@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>fair</gloss>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<gloss>reasonable (e.g. judgment, policy, response, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>reasonable (judgment, policy, response, etc.)</gloss>

Yes, splitting senses is, er, reasonable.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>reasonable (only of a price, fee, fare, rate, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>reasonably priced (e.g. hotel, meal, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>reasonable (price, fee, fare, rate, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>reasonably priced</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>sensible</gloss>

*potentially* non-price collocations suggested by gemini:
リーズナブルな価格	401287	99.9%
リーズナブルな判断	58	0.0%  
リーズナブルな対応	64	0.0%
リーズナブルな説明	35	0.0%
リーズナブルな水準	139	0.0%
リーズナブルな要求	33	0.0%

Even among these, the meaning is frequently [1]
https://miraitech.co.jp/strength/
...柔軟でリーズナブルな対応が可能です。 "we can respond flexibly without driving up costs".
https://midori-bunen.com/?page_id=41
標準的でリーズナブルな対策です This is a standard and affordable solution./“cost-effective solution”

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/affordable
Able to be afforded; inexpensive or reasonably priced. 

reverso is not giving counts, so I expanded about 50 pages of results and counted:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/リーズナブル
reasonable 151
reasonably 66
reasonably priced 58
affordable 70
affordable prices 29
cheap 21
inexpensive 9
economical 7
low price 5
best price 3
value price 3
fair 7, almost all false-positives

One sense only:
https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/リーズナブル
価格が割安である様子。

https://hinative.com/questions/19857521
American people use reasonable for 1.having sound judgment and 2. not too expensive, but Japanese people cannot understand 1 meaning.
あなたの意見はリーズナブルだ ← Japanese people cannot understand.

Two posts complaining that リーズナブル shouldn't mean 安い.  Which indicates that it largely does:
https://x.com/makoto_B/status/1855402461286318299
https://x.com/hanya___ko/status/1676756992021639169
And a whole blog post opining on the subject:
https://note.com/good_sedum896/n/n98d796454480

Chatgpt translations of some collocations:
1. Applied directly to a "price" noun:
リーズナブルな価格 400870 — a reasonable price
リーズナブルな運賃 108677— a reasonable fare
リーズナブルな料金 106454 — a reasonable fee / reasonable rates
リーズナブルなプライス 11238— a reasonable price

2. Applied directly to a good or service:
リーズナブルなホテル 16609— a reasonably priced hotel
リーズナブルなお店 10495— a reasonably priced shop
リーズナブルな商品 10102— a reasonably priced product
リーズナブルな宿 7515 — a reasonably priced accommodation

False positives:
リーズナブルな男性	151
actual match:
リーズナブルな男性用カミソリ product
抗菌・防臭を施したリーズナブルな男性用白衣 product
...

リーズナブルな理由	206 False positives:
キャリートの料金がリーズナブルな理由 price
適正価格へのこだわり-天然素材なのにリーズナブルな理由  price
プロ講師でもリーズナブルな理由とは。 ... price

In 2018 [1] was simplified with the explanation "Usually refers to prices but doesn't have to."  Technically true, but...

リーズナブル is so strongly [1] that even collocations you might assume are [2] are actually still [1]. リーズナブルな対策 or リーズナブルな対応, for example, are often "Cost-effective measures", or "affordable service"(2 examples in refs). Even google translate will give "cost-effective" in some contexts.  Most people would not guess this. Breaking out [2] as [rare] gives some guidance.  

I showed the daijs definition (論理などが妥当なさま)[2] to one Japanese teacher and she was shocked to read it.  Another speaker remarked "probably Japanese people who know a lot of English might say this".  Not a sense commonly used in daily life.

[2] shows up in some articles fiscal policy(i.e. リーズナブルな水準 for the strength of the yen). Specialists throwing around English jargon. Still not that common.

"affordable" actually ties "reasonably priced" on reverso.  This matches the nuance reported to me. Wiktionary defines with 割安, "comparatively cheap", "economical" (i.e. affordable...).  Google translate alternates between "reasonably priced", "affordable", and a couple variations.

リーズナブル does not generally apply to people (NOT: "a reasonable man").

"fair" matches the English nuance, but not so much the Japanese one(安い).

