Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ さ行　　 │ 787.330 │ 69.1% │
│ サ行　　 │ 333.206 │ 29.2% │
│ 左行　　 │   1.920 │  0.2% │
│ 佐行　　 │   1.474 │  0.1% │
│ さぎょう │  15.363 │  1.3% │
│ サぎょう │      60 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Reading field simplification

@@ -22,7 +21,0 @@
-<re_restr>さ行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>左行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>佐行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>サぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>サ行</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://www.google.com/search?q="左行"+"五十音"
https://www.google.com/search?q="佐行"+"五十音"

@@ -9,0 +10,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>左行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>佐行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +21,2 @@
+<re_restr>左行</re_restr>
+<re_restr>佐行</re_restr>

Thanks. Glad to see it go.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ザぎょう</reb>
+<reb>ざぎょう</reb>

I think zeru was supposed to be zuru. 

There's not much to say here. I think the three senses are generally valid.
Better than what it's like now at least, and aligned with the other 〇行 entries.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ ザ行 │ 2.214 │ 59.2% │
│ ざ行 │ 1.529 │ 40.8% │GG5 etc.
╰─ーー─┴───────┴───────╯

This has been sitting here for a while.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ざ行</keb>
@@ -16 +19 @@
-<gloss>classification for ichidan verbs with the dictionary form ending in "jiru" or "zeru"</gloss>
+<gloss>classification for ichidan verbs with the dictionary form ending in "jiru" or "zuru"</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,9 @@
-<gloss>classification for Japanese verb with the dictionary form ending in "zu"</gloss>
-<gloss>"za" column or row of the kana syllabary</gloss>
+<gloss>the "za" column of the Japanese syllabary table (za, ji, zu, ze, zo)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>classification for ichidan verbs with the dictionary form ending in "jiru" or "zeru"</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>in classical Japanese, classification for verbs with the dictionary form ending in "zu"</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ た行 │ 933.121 │ 75.2% │
│ タ行 │ 306.586 │ 24.7% │
│ 多行 │   1.612 │  0.1% │
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Reading field simplification

@@ -17,6 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>た行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>多行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>タぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>タ行</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

http://home.soka.ac.jp/~hkaneko/etxt/gohosinan.html

太行 is also used per google

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>多行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<re_restr>多行</re_restr>

shinsen

ノベル	1365871	99.7%
ノヴェル	3541	0.3%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノヴェル</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

will move to enamdict

The second sense is a company name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell. Normally I would propose it be moved to namedict, but it's not in any of my refs (just this: https://kotobank.jp/word/Novell-12571).

@@ -11,5 +10,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>Novell</gloss>
-</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ は行　　 │ 768.913 │ 68.7% │
│ ハ行　　 │ 348.282 │ 31.1% │
│ 波行　　 │     153 │  0.0% │
│ はぎょう │   1.063 │  0.1% │
│ ハぎょう │      35 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Restrictions not needed anymore

@@ -17,6 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>は行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>波行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ハぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>ハ行</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Indeed.

typo of ペナルティーエリア

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ ま行 │ 707.049 │ 72.2% │
│ マ行 │ 270.909 │ 27.6% │
│ 末行 │   1.994 │  0.2% │
│ 麻行 │       0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Reading field simplification

@@ -22,7 +21,0 @@
-<re_restr>ま行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>末行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>麻行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>マぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>マ行</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/lt/rb/660/660PDF/santo.pdf
http://home.soka.ac.jp/~hkaneko/etxt/gohosinan.html

@@ -9,0 +10,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>末行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>麻行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +21,2 @@
+<re_restr>末行</re_restr>
+<re_restr>麻行</re_restr>

I think mentioning "ye" over-complicates it.

@@ -25,2 +25 @@
-<s_inf>"ye" does not have a standard kana form</s_inf>
-<gloss>the "ya" column of the Japanese syllabary table (ya, yu, ye, yo)</gloss>
+<gloss>the "ya" column of the Japanese syllabary table (ya, yu, yo)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 夜行 │ 916.493 │  N/A  │duplicates
│ や行 │ 556.456 │ 68.8% │
│ ヤ行 │ 252.432 │ 31.2% │
│ 也行 │     166 │  0.0% │
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Reading field simplification.

