daijs, jawiki

"clustering" has more than one meaning in computing contexts.

@@ -9,0 +10,6 @@
+<gloss>clustering (of a group of computers)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1963330">クラスター分析</xref>
+<field>&stat;</field>
@@ -10,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>cluster analysis</gloss>

gg5: 5回コールしてだれも出なければ　if no one answers within five rings.

Oops. I assumed the "ring" gloss was just a synonym of "call". I should have read the edit history more carefully. "ring" was added in 2011, citing a similar example. GG5 also has it.
I didn't know コール could be used in that way. Arguably a separate sense.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>ring (of a telephone)</gloss>

「たまたま近くにいたため、１コール目で受話器を取ることができた。」

daijs

Added sense. 
I don't think "ring" is needed for sense 1.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>(telephone) ring</gloss>
@@ -36,0 +36,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1986600">コールオプション</xref>
+<field>&stockm;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>call (option)</gloss>

gg5, daijr/s

@@ -14,0 +15,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<s_inf>esp. セクタ</s_inf>
+<gloss>(disk) sector</gloss>
+</sense>

https://kotobank.jp/jeword/ポンチョ#w-3223233
https://kotobank.jp/word/ぽんちよ-3170798#w-632356

daijs, prog

adding language

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="spa"/>

gg5, daij

Two senses in all the kokugos.
"recall" isn't used with the sense 1 meaning in BrE.

@@ -12 +12,8 @@
-<gloss>recall (of a politician or a defective product)</gloss>
+<gloss>recall (of an elected official)</gloss>
+<gloss>removal of an elected official from office though a petition and popular vote</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>recall (of a defective product)</gloss>

中辞典 splits into two senses.

① 国または地方公共団体の公職にある者を、任期満了前に国民または住民の意思によって罷免する制度。日本では、最高裁判所裁判官の国民審査、地方公共団体の長・議員などの解職請求などがこれにあたる。直接民主制の一形態。国民罷免。国民解職。「市長をリコールする」
② 欠陥のある製品を生産者が回収し、無料で修理すること。

Clarified both scopes of the English "recall" have been carried over

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>recall</gloss>
+<gloss>recall (of a politician or a defective product)</gloss>

mk

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

A couple of my smaller kokugos refer to our second sense as the original (「もと、…」) meaning.
The others don't mention it. Not in the JEs either.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>active partipication</gloss>
+<gloss>active participation</gloss>

@@ -46 +46 @@
-<gloss>large houseboat (oft. used for tours and pasttime activites)</gloss>
+<gloss>large houseboat (oft. used for tours and pastime activities)</gloss>

OK, splitting.

@@ -12,8 +11,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たち</reb>
-<re_restr>館</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たて</reb>
-<re_restr>館</re_restr>

Sankoku for やかた:
①［館］貴族・豪族(ごうぞく)が住んだやしき。
②［館］昔、身分の高い人を尊敬して呼んだ言い方。
「お━（さま）」
③船・車につけた、屋根の形のおおい。
「━車(ぐるま)〔＝特に、牛車(ぎっしゃ)〕」
④←屋形船。

Meikyo for やかた:
❶［屋形・館］ 貴族・豪族などの屋敷。また、その主人。
❷［屋形］ 船の上に設けた屋根のある部屋。

Smk calls the first sense [poet].
Despite Sankoku restricting sense one to only 館, what I saw in the examples was more along the lines of Meikyo's restrictions.
Sticking with those.


BCCWJ:

｛館｝＝ 25494
｛館［ヤカタ］｝＝894

｛屋形｝＝ 153
｛屋形［ヤカタ］｝＝ 153


The majority of examples for sense two I spotted in the BCCWJ were as (お）館・屋形様.
The kokugos's examples align with that.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ お館様　　 │ 16,608 │ 42.5% │ 
│ 御館様　　 │  5,868 │ 15.0% │
│ 御屋形様　 │  5,092 │ 13.0% │
│ お屋形様　 │  4,655 │ 11.9% │
│ お館さま　 │  4,580 │ 11.7% │
│ お屋形さま │  1,278 │  3.3% │
│ 御屋形さま │    530 │  1.4% │
│ 御館さま　 │    434 │  1.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯


Nipponica for 屋形船:
川遊びなどに用いられた屋形（家の形をした覆い）を据え付けた船。楼船ろうせんともいう。古くは平安時代にさかのぼり、貴族の遊山ゆさん用の船、年貢輸送船、商船などに屋形をつけることが多かった。そのなかには舁据かきすえ屋形船とよばれる簡易な屋形もあり、平安以後も用途により絶えることなく続いた。しかし一般に屋形船といえば、江戸時代、花見、納涼、花火、月見の際に大名、豪商などが川面かわもに浮かべた豪華な遊覧船をさす。


Shinsen, daijs, iwakoku for sense 5

.