@@ -14,2 +14,10 @@
-<gloss>reasonable (esp. of a price)</gloss>
-<gloss>fair</gloss>
+<gloss>reasonable (only of a price, fee, fare, rate, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>reasonably priced (e.g. hotel, meal, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>affordable</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>reasonable (e.g. judgment, policy, response, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>appropriate</gloss>
+<gloss>sound</gloss>

Meikyo, Sankoku, Shinsen, Iwakoku, GG5

101 hits in NINJAL and not one of them has the reading ほなか.
It's in daij, koj and nikk. They all cite the kojiki

Sense two is not archaic.

ほなか can get [rk].

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -27,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>throwing into the fire</gloss>
+<gloss>committing to the flames</gloss>

daij

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ほなか</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +23 @@
+<stagr>かちゅう</stagr>

daijs

I suspect the vs is only for the seemingly archaic second 
sense.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>burning (something)</gloss>
+</sense>

I reindexed the sentences.

OK, let's do it.

@@ -8,6 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>適う</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>敵う</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -19 +12,0 @@
-<stagk>叶う</stagk>
@@ -28,21 +20,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>適う</stagk>
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to suit (one's needs, tastes, purpose, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to serve</gloss>
-<gloss>to meet (one's expectations, wishes, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to measure up to (e.g. one's ideal)</gloss>
-<gloss>to conform to (the law, standards, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be consistent with (reason, morality, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<s_inf>esp. 敵う; with neg. verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>to match</gloss>
-<gloss>to be a match for</gloss>
-<gloss>to rival</gloss>
-<gloss>to equal</gloss>
-<gloss>to compare with</gloss>

FWIW Shinmeikai, Shinsen and GendaiRK also restrict each sense.

I feel it's probably better to make this 3 entries, as in the JEs.

GG5, etc.

Splitting. Also aligning the glosses more with the JEs.

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>適える</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -16 +12,0 @@
-<stagk>叶える</stagk>
@@ -19 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>to make come true (e.g. a dream, wish, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grant (request, wish)</gloss>
+<gloss>to answer (prayer)</gloss>
+<gloss>to make come true (e.g. a dream)</gloss>
@@ -21,11 +19 @@
-<gloss>to fulfill (e.g. a request, wish, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to grant</gloss>
-<gloss>to answer (a prayer)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>適える</stagk>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>to fulfill (conditions)</gloss>
-<gloss>to meet (requirements)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fulfill</gloss>

叶える	696838 way way more common and likely to get an IME hit
適える	3455

条件を叶え	192	52.6% rate of "mistakes" is significant
条件をかなえ	135	37.0% possibly [uk]?
条件を適え	38	10.4%

夢を叶えた	19187	49.4%
夢をかなえた	14784	38.0%
夢を適えた	46	0.1% rate of "mistakes" is trivial

Robin has a comment on 叶う that if we put a [restr] on all three senses there, we'd have to split the entries.

Maybe we should.  One upside of a split is that each kanji form gets an top-level "this kanji means this" headword, which in this case seems correct.

On this entry in particular, I was originally going to comment "[2] is so rare, I would not object to splitting it off and marking the whole entry rare".  Unlike 適う, 適える seems to have largely died off, and its presence here just adds noise.

Because the 3-way split on 叶う seemed like it wouldn't happen, I didn't make the suggestion.　But considering this entry in isolation, I think a split here makes sense.

Because 叶える is *so* much more common than 適える, an "esp. 適える" note on 2 isn't even technically correct.  There are more "mistakes" using 叶える than correct uses of 適える.

If we split, we could put 叶える[sK] on the 適える entry.  A corresponding entry would *not* be needed on 叶える.

Daijs, uncommon explicit kanji split:
https://kotobank.jp/word/適える-465027
１ （適える）ぴったり合うようにする。条件や基準などを、十分に満たす。「必要条件を―・える」
２ （叶える）思いどおりに実現させる。聞き届ける。成就させる。「希望を―・えてやる」

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/かなえる
【叶える】望みなどを実現させる。
【適える】基準や条件を満たす。

適える	3455	0.2%　<--- only this one died, now [rare]
適う	123949	6.5%
叶える	696838	36.7%
叶う	1073663	56.6%

gpt:
5. Why 適える specifically feels obsolete
適う survived as an intransitive evaluative verb
満たす took over the transitive, procedural role
So 適える was squeezed out from both sides.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=夢をかな
夢をかなえる
live out a dream
make one's dream happen
make one's dream reality
realize [actualize] a [one's] dream

夢 is 40% of all of the things that can be 叶えるed...
を叶える	579339
夢を叶える　248847
夢を適える	337	  

Things that can be realized or granted: (gpt)
願いを叶える	109783
願望を叶える	8772	0.0%
希望を叶える	17071	0.0%
望みを叶える	28473	0.1%
要望を叶える	2659	
祈りを叶える	168	0.0%
約束を叶える	234	1.4%
恋を叶える	12256	71.3% <- a tough translation
想いを叶える	3280	19.1%
気持ちを叶える	1428	8.3%
目的を叶える	958 a goal...


