary line" not used too often for this concept in English I don't think, maybe take out 2nd gloss?

KOD

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">curved spear plane used in woodworking</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">long-handled chisel</gloss>

槍鉋	1288

https://kotobank.jp/word/槍鉋-144410#w-649843

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2120390">ボラティリティ</xref>

https://official.gfs.tokyo/blog/what-is-stock-volatility
ボラティリティ also shows up in the wikipedia disambiguation page for ボラ: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ボラ_(曖昧さ回避)

https://kotobank.jp/word/半群-117970#w-117970

半群	3450

* daijs: 多く複合語の形で用い、農業の、農業関連の、の意を表す。「—事業」
* sankoku: 農業（関連）の。「━事業」

GG5

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Buddhist tradition</gloss>
+<gloss>religious tradition</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/法統-628318

法統	2735

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/word/涙嚢炎-150637#w-150637

涙嚢炎	1639

ハンカチ落し	1308
ハンカチ落とし	8027

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ハンカチ落とし</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>"drop the handkerchief" children's game (similar to "duck, duck, goose")</gloss>
+<gloss>"drop the handkerchief" children's game</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ハンカチ落とし
https://kotobank.jp/word/はんかち落し-1396051#w-1396051

ハンカチ落とし	8027

definition maybe a bit awkward

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/word/受寄者-77573#w-528053

受寄者	3793

医学英和辞典, Igaku, etc.

条虫症	1178

https://kotobank.jp/word/条虫症-2098407#w-2196583

No WWW hits

Provide reasons for the submission.