I think 館：たち・たて should be split out. 
It doesn't work smoothly with the restrictions.
On top of that the senses for やかた don't align all that well with those of たて and たち in the kokugos.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>
@@ -29,0 +31 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2745720">お館様</xref>
@@ -31,0 +34 @@
+<s_inf>usu. as (お)～様</s_inf>
@@ -33,0 +37,2 @@
+<gloss>lord</gloss>
+<gloss>master</gloss>
@@ -37 +42 @@
-<stagr>やかた</stagr>
+<stagk>屋形</stagk>
@@ -40 +45,15 @@
-<gloss>cabin (on a boat, carriage, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cabin (on a boat or carriage)</gloss>
+<gloss>large roofed area on a boat (resembling a house)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>屋形</stagk>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1815820">屋形船</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>large houseboat (oft. used for tours and pasttime activites)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>temporary residence</gloss>

Those readings are in GG5 and the kokugos. There's no indication that they're archaic.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to sense</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>to sense</gloss>
-<gloss>to become aware</gloss>
@@ -27 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to detect</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>to become aware of</gloss>

daijr, sankoku, etc.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ を悟って　 │ 30,578 │ 95.6% │
│ を覚って　 │    568 │  1.8% │ add rK
│ をさとって │    828 │  2.6% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -38,0 +40 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I don't think those new glosses should lead.

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>to perceive</gloss>
+<gloss>to sense</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to perceive</gloss>
-<gloss>to sense</gloss>

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>to become aware</gloss>
+<gloss>to notice</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>to detect</gloss>

Move xref.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2027650">オレオレ詐欺</xref>
@@ -27 +27,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2027650">オレオレ詐欺</xref>

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2027650">オレオレ詐欺</xref>
@@ -27,0 +29 @@
+<s_inf>as 行く行く詐欺, etc.; modeled from オレオレ詐欺</s_inf>

colloquial AmE
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/flake-out

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>flaking out</gloss>

Looks ok.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ クビを傾げる │ 569 │
│ クビを傾げて │ 477 │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クビを傾げる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

i don't think you can say "I put my head on the side" with this meaning

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to incline one's head to the side in doubt</gloss>
-<gloss>to put one's head on the side</gloss>
+<gloss>to incline one's head to the side (in doubt)</gloss>
+<gloss>to tilt one's head to the side (in confusion)</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>to put one's head on the side</gloss>
+<gloss>to be puzzled</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>autograph</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 跳ね回る　 │ 14,890 │ 80.4% │
│ 跳ねまわる │  1,203 │  6.5% │
│ はね回る　 │  1,126 │  6.1% │
│ 跳ね廻る　 │    145 │  0.8% │
│ はね廻る　 │     21 │  0.1% │
│ はねまわる │  1,125 │  6.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>跳ね廻る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

@@ -19,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>to jump around</gloss>
+<gloss>to bounce about</gloss>
+<gloss>to romp about</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>跳ねまわる</keb>

OK

https://massif.la/ja/search?q=半面
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/半面


Since it kind of got overshadowed before, I'm gonna put the BCCWJ data here once more:

"（４）BCCWJ (Counts in brackets are for 反面):
半面 has 250 counts in total (1069)

Sense one:
｛〘活用形＝連体形〙｝｛半面｝＝ 58 (456)
｛〘活用形＝連体形〙｝｛半面｝｛、｝＝ 45 (314)

Sense two:
｛、｝｛半面｝＝ 21 (117)
｛、｝｛半面｝｛、｝＝ 7 (68)
｛。｝｛半面｝＝  72 (100)
｛。｝｛半面｝｛、｝＝ 63 (62)
｛〘品詞＝連体詞〙｝｛半面｝＝ 42 (212)
Note that there may be a few missing for the counts with commas, as some of the sentences used , instead of 、.

That's 157 (45 + 7 + 63 + 42) out of 250 hits for conjunctive usage (I didn't use the counts for｛。｝｛半面｝and｛、｝｛半面｝on purpose, as they could technically include false hits for noun usage). That makes 62.8% of total usage.
Based on that I put the conjunctive senses first, as in the 反面 entry."