If we have wi and we in the わ行 entry we might as well have "ye" here. It has existing records of usage unlike yi and wu, which are only hinted at.

But an argument can be made for ye not going in here since it doesn't have a standard kana like wi and we do. Let's see what other people say

@@ -22,7 +21,0 @@
-<re_restr>や行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>也行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>夜行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ヤぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>ヤ行</re_restr>
@@ -32 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>the "ya" column of the Japanese syllabary table (ya, yu, yo)</gloss>
+<s_inf>"ye" does not have a standard kana form</s_inf>
+<gloss>the "ya" column of the Japanese syllabary table (ya, yu, ye, yo)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/lt/rb/660/660PDF/santo.pdf
http://home.soka.ac.jp/~hkaneko/etxt/gohosinan.html

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>や行</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,14 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>也行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>夜行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>やぎょう</reb>
+<re_restr>や行</re_restr>
+<re_restr>也行</re_restr>
+<re_restr>夜行</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +26 @@
+<re_restr>ヤ行</re_restr>

daijr/s

@@ -17,0 +18,6 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1145850">レフトウィング</xref>
+<gloss>right wing (politics)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&sports;</field>

ライトウイング	799	44.0%
ライト・ウイング	37	2.0%
ライトウィング	981	54.0%
ライト・ウィング	0	0.0%

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>ライトウィング</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ライト・ウィング</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ライト・ウイング</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ ら行　　 │ 368.151 │ 54.2% │
│ ラ行　　 │ 291.641 │ 42.9% │
│ 良行　　 │  18.968 │  2.8% │
│ らぎょう │     937 │  0.1% │
│ ラぎょう │     111 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Reading field simplification

@@ -17,6 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>ら行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>良行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ラぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>ラ行</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

http://home.soka.ac.jp/~hkaneko/etxt/gohosinan.html

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>良行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<re_restr>良行</re_restr>

meikyo: 事を行おうとするその寸前。また、事が起ころうとするその寸前。

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 機先を制する</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜を制する</s_inf>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>verge of something beginning</gloss>
+<gloss>verge (of doing something)</gloss>

Looks good.
I don't think moments have edges.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>edge (of a moment)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 機先　　　　 │ 10.929 │ 60.5% │
│ 機先を制し　 │  4.695 │ 26.0% │
│ 機先を制する │  2.439 │ 13.5% │mostly used in this set expression
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
https://massif.la/ja/search?q=機先
Out of the first 100 sentences on massif 99 were for the expression, hence the note.
The single sentence was: だが、戦いの機先を奪われた。(However, they lost the edge in/of the battle)

Saito:
きせん〔機先〕
〈名〉Forestalling 

Prog, Lighthouse, Luminous, Chuujiten, Wisdom and GG5 have just the expression
That's maybe where that gloss came from


Sankoku: 事の始まろうとするとき
Meikyo: 事を行おうとするその寸前。また、事が起ころうとするその寸前
Gendaireikai: 物事がまさに起ころうとするその直前。やさき。

Doesn't need to go because of that. But it's annoying that none of the JEs apart from Saito tried to gloss this...
Maybe something like this?

@@ -16 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>forestall</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2060980">機先を制する</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. as 機先を制する</s_inf>
+<gloss>moment just before something happens</gloss>
+<gloss>verge of something beginning</gloss>
+<gloss>edge (of a moment)</gloss>
+<gloss>brink</gloss>

Daijisen

This gloss is wrong but I don't have a better one.

Agree

I don't think this needs an [anat] tag. GG5 doesn't have one. My medical terms dictionary doesn't have an entry for 臓器.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<field>&anat;</field>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&anat;</field>

Probably a mistake.