A weird one:
Romantic / emotional (high metaphor density)
恋を叶える
to make one’s love come true
to turn love into reality

想いを叶える
to have one’s feelings fulfilled
to see one’s feelings reciprocated (contextual, very natural)
English often resolves this relationally, not abstractly.

How you actually fulfill requirements in Japanese:
条件を満たし	304658	99.9%
条件を叶え	192	0.1% <-- includes inevitable mistakes
条件をかなえ	135	0.0%
条件を適え	38	0.0%
条件に適う	11614　(or this)

"esp." does not do this justice:
夢を叶える　248847
夢を適える	337

daijs and wiktionary give kanji-specific senses.  [restr] is better than "esp." here.  Prescriptively (and usu. in practice) you should not use either kanji outside of the correct sense.

Came here from the anime Erased/僕だけがいない街. 
Q: Why do you have バイト?
A: 自分で稼いだお金で叶えたい夢がある.  Because I have a dream I want to achieve using money I’ve earned myself.

This entry has always given me the impression 叶える was only for granting to others.  In the case of 夢, 叶える actually defaults to applying to ones own dreams. 

see also 叶う[1]: to come true (of a wish, prayer, etc.); to be realized; to be fulfilled​

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<stagk>叶える</stagk>
@@ -18,3 +19,5 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 叶える</s_inf>
-<gloss>to grant (request, wish)</gloss>
-<gloss>to answer (prayer)</gloss>
+<gloss>to make come true (e.g. a dream, wish, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to realize</gloss>
+<gloss>to fulfill (e.g. a request, wish, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grant</gloss>
+<gloss>to answer (a prayer)</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +26 @@
+<stagk>適える</stagk>
@@ -25 +29 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 適える</s_inf>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>適える</keb>
@@ -15,0 +18,1 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 叶える</s_inf>
@@ -18,0 +22,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<s_inf>esp. 適える</s_inf>
+<gloss>to fulfill (conditions)</gloss>
+<gloss>to meet (requirements)</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, etc.

Shouldn't be the first gloss.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>allegory</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>allegorical meaning</gloss>

寓意	26600	94.6%
寓意の	1506	5.4% - Don't think adj-no makes sense here

https://kotobank.jp/word/寓意-54810#w-482283
https://kotobank.jp/jeword/寓意#w-3193337

daijs, prog

Removing adj-no, adjusting glosses slightly

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>allegory</gloss>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>moral</gloss>
+<gloss>moral (of a story)</gloss>

〈作（り）／創（り）／造（り）／つくり〉〈出／だ〉す

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 作り出す　 │ 951,411 │ 63.5% │
│ 創り出す　 │ 213,549 │ 14.2% │ - drop [spec1]
│ つくり出す │  94,662 │  6.3% │ - sK
│ 創りだす　 │  57,994 │  3.9% │ - sK
│ 作りだす　 │  41,952 │  2.8% │ - sK
│ 造り出す　 │  31,707 │  2.1% │ - rK
│ 造りだす　 │  10,270 │  0.7% │ - sK
│ 創出す　　 │   1,693 │  0.1% │
│ 作出す　　 │     713 │  0.0% │
│ 作だす　　 │      75 │  0.0% │
│ つくりだす │  95,199 │  6.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>造り出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +19,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>作りだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,6 +27 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>作りだす</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>造り出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27,0 +31 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:
作り出す	951411
創り出す	213549
つくりだす	 95199
つくり出す	 94662
創りだす	 57994
作りだす	 41952
造り出す	 31707
造りだす	 10270

@@ -7,0 +8,5 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>創り出す</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +18,6 @@
+<keb>創りだす</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>作りだす</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -16 +27 @@
-<keb>創り出す</keb>
+<keb>造りだす</keb>
@@ -21,0 +33 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