.

Both massif and reverso examples show that the conjunctive usage makes up the largest part of total usage.
In case it hasn't been noted yet, the BCCWJ data also supports this.


I get that it's currently only sankoku explicitly marking these senses, but I believe they're on the right track here.
Them also being treated as basically the same grammatical constructs in Brian's Waseda grammar textbook could technically serve as another reference here too.


I think if these two senses were to not lead, we also couldn't reasonably have these [rare] tags on the other senses. Since it's really a comparative rarity and not an absolute one.
And less stark than with 反面 at that.

I've been concerned about those proposed first two senses. After all, they're not in most references. I've come round to accepting them, although I'd be more comfortable if they didn't lead. I'll approve and leave open for a while.

No worries, I figured that something along those lines had happened.

＞So my [2] was the previous [2].  I only meant to say that the grammatical usage was far more common than all of these [rare] noun senses, and this term is not itself [rare]. Right now it looks like it is.

Thanks

＞So, yes, to be clear, my belief is that the grammatical senses of 反面 should be all be copy/pasted straight into this entry with xrefs (maybe just one way, from here to there).  They should probably be the leading senses.  

Good, that's what I had proposed as well. I didn't think the usage of conjunctive 半面 vs 反面 was marginal enough to be reduced to a hidden form and a note in 反面. I've put the two senses from my edit back and left Jims additions from the previous edit in place.

＞And who knows, we might even decide there is a subtle nuance meriting slight deviation in the glosses.  If not today, maybe tomorrow.

I actually had something like this in mind when I put "(but) at the same time" first in sense two. It's quite the minor change, but why not.


If this is approved, the incoming xref from 半顔 will need to be aligned.
And 半面 + the note would need to be removed from 反面.

@@ -15,0 +16,21 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481000">反面・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481000">反面・1</xref>
+<s_inf>after the attributive form of a verb or adjective, or the particle の</s_inf>
+<gloss>while</gloss>
+<gloss>although</gloss>
+<gloss>though</gloss>
+<gloss>but</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481000">反面・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481000">反面・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1006940">その半面</xref>
+<gloss>(but) at the same time</gloss>
+<gloss>on the other hand</gloss>
+<gloss>then again</gloss>
+<gloss>and yet</gloss>
+</sense>

Reverso

Something like "arrival deadline" might work as a noun gloss.

GendaiShinkoku, Sankoku, Shinsen, Smk

.

Noun glosses do indeed seem a lot worse

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +23,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>must wear (e.g. a seatbelt)</gloss>
+<gloss>must have on</gloss>

gg5, meikyo, reverso

"3月13日必着" means "must arrive by 13th March", not "must arrive on 13th March".
Thought about trying to convert the glosses into nouns but it's just too awkward.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>must arrive</gloss>
+<gloss>must arrive (no later than; e.g. of an application)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>must be delivered</gloss>

Seems OK. Perhaps [col] rather than [sl].

@@ -30,2 +30 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>to have mental health issues</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -33,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>to have mental health issues</gloss>

In common parlance, the 3rd meaning is arguably the most common when used in isolation (metaphorical "illness of the heart/mind" rather than literal sickness.) A Google search for 病んでる shows articles like this (the first article notes the modern usage of 病む):
https://sanyokai-clinic.com/kokoro/4139/
https://uruoi-clinic.jp/mental-column/mental-clinic/how-to-deal-with-mental-illness/

Entries already exist that are derived from sense 3: ヤンデレ (病んでる+デレデレ、mentally ill while also madly in love) and 病み垢 (social media account where someone dumps their negative feelings).

Both used to describe genuine mental health issues (often depression), but also in a hyperbolic way of "I'm feeling down."

@@ -25,0 +26,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>to have mental health issues</gloss>
+<gloss>to be depressed</gloss>
+<gloss>to feel down</gloss>

疚む
https://www.kanjipedia.jp/kotoba/0001388500
>> 病気になる。ながわずらいをする。「大病を―む」

No counts for 疚む (incl. inflected forms) in the google corpus.

Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───╮
│ 疚む │ 1 │
╰─ーー─┴───╯

Not sure 疚む is worth adding, but I'll leave this info here.

gg5 koj daijs

maybe clearer if we split into a [vi] and a [vt] sense
(koj splits this way)

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<gloss>to fall ill</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
@@ -20,3 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to fall ill</gloss>
-<gloss>to suffer from</gloss>
-<gloss>to have something wrong with</gloss>
+<gloss>to suffer from (e.g. a disease)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have something wrong with (e.g. an inner organ)</gloss>

OK. I'll adjust the sentence indices.

Meikyo and Sankoku agree

Endless examples of going to see a play
https://x.com/search?q="舞台を見に行"&src=typed_query&f=live


https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/舞台を観に行く
英語表現辞典での「舞台を観に行く」の英訳
舞台を観に行く
訳語 I'll go to see a play

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=舞台を
舞台をじっくり見る
follow the play closely

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=舞台+play
舞台と舞台の合間に演じる
perform ~ in the intervals between plays
単語帳
舞台をじっくり見る
follow the play closely
単語帳
舞台演劇を見に行く <--- 演出 is not needed 
go see a stage play

Daijs appears to have [1] as two different senses... I think it needs to be split.

Reading a book with a Japanese teacher, and she told me there's a theatrical version:  舞台もあります.  She used 舞台 this way like 10 times in the conversation. Confirmed with a second teacher, her sentence: 舞台を見に行く: to go see a play/show.  You can google this structure, and there are endless results.

舞台もあります actually translates as "There a theatrical adaptation as well", but we can't very well put "theatrical adaptation" here. 

By comparison, you do not "舞台化を見に行く" (bad).

I noticed on submitting that Robin mentioned the split in 2022.  So, I agree.

@@ -19 +19,8 @@
-<gloss>(stage) performance</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>stage performance</gloss>
+<gloss>stage production</gloss>
+<gloss>theatrical production</gloss>
+<gloss>play</gloss>
+<gloss>show</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Could be a separate sense.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>(stage) performance</gloss>

daijs:
㊂（大和）旧日本海軍の世界最大の戦艦。...

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/大和_(戦艦)

Almost all of the results on Google Images are about the ship.

@@ -27,0 +28,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>大和</stagk>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Yamato (battleship)</gloss>

>> It only applies to 大和, not to 倭 though. How would this be handled?
We currently cannot handle it.

大和 is 熟字訓
smk, kanjipedia a.o. : やまと【｛大和｝】

smk also says this :⇨付表。「和倭 ：｛日本｝」とも書く。
和倭	101

It only applies to 大和, not to 倭 though. How would this be handled?
Wouldn't this mean that every word containing 大和 needs to be updated now?

揚げ足取り　 80,259  86.0% 
あげ足取り　  2,931   3.1% -sK
あげ足とり　  2,339   2.5% -sK
挙げ足取り　  1,395   1.5% -rK (meikyo)
揚足取り　　  1,002   1.1% -sK
あげあしとり  5,437   5.8%

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>挙げ足取り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +17 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>挙げ足取り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +21 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Daijr, GG5, JWN, N-grams

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あげ足取り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あげ足とり</keb>
@@ -17,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +26,4 @@
+<gloss>carping</gloss>
+<gloss>quibbling</gloss>
+<gloss>cavilling</gloss>
+<gloss>caviling</gloss>

https://www.reddit.com/r/newsokuexp/comments/1p66mpu/小林源文74実際に日中戦争になったら先の大戦の沖縄硫黄島での戦闘のように日本人の恐ろしさを教えてあげ/

Seems to be used generally as well.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>war between Japan and China</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

I'd keep it, but not a big deal.

For タバコ, we decided just to drop the nokanji tag. I think we should do the same here.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 柳葉魚　 │   8,263 │  2.6% │
│ ししゃも │ 240,181 │ 77.0% │
│ シシャモ │  63,547 │ 20.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
ししゃも・シシャモ is 熟字訓 for 柳葉魚

Kanjipedia, Sankoku

.

Wouldn't we usually have it as 柳葉魚：シシャモ since it's a foreign word used with kanji as 熟字訓?
I mean, I can see that ししゃも is used a lot, and sankoku even gives it as a headword. So it does make sense to have it.
But most kokugos have it as 柳葉魚：シシャモ, as described.

What about having a [nokanji] tag on ししゃも instead? Just out of curiosity
This way we would dissociate ししゃも from the kanji form and have シシャモ be the reading.

It doesn't give an error but I doubt it has been done before, has it?