@@ -8 +7,0 @@
-<ke_pri>nf21</ke_pri>

This entry shows both nf11 and nf21 which looks like it could be a mistake. Automated systems trying to guess how common this word is may be confused by this.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 断固　 │ 378,276 │ 98.2% │
│ 断乎　 │   6,929 │  1.8% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ だんこ │   8,917 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Yes, "paddy field" is rather clunky.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=田んぼ
田んぼ
rice paddy〔【略】RP〕

田んぼに水を入れる
let water flow to a rice field
単語帳
田んぼのあぜ道
path between rice fields

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/田んぼ
rice field: 357
rice paddies: 187
rice paddy: 57
paddy field: 86
farm: 1

https://gemini.google.com/share/9a3869a91c84
Rice field	Global / North America	Simple, descriptive, and literal.
Paddy field	UK / Asia / Australia	The technically correct term for flooded rice cultivation.
Rice paddy	North America / Informal	Common in casual speech; emphasizes the flooded aspect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paddy_field
A paddy field (or paddy) is a flooded field of arable land used for growing semiaquatic crops, most notably rice and taro.

My Japanese teacher was talking about たんぼ and I did a quick lookup here mid-conversation.  I then proceeded to misuse the word because it doesn't mean "farm". Was corrected quite thoroughly: "only rice".  (she was talking about frogs croaking loudly in rice paddies at night).

As an American, I'd actually list "rice paddy" first for flavor, while finding "paddy field" totally unfamiliar.  "rice field", if gemini is to be believed, is safe worldwide, and is the most common reverso gloss.

@@ -41,0 +42,2 @@
+<gloss>rice field</gloss>
+<gloss>rice paddy</gloss>
@@ -43 +44,0 @@
-<gloss>farm</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 田んぼ │ 1.581.469 │ 84.5% │
│ 田圃　 │   151.497 │  8.1% │
│ 田ぼ　 │     1.135 │  0.1% │Not in my refs ; hiding
│ 田畝　 │       475 │  0.0% │[rK]
│ たんぼ │   126.852 │  6.8% │
│ でんぼ │     7.834 │  0.4% │
│ でんぽ │     1.311 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<keb>田ぼ</keb>
+<keb>田畝</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +18,2 @@
-<keb>田畝</keb>
+<keb>田ぼ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23 +24,0 @@
-<re_restr>田ぼ</re_restr>
@@ -36 +36,0 @@
-<re_restr>田ぼ</re_restr>

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<re_restr>田ぼ</re_restr>

Thanks. I think it was a cut/paste error.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1583380">百鬼夜行・1</xref>

Did you mean to put the xref on the first sense?
Also added it back to the new sense.

@@ -36,0 +37 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1583380">百鬼夜行・1</xref>

GG5, etc.
夜行	916493

The JEs only have the travel/train glosses. I think they should lead.
Raising the priority.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1583380">百鬼夜行・1</xref>
+<gloss>night travel</gloss>
@@ -24,8 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>night travel</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>やぎょう</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1583380">百鬼夜行・1</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>nightly procession of monsters, spirits, etc.</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +33,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>やぎょう</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>nightly procession of monsters, spirits, etc.</gloss>

Koj a.o. : 
①夜、行くこと。夜、出歩くこと。やこう。
② (→)百鬼夜行①のこと。

+ [vi] on first sense (sankoku)

Not sure if the new sense is an abbreviation

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +25,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>やぎょう</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1583380">百鬼夜行・1</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>nightly procession of monsters, spirits, etc.</gloss>

this is one case where it might make sense to put the abbr sense first.  also, is the spec2 needed?  does it add anything above news2?

GG5 and 中辞典 lead with it.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>renewal</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>renewal</gloss>

リニューアル	5747598	99.2%
リニュアル	47936	0.8%

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Bulk addition of vi and vt from Meikyo
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, eij

also means "renewal" (e.g., urban renewal)

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">renewal</lsource>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>renewal</gloss>

I think this is helpful given that the word doesn't appear as a gloss.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">renewal</lsource>

しな人	615

支那人	78576	71.1%
シナ人	31985	28.9%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>シナ人</keb>

Entry created

GG5:【解】 the parathyroid (glands); the accessory thyroid glands.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>parathyroid</gloss>
+<field>&anat;</field>
+<gloss>parathyroid (glands)</gloss>
+<gloss>accessory thyroid glands</gloss>

Entry created

Quiet

GG5

I think this is the more common sense. Changing order and aligning.