GG5

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>getting on with people</gloss>

@@ -28 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>social disposition</gloss>
+<gloss>socializing</gloss>
+<gloss>personal relations</gloss>

〈人／ひと／ヒト〉〈付（き）／づき／ヅキ〉〈合（い）／あい／アイ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 人付き合い　 │ 188,358 │ 76.0% │
│ 人づきあい　 │  42,834 │ 17.3% │ - sK
│ 人づき合い　 │   9,854 │  4.0% │ - add
│ 人付合い　　 │   2,727 │  1.1% │ - add
│ ヒト付き合い │   1,360 │  0.5% │
│ 人付きあい　 │     647 │  0.3% │
│ ひと付き合い │     243 │  0.1% │
│ 人付き合　　 │     230 │  0.1% │
│ 人付合　　　 │     128 │  0.1% │
│ ヒトづき合い │      43 │  0.0% │
│ ひとづき合い │      35 │  0.0% │
│ ひとづきあい │   1,467 │  0.6% │
│ ヒトづきあい │      48 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>人づき合い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>人付合い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
人付き合い	188358	81.0%
人づきあい	42834	18.4%
ひとづきあい	1467	0.6%

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>人づきあい</keb>

OK

I agree with anon

I would say both those examples are not adjectival at all

製造の	583851
Eijiro:
製造の発展 : manufacturing development
製造の流れ : manufacturing stream

Not an adjective

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Sankoku, Shinmeikai

@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>large majority (of a group, faction, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>majority group</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog, Wisdom

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>general situation</gloss>
@@ -15 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>current thought</gloss>
+<gloss>general tendency</gloss>
+<gloss>way things are moving</gloss>
+<gloss>current (of the times)</gloss>
+<gloss>tide (e.g. of public opinion)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>the sun</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1408370">太陽</xref>
+<gloss>Sun</gloss>

Probably OK.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>to dilute to water down</gloss>
+<gloss>to dilute</gloss>
+<gloss>to water down</gloss>

Sankoku, GendaiShinkoku GG5, Prog, Meikyo

.

Note sure about the last gloss on sense one, I feel like it could go on either sense.

@@ -19,2 +19,12 @@
-<gloss>to dilute</gloss>
-<gloss>to water down</gloss>
+<gloss>to dilute to water down</gloss>
+<gloss>to thin</gloss>
+<gloss>to lighten (e.g. a color)</gloss>
+<gloss>to make less strong (e.g. flavor, depth, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to soften (e.g. a statement, impression, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to weaken (e.g. an effect)</gloss>
+<gloss>to tone down</gloss>
+<gloss>to temper</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/jeword/不縁#w-3219781
https://kotobank.jp/word/不縁-616358#w-616358

daijs, prog

不縁	845

Should really be two senses. Not a common word though

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>unrealized marriage (prospects)</gloss>
-<gloss>unrealised marriage</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>unrealized marriage prospects</gloss>

Not sure a separate adverbial sense is needed.

Sankoku

@@ -25,0 +26,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>very</gloss>
+<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+<gloss>terribly</gloss>
+<gloss>totally</gloss>

gg5, prog

I think this selection of glosses conveys the meaning more clearly.

@@ -17,0 +18,3 @@
+<gloss>fierce</gloss>
+<gloss>intense</gloss>
+<gloss>severe</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>strong</gloss>
@@ -20,5 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>raging</gloss>
-<gloss>stout</gloss>
-<gloss>intense</gloss>
-<gloss>spirited</gloss>
-<gloss>stormy</gloss>
+<gloss>terrific</gloss>
+<gloss>terrible</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 与太話　　 │ 69,909 │ 52.2% │
│ ヨタ話　　 │ 36,206 │ 27.0% │
│ よた話　　 │  8,764 │  6.5% │ add sK
│ よたばなし │  1,323 │  1.0% │
│ ヨタばなし │ 17,733 │ 13.2% │ add sk
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,2 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>与太話</re_restr>
-<re_restr>よた話</re_restr>
@@ -20 +19 @@
-<re_restr>ヨタ話</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

gg5, daijr
与太話	69909
ヨタ話	36206
よた話	8764

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>ヨタ話</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,6 @@
+<re_restr>与太話</re_restr>
+<re_restr>よた話</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨタばなし</reb>
+<re_restr>ヨタ話</re_restr>
@@ -15,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>foolish talk</gloss>
+<gloss>yarn</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 羽箒　　 │ 3,955 │ 68.6% │
│ 羽ぼうき │   687 │ 11.9% │
│ 羽帚　　 │    41 │  0.7% │Shinmeikai, Sankoku, Oukoku; add; [rK]
│ はぼうき │ 1,086 │ 18.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯
はねぼうき gets 8 hits in NINJAL corpora compared to 0 for はぼうき.
The one youglish example is はねぼうき.
Luminous has just はねぼうき.