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

nikk: (アイヌsusam)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/シシャモ#名称
>> シシャモ」という名称は、アイヌ語のsusam（スサム、語源はsusu（スス（シュシュ））＝楊、ham（ハム）＝葉とされる）に由来する。

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ain">susuhamu</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="ain">susam</lsource>

gg5
クラスター分析	10,271	87.3%	
クラスタ分析	1,495	12.7%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クラスタ分析</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<field>&stat;</field>

Trimming.

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<gloss>phone scam where the scammer pretends to be a relative (typically son)</gloss>
+<gloss>phone scam involving a pretended relative</gloss>

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<gloss>phone scam involving calls from pretended relatives in distress</gloss>
+<gloss>phone scam where the scammer pretends to be a relative (typically son)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ オレオレ詐欺 │ 76,964 │ 77.8% │
│ おれおれ詐欺 │ 18,692 │ 18.9% │ - sK
│ 俺俺詐欺　　 │  2,746 │  2.8% │ - ... (smk, iwakoku)
│ 俺々詐欺　　 │    266 │  0.3% │ - add, sK
│ 俺おれ詐欺　 │    159 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ おれ俺詐欺　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ おれおれさぎ │    143 │  0.1% │
│ オレオレさぎ │     31 │  0.0% │ - drop
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<keb>おれおれ詐欺</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +11,8 @@
+<keb>おれおれ詐欺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俺々詐欺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,4 +26,0 @@
-<reb>オレオレさぎ</reb>
-<re_restr>オレオレ詐欺</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -25,4 +27,0 @@
-<re_restr>おれおれ詐欺</re_restr>
-<re_restr>俺俺詐欺</re_restr>
-<re_restr>俺おれ詐欺</re_restr>
-<re_restr>おれ俺詐欺</re_restr>

While the term means sons it's used more widely.

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>phone scam in which the perpetrator typically pretends to be the son of the fraud victim</gloss>
+<gloss>phone scam involving calls from pretended relatives in distress</gloss>

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss>type of fraud involving phone calls pretending distress</gloss>
+<gloss>phone scam in which the perpetrator typically pretends to be the son of the fraud victim</gloss>

daij, koj

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>to worry</gloss>
-<gloss>to suffer</gloss>
+<gloss>to worry (about)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be terribly worried (about)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be very concerned (about)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be sick with worry</gloss>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>

Entry created

Reverso

I'm inclined to keep it. 破損 doesn't usually mean "lost". Obviously not common.

破損クラスタ	467		
破損クラスター	0

Few web hits.

Entry created

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/不良セクタ
不良セクタ	16,553	87.1%	
不良セクター	2,458	12.9%

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>不良セクタ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8 +12 @@
-<reb>ふりょうセクター</reb>
+<reb>ふりょうセクタ</reb>

Entry created

I think it's OK as it is.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ お館様　　 │ 16,608 │ 42.5% │ 
│ 御館様　　 │  5,868 │ 15.0% │
│ 御屋形様　 │  5,092 │ 13.0% │
│ お屋形様　 │  4,655 │ 11.9% │
│ お館さま　 │  4,580 │ 11.7% │add; [sK]
│ お屋形さま │  1,278 │  3.3% │add; [sK]
│ 御屋形さま │    530 │  1.4% │add; [sK]
│ 御館さま　 │    434 │  1.1% │add; [sK]
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Aligning.
Displaying only one of each form.

Perhaps there are two senses here? 
Pixiv: 室町時代から戦国時代にかけて呼ばれていた、守護大名の家臣が主君を呼ぶ際の尊称。

Not sure if having this all in one sense works too well

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>お屋形様</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +19,14 @@
-<keb>お屋形様</keb>
+<keb>お館さま</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お屋形さま</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御屋形さま</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御館さま</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,0 +41,2 @@
+<gloss>nobleman</gloss>
+<gloss>noblewoman</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +45 @@
+<gloss>dignitary</gloss>

ngrams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お館様</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お屋形様</keb>

Fixed xref.

I still think the unambiguous gloss should lead. It's a perfectly fine gloss.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1499150">舞台・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1499150">舞台・2</xref>

Seems rather repetitive.