@@ -7,0 +8,9 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1155020">もって・5</xref>
+<gloss>in addition to that</gloss>
+<gloss>furthermore</gloss>
+<gloss>moreover</gloss>
+<gloss>as well as</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -10,3 +19 @@
-<s_inf>more emphatic than で</s_inf>
-<gloss>indicates means of action</gloss>
-<gloss>cause of effect</gloss>
+<s_inf>indicates means of action, more emphatic than で</s_inf>
@@ -14,5 +21 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<gloss>in addition to that</gloss>
-<gloss>furthermore</gloss>
+<gloss>with</gloss>

daijisen

@@ -13,0 +14,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<gloss>in addition to that</gloss>
+<gloss>furthermore</gloss>

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -9,3 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・2</xref>
@@ -13,1 +10,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2028980">で・3</xref>

Happy with your version. Poetic archaisms are not something I want to delve into much.

え is not an attested reading for this word, it's merely a pronunciation of へ. Neither of the kanji possess that reading either.
I only see a suffix entry for べ for 辺, not for 方. I think a note on the third sense is fine as it's generally a rendaku form that appears by suffixation.
On top of that most kokugo entries for へ don't have the suffix sense, it's a seperate entry (except for meikyo) if they even have it.
And I don't see the べ suffix entries for 方.

I also believe that the word in general is archaic. Shinsen, oukoku and meikyo tag it as such.
Most of the examples are from the MYS.

Smk and Sankoku have the first two senses as [poet] as well

.

Not sure about the note yet but I think it's better than the load of restrictions before.

@@ -13,6 +12,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>べ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>え</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -20,2 +13,0 @@
-<stagr>へ</stagr>
-<stagr>べ</stagr>
@@ -23,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>
@@ -24,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>vicinity</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +20,0 @@
-<stagr>へ</stagr>
-<stagr>べ</stagr>
@@ -30 +22,5 @@
-<gloss>shore (of the sea)</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&poet;</misc>
+<gloss>seashore</gloss>
+<gloss>seaside</gloss>
+<gloss>coast</gloss>
@@ -34 +30,2 @@
-<s_inf>esp. え,べ</s_inf>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. べ or pronounced as え</s_inf>

Entry created

Lost in the mists of time.

this?
https://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/networking/wais/HyperWais.README
https://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/networking/wais/

Entry created

Noted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HyperEdit
Tumult Whisk (originally Tumult HyperEdit) is an application for Apple's Mac OS X developed by Jonathan Deutsch.[4]

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_language

"Romani" is much more common now.

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>Romany (language)</gloss>
+<gloss>Romani (language)</gloss>

ロマニ語	148	44.6%
ロマーニ語	21	6.3%
ロマニー語	163	49.1% gg5, daijr
ロマーニー語	0	0.0%

@@ -4,0 +5,10 @@
+<keb>ロマニー語</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ロマニ語</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ロマーニ語</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8 +19,6 @@
-<reb>ロマーニーご</reb>
+<reb>ロマニーご</reb>
+<re_restr>ロマニー語</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ロマニご</reb>
+<re_restr>ロマニ語</re_restr>

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ あ行　　 │ 851.925 │ 72.0% │
│ ア行　　 │ 328.919 │ 27.8% │
│ 阿行　　 │     296 │  0.0% │[rK]
│ あぎょう │   1.759 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -16,6 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>あ行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>阿行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>ア行</re_restr>

sorry, i didn't know there was an "ateji" label

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ な行　　 │ 732.253 │ 73.3% │
│ ナ行　　 │ 265.165 │ 26.6% │
│ 奈行　　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ なぎょう │     840 │  0.1% │
│ ナぎょう │      59 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Reading field simplification

@@ -17,6 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>な行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>奈行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ナぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>ナ行</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Yes, overkill.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ わ行　　 │ 587.047 │ 68.6% │
│ ワ行　　 │ 247.832 │ 29.0% │
│ 和行　　 │  20.537 │  2.4% │
│ わぎょう │     448 │  0.1% │
│ ワぎょう │      28 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Reading field simplification.