.

It's not a large amount of evidence, but perhaps はねぼうき should come first.

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>羽帚</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12 +16 @@
-<reb>はぼうき</reb>
+<reb>はねぼうき</reb>
@@ -15 +19 @@
-<reb>はねぼうき</reb>
+<reb>はぼうき</reb>
@@ -19,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>feather brush</gloss>

Less than 20%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

羽箒	3955	85.2%
羽ぼうき	687	14.8%

N-gram

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for 映像研には手を出すな！.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>羽ぼうき</keb>

N-gram

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for 映像研には手を出すな！.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トーヘンボク</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

中辞典

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>dunce</gloss>

obunsha, daijrin, gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>bigot</gloss>

スーパー大辞林

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>blockhead</gloss>
+<gloss>stupid person</gloss>
+<gloss>insensitive person</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1532270">あけましておめでとうございます</xref>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1532270">明けましておめでとうございます</xref>

あけおめ	200381
明けおめ	4883
アケオメ	5103

Probably although they're relatively minor cases.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>明けおめ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アケオメ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -10,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

ことよろ	56856	96.8%
コトヨロ	1859	3.2%

aligning with あけおめことよろ

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of 今年もよろしくお願いいたします</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. of 今年もよろしくお願いします</s_inf>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>コトヨル</reb>
+<reb>コトヨロ</reb>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of 今年もよろしくお願いいたしま す</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. of 今年もよろしくお願いいたします</s_inf>

あけおめことよろ	26826	98.2%
アケオメコトヨロ	481	1.8%

敬語

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of あけましておめでとう、今年もよろしくお願いします</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. of あけましておめでとうございます、今年もよろしくお願いします</s_inf>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of あけましておめでとう、今年 もよろしくお願いします</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. of あけましておめでとう、今年もよろしくお願いします</s_inf>

ルミナス

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>asagiriso</gloss>

アサギリソウ	1637	59.1%
朝霧草	1135	40.9%

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アサギリソウ

wiki

Usual format

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<reb>アサギリソウ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -12 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>silvermound aretemisia</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>silvermound (Artemisia schmidtiana)</gloss>

Entry created

Possibly both.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<field>&telec;</field>

G n-grams:
無線ラン	38584

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無線ラン</keb>

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 聞く耳を持たない │ 20,080 │ 84.9% │
│ 聞く耳をもたない │  3,580 │ 15.1% │[sK]
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I've proposed entries for the base expression and the ～ず form

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

聞く耳を持たない	20080	52.8% this entry
聞く耳を持たぬ	585	1.5% another entry; insignificant
聞く耳を持たず	5356	14.1% significant
聞く耳を持て	854	2.2%
聞く耳を持った	630	1.7%
聞く耳を持って	10552	27.7% significant

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

https://kotobank.jp/word/汚し-489606#w-653891

daijs

food tag on the wrong sense I think

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<field>&food;</field>
@@ -27,0 +27 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Entry created

ゴミ屋敷	38154	72.1%
ごみ屋敷	13850	26.2%
ごみやしき	133	0.3%
ゴミやしき	91	0.2%
塵屋敷	700	1.3%

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>塵屋敷</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

doesn't have to be related to hoarding. i think this gets it across. i don't think its'a the type of culturr-specific word that needs an expl.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>ゴミやしき</reb>
-<re_restr>ゴミ屋敷</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>ごみ屋敷</re_restr>
@@ -20,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>trash house</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">house overflowing with garbage from hoarding</gloss>
+<gloss>garbage-filled house</gloss>