@@ -14,2 +14,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1499150">舞台・2</xref>
-<gloss>adapting for the stage</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1499150">舞台・3</xref>
+<gloss>theatrical adaptation</gloss>
+<gloss>stage adaptation</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>stage adaptation (i.e. the process of adapting)</gloss>
-<gloss>theatrical adaptation</gloss>

舞台化	52973	  
舞台化さ	10497	  
舞台化し	8002	 

舞台化: the process
"千と千尋の神隠しの舞台化"
https://www.sankei.com/article/20211126-XSU2ZKSKXRJH7NVGHUKY5UBMNA/
鈴木は、「千と千尋の神隠し」の舞台化について、こんなエピソードも披露した。ケアードから直接、舞台化の打診を受けた際、宮崎監督が周囲の予想に反して「いいよ」と快諾。「あんなに多くの人に支持されたのだから、もう俺のものじゃない。皆さんのものだ」といった感じだったという。
google: Suzuki also shared this story about the stage adaptation of "Spirited Away." When Caird directly approached him about adapting it for the stage, Miyazaki readily agreed, contrary to everyone's expectations. He seemed to respond, "Since so many people have supported it, it's no longer mine. It belongs to you all."

舞台: the result
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/1106239ccfb634b3933aec93f3defc5cf53013b3
橋本さんは、この発表に「この度『千と千尋の神隠し』の舞台を中国の皆様にお届けできる事、とても光栄に思います。
Regarding this announcement, Hashimoto said, "I am extremely honored to be able to bring the stage production of 'Spirited Away' to everyone in China.

https://gemini.google.com/share/2e32812866a9
2. The Comparison: Butai vs. Butaika
If you want to say "I like the stage adaptation" in the sense of the product (the show itself), you would usually drop the "ka".
〇〇の舞台が好き (XX no Butai ga suki):
Translation: "I like the XX stage play."

Focus: The show as a piece of entertainment. You enjoyed watching it.
〇〇の舞台化が好き (XX no Butaika ga suki):
Translation: "I like the [way they handled the] staging of XX" OR "I prefer the stage version (over the movie/anime version)."
Focus: The transformation process or the format itself.

The xref is to a new sense, that might need fixing.

As a verb, 舞台化された "was adapted for the stage". (ngrams)

I worked on this for hours before realizing that I am reverting Robin's very recent edit. 

I think "stage/theatrical adaptation"(noun) is problematic in English because, without context, it will usually be interpreted as "the end product".  "I loved the theatrical adaptation of Beauty and the Beast".  This is not that.  This is probably why the glosses were as they were.  I do think "stage adaptation" belongs here, but I think it needs a big warning sign.

It could work for something like "stage adaptation takes a lot of resources to do well". Or, as in the example below "there are updates in the (in-progress) stage adaptation of XYZ". 

Or something like "舞台化決定". "this work is going to be adapted for the stage" / "Theatrical adaptation announced/confirmed". 

I have some AI notes, but this is based on human conversations about 舞台 and 舞台化 (see xref).  Once a book is mentioned, 舞台もあります means "there's also a theatrical adaptation/version". 舞台化 would not be used this way.

舞台がある	15860	82.6%
舞台もある	3333	17.4%
舞台化がある	0	0.0%
舞台化もある	0	0.0%

If you want to do a lot of reading, these both return innumerable results, the nuance is different:
"千と千尋の神隠しの舞台" (most conversations about the stage performance itself, "the stage adaptation", "the theatrical production", "the end product"
"千と千尋の神隠しの舞台化" how it came about, how is it progressing, when will it be done, what was involved....

Random google hit, page 5:
https://www.huffingtonpost.jp/entry/story_jp_60383864c5b6371109daf58b
「千と千尋の神隠し」の舞台化に驚きの声。千尋役は橋本環奈さん、上白石萌音さん。ハク役は誰に...？
google: There are voices of surprise at the stage adaptation of "Spirited Away." Chihiro will be played by Kanna Hashimoto and Mone Kamishiraishi. Who will play Haku...?

The production is *in progress*, and that's what's being talked about. It's subtle.

@@ -14 +14,6 @@
-<gloss>stage adaptation</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1499150">舞台・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1499150">舞台・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1499150">舞台・2</xref>
+<gloss>adapting for the stage</gloss>
+<gloss>adapting for the theatre (theater)</gloss>
+<gloss>stage adaptation (i.e. the process of adapting)</gloss>

Oops. Nice catch.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

gg5, chujiten

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あかしを立てる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -22 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>to make clear</gloss>
+<gloss>to establish</gloss>
+<gloss>to give evidence (for)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 証を立てる　　 │ 1,663 │ 66.7% │
│ 証をたてる　　 │   299 │ 12.0% │
│ 証しを立てる　 │   243 │  9.7% │
│ あかしを立てる │   181 │  7.3% │
│ 証しをたてる　 │    61 │  2.4% │
│ あかしをたてる │    48 │  1.9% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>証をたてる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