Wouldn't mind having "wu" in there as well for the sake of completeness with a note saying it doesn't exist in known Japanese, but if I'm being honest that's probably a bit overkill.
Just a topic I've been looking at a lot a while back.

@@ -17,6 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>わ行</re_restr>
-<re_restr>和行</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ワぎょう</reb>
-<re_restr>ワ行</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

http://home.soka.ac.jp/~hkaneko/etxt/gohosinan.html

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>和行</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<re_restr>和行</re_restr>

@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1197870">雅楽・ががく</xref>
-<gloss>ceremonial Japanese court music</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1197870">雅楽</xref>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">ceremonial Japanese court music</gloss>

Aligning

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>old Japanese court music</gloss>
+<gloss>ceremonial Japanese court music</gloss>

GG5, etc. too.

Surprised we didn't have it. I feel sense 2 is an abbeviation, but the references don't say so.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1183720">音楽</xref>

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/楽-43522

NINJAL-LWP for BCCWJ lumped らく and がく, but nevertheless one can confirm expressions like 楽を奏でる and 楽を奏する.

Oops

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>むはっこうぱん</reb>
+<reb>むはっこうパン</reb>

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/種無しパン - 種無しパンまたは無発酵パン(Unleavened bread)
無発酵パン	702

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2864016">種無しパン</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>

https://cookpad.com/jp/search/無発酵パン
https://delishkitchen.tv/curations/5542
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/種無しパン

Thanks. I'd looked at it a couple of times, but not reached a conclusion.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 単発性　 │ 2.875 │ 82.5% │
│ 単発性の │   609 │ 17.5% │adj-f + adj-no? Since the example isn't adj-f
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

I believe it's the antonym to 多発性, which we have. Referring to a condition appearing only one part or one area (e.g. the source given by the submitter: 教皇、単発性の気管支痙攣, i.e "isolated/singular bronchospasm"). It appears to have a specific meaning in bone pathology as indicated by LSD and chatgpt's response, but I think it's better to just align it with 多発性.

LSD: monostotic


Chatgpt: 

The medical term 単発性 (たんぱつせい, tanpatsusei) generally means "single-occurrence" or "solitary." Its exact meaning depends on the context:

In general medical use, it refers to something that occurs only once or in isolation. This can include a single episode of a condition, such as a single seizure or a one-time occurrence of a disease, which might explain the "short-term condition" definition you've seen.

In bone pathology, particularly in reference to fibrous dysplasia, it translates to "monostotic" (i.e., affecting only one bone). In contrast, 多発性 (たはつせい, tahatsusei) would correspond to "polyostotic" (affecting multiple bones).

I don't think this means "short term condition".

An [ant] xref should be appropriate here, right? Mono and Poly are antonyms.
If approved 多発性 would also need the xref.

@@ -11,2 +11,7 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>short term (condition)</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1787870">多発性</xref>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>single</gloss>
+<gloss>solitary</gloss>
+<gloss>mono-</gloss>

https://www.vaticannews.va/ja/pope/news/2025-02/il-papa-gemelli-informazioni-sala-stampa-0228pm.html

Indeed.

I can't see this term being used in Japanese. The few hits are transliterations of the English.

https://www.hanaso.jp/blog/around/11034

https://x.com/ryunohane6_6/status/1288617614982356992

Very few web hits for ウェルノーンポート.

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>ウェルノーンポート</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -14 +11,2 @@
-<reb>ウェルノーン・ポート</reb>
+<reb>ウエルノウンポート</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17 +15 @@
-<reb>ウエルノウンポート</reb>
+<reb>ウェルノーンポート</reb>

ウェルノウンポート	462	88.5%
ウエルノウンポート	0	0.0% daijs
ウェルノーンポート	60	11.5%
ウエルノーンポート	0	0.0%
ウェルノウン・ポート	0	0.0%
ウエルノウン・ポート	0	0.0%
ウェルノーン・ポート	0	0.0%
ウエルノーン・ポート	0	0.0%

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>drying hair with a hair drier</gloss>
+<gloss>drying one's hair (with a hairdryer)</gloss>

We have two other ガー entries, so I suppose another isn't a problem.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12286050872
https://ameblo.jp/aki-1217-1217/entry-12283570843.html
https://ameblo.jp/coco-coco117/entry-11809376594.html?frm_id=blog-entry/app-download-upper

I don't think "hit" is needed.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>to hit</gloss>

I think it's OK.