ngrams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ゴミ屋敷</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>ゴミやしき</reb>
+<re_restr>ゴミ屋敷</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>ごみ屋敷</re_restr>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ じとっと │ 4,061 │ 46.5% │
│ ジトッと │ 3,305 │ 37.9% │
│ ジトっと │ 1,359 │ 15.6% │ add
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジトっと</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>clammily</gloss>
+<gloss>stickily</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>dampiy</gloss>
+<gloss>damply</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>gloomy</gloss>
-<gloss>miserable</gloss>
+<gloss>gloomily</gloss>
+<gloss>miserably</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/超実数
https://math-jp.net/2021/07/20/超実数のイメージがわくように説明するよ/
https://ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp/~kono/lecture/basic-math/math08/lecture.html

gg5, RP, jawiki, 世界大百科

I'm dropping it.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 外国人の受け入れ │ 3,007 │ 56.4% │
│ 外国人の受入れ　 │ 1,265 │ 23.7% │
│ 外国人の受入　　 │ 1,062 │ 19.9% │
│ 外国人の受け入　 │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

.

Most results I saw when looking this up were ～の受け入れ.
I wouldn't necessarily call it obscure, but I don't quite think this is needed as an entry; it's a readily understandable collocation.

but the quote I posted could be translated as
"During a discussion on whether to regulate immigration levels, host Koji Kato asked, 'Why have the rules [for immigration] been so ambiguous?'"

I'd argue it's a better translation than "admittance of foreign nationals" here.

so it's not particularly obscure or odd I don't think?

However, since it's not in any EJ reference (that I can see) for "immigration", it's not of much use for reverse lookups, as it will lead the user to an obscure and uncommon term.

Since it's a non-obvious way to translate "immigration", I thought it might be useful. (esp. for reverse look-ups)

ウリスト教	300

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Korean Christian new religious movement</gloss>
+<gloss>Korean Christian religious movement</gloss>

https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/ウリスト教
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10164007160
https://christianjournal.hatenablog.com/entry/2016/02/27/101246
http://www1.cts.ne.jp/~clab/unchiku/letter-u-20.html#ウリスト教

GG5

https://kotobank.jp/jeword/熱核#w-3215236
https://kotobank.jp/word/熱核融合-595147#w-595147

daijs, prog

熱核融合	8270

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/ヘラる

jitsuyou

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ヘラる

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 急性呼吸窮迫症候群 │ 657 │ 60.4% │This; KOD, LSD, Nipponica, 医学英和辞典
│ 急性呼吸促迫症候群 │ 430 │ 39.6% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>ARDS</gloss>

https://www.msdmanuals.com/ja-jp/home/07-肺と気道の病気/呼吸不全と急性呼吸窮迫症候群/急性呼吸窮迫症候群-ards

https://www.msdmanuals.com/home/lung-and-airway-disorders/respiratory-failure-and-acute-respiratory-distress-syndrome/acute-respiratory-distress-syndrome-ards

KOD

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>SMBG</gloss>

https://mds.terumo.co.jp/diabetes/lifestyle/article01.html

https://salusclinic.jp/column/nutritional-counseling/817/

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
血糖自己測定	6951

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 急性呼吸窮迫症候群 │ 657 │ 60.4% │Pending
│ 急性呼吸促迫症候群 │ 430 │ 39.6% │This; Koj, KOD, LSD
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙（英和）, Oukoku, Kojien

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/躰道
https://kotobank.jp/word/躰道-686590#w-686590

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taidō

躰道	7731

daijs, wiki

実用日本語表現辞典; 学研 パーソナル和英辞典; 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiaca

It's Brazilian.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>indiaca (net sport played by hitting a shuttlecock with the hands)</gloss>
+<gloss>indiaca (volleyball-like game played with a large shuttlecock)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/いんでいあか-3207403#w-437695
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/インディアカ

インディアカ	22584

daijs, wiki

Never heard of this but seems somewhat popular in Japan. 

Also, it was invented in Germany but I don't think it's quite right to say the word itself came from the German language

局所時	163

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>local time</gloss>
+<field>&physics;</field>
+<gloss>local time (in relativity theory)</gloss>

https://nikkoku-tomonokai.japanknowledge.jp/detail.php?id=166690

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_clock
>> They are often called game clocks, as their use has since spread to tournament Scrabble, shogi, Go, and nearly every competitive two-player board game, as well as other types of games.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>game clock</gloss>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/対局時計; 大辞泉 第二版

I'll merge them.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/制造
https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/制造

This is the simplified Chinese spelling of 製造.