I see it as an example in some of the JE's entries for ダメージ

GG5: ダメージを与える　do [cause] damage; hurt; damage
Wisdom: ダメージを与える cause [do] damage, to hit

Rather obvious expression (damage + [ACC] + cause/give). Does this make it?

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to hit</gloss>
+<gloss>to hurt</gloss>

ダメージを与え	283521

Abbreviation?

jawiki, brit
G n-grams: 445

中辞典 【経済】 〈重農主義〉 physiocracy.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&econ;</field>

gg5, koj, daij, nikk, smk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

daij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2864635">ロマ語</xref>

gg5, daijr, nikk

Daijisen: 国語の各音、また五十音図の各行の音に固有の意義を認めて語義を説き、語源解釈をしようとする説。平田篤胤 (ひらたあつたね) などにより、主に江戸時代に唱えられた。

All rather odd.

GG5: 音義説　the theory that each sound in Japanese has or is associated with a certain meaning.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 音義説 │ 202 │100.0% │GG5, Smk, Meikyo, Daij, Koj
╰─ーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/音義説

I've read 音義派 (the advocates for this theory) in the jawiki わ行 article, for whose understanding this word is needed.
音義派 is only in nikkoku and has 20 hits, so it probably doesn't make it. But I think this is useful to have.

.

I've encountered this concept a few times recently, after perusing this gem of a site which follows this approach. (http://kaitahito.world.coocan.jp/ongogen.html)

〈ひめ／ヒメ／姫〉〈さ／サ／早／小〉〈ゆり／ユリ／百合〉
ひめさゆり	15595	52.5%
ヒメサユリ	12688	42.7%
姫小百合	1037	3.5% nikk
姫さゆり	221	0.7%
姫早百合	71	0.2% gg5, koj, daij
姫サユリ	44	0.1%
ひめ小百合	37	0.1%
姫小ゆり	22	0.1%

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/オトメユリ
別名、ヒメサユリ（姫早百合・姫小百合）。

GG5 as well

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 副甲状腺機能低下症 │ 2.677 │100.0% │LSD, Daijs
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 副甲状腺機能亢進症 │ 7.226 │100.0% │GG5, LSD, Daijs
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

KOD: 	damage (caused) by birds; damage from birds; 《reduce》 bird damage.
ルミナス: damage from birds

Maybe this.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>wildbird-caused damage (e.g. to crops)</gloss>
-<gloss>wildbird-caused dirtying (e.g. to produce)</gloss>
+<gloss>damage by birds (e.g. to crops)</gloss>
+<gloss>dirtying by birds (e.g. to produce)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 鳥害 │ 18.110 │100.0% │Sankoku, Daijs, Daijr
╰─ーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Glosses may need improvement

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>wildbird repellent</gloss>
-<gloss>wildbird protection (device)</gloss>
+<gloss>wild bird repellent</gloss>
+<gloss>wild bird protection (device)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 鳥よけ │ 10.244 │ 58.3% │
│ 鳥除け │  3.738 │ 21.3% │
│ 鳥避け │  3.588 │ 20.4% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
https://www.ko-yu.co.jp/column/other-birdproofing-goods/
https://www.daim-corp.jp/products/category/category_2-25/

And google images

Also called 鳥害対策; I just proposed 鳥害

.

I've seen this word a few times now. No refs of mine seem to have it but it definitely exists.

砲廓	206	

A second, more explanatory gloss may be useful here

GG5:〔装甲艦の〕 a casemate

Just proposed 装甲艦

I see this only in gg5

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>armored enclosure for guns on a warship</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/装甲艦

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>armored (war)ship</gloss>
-<gloss>cuirassed ship</gloss>
+<gloss>armored warship</gloss>
+<gloss>armor-clad ship</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 装甲艦 │ 5.210 │100.0% │GG5, Nikk
╰─ーーー─┴───────┴───────╯
GG5: 装甲艦　an armored [a cuirassed] ship.