We don't use usage notes for meaning.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<s_inf>esp. for lifting assistance in logistics, nursing, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<gloss>(powered) exoskeleton</gloss>
+<gloss>(powered) exoskeleton (esp. for lifting assistance in logistics, nursing, etc.)</gloss>

I guess so.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パワー・アシスト・スーツ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2837031">パワードスーツ</xref>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoskeleton_(human)
An exoskeleton is a wearable device that augments, enables, assists, or enhances motion, posture, or physical activity through mechanical interaction with and force applied to the user's body.[2]
Other common names for a wearable exoskeleton include exo, exo technology, assistive exoskeleton, and human augmentation exoskeleton.

https://www.theexoskeletonstore.com/collections/exoskeletons-for-back-support?srsltid=AfmBOoqNWvW8OkPTzXNRKRXtaWFi1gqly7tdi09YO9Y6GBgE0N8oG_rl

Even these light logistics suits are called exoskeletons (w/pic): 
https://www.germanbionic.com/
The World’s Most Powerful Exoskeleton
The AI exoskeleton for the toughest tasks in industry and compassionate patient care.


https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/パワードスーツ

パワーアシストスーツ	737	1.7%
アシストスーツ	69	0.2%


強化服	6260	14.5%
強化スーツ	2492	5.8%
ロボットスーツ	11723	27.2%
強化外骨格	3211	7.4%
外骨格	15515	36.0%
マッスルスーツ	3094	7.2%
サポートジャケット	0	0.0%

I think this is waseigo.  We just love "exoskeleton" too much to call it anything bland like "power/lift assist suit". Certainly Japanese products *are* translated this way, so if you want to make it a gloss you could.  But I don't think it's common English. 

Introduced by Japanese speaker when I explained what an "exoskeleton" was in a generic context (not for logistics, just "robot skeleton outside of body"). She was quite fixed on this term.

She reports 外骨格 could be used in SciFi contexts, but not in, say disability assistance or a workplace environment. 

Wikipedia gives a list of variants of varieties of exoskeleton: 強化服 強化スーツ ロボットスーツ 強化外骨格 外骨格
But specifically in nursing and cargo/logistics, this term:
医療・介護分野や物流・荷役など重量物を扱う作業で使われているものは、パワーアシストスーツあるいはアシストスーツ[3]と呼称されることもある。

Image search is largely carrying boxes.
Here's a boring logistics example(with pick of small woman lifting heavy object in workplace environment):
https://wakayamashimpo.co.jp/2025/07/20250712_132589.html

With tech development, パワーアシストスーツ is probably becoming more common than the ngrams suggest, and アシストスーツ is following along as the simplification.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergent_virus
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/emergent-virus

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>emergent virus</gloss>

GG5, 医学英和辞典

https://kotobank.jp/word/えまーじんぐういるす-3145410

エマージングウイルス	1510	88.1%
エマージング・ウイルス	116	6.8%
エマージングウィルス	87	5.1%
エマージング・ウィルス	0	0.0%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_grouper

アオハタ	4815	100.0%
青羽太	0	0.0%

https://kotobank.jp/word/青羽太-1764988#w-1862202
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アオハタ

nikk, wiki

Should probably make it clear.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>unripe lemon</gloss>

グリーンレモン	1948
daijs

could be specific and say sth like "lemon harvestes unripe" because it doesn't seem like "green lemon" is necessarily a known concept in 英語圏 as it appears to be in Japan

GG5

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>joint puncture</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthrocentesis

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/arthrocentesis

https://www.proceduresconsult.jp/jp/ホーム/手技一覧/手技詳細/c/1167

Not sure it's needed.

Bigger than it looks.  See google, twitter
舞台化作品	228

An appropriate term for "the final product of an adaptation", if needed. (usually not). usually you just use 舞台 and context.

See comments at 舞台化, 舞台.  As with my ice-fishing glosses, the reason this is important to carry is precisely because we have "stage adaptation" on another entries that don't have this unambiguous sense.

36+ pages of google results, 5 pages of books, "舞台化作品" site:mainichi.jp 10 hits, for example:
協会はミュージカル以外も含め、舞台化作品の総称として
人気コミックの初の舞台化作品
コミックの舞台化作品
本シリーズ（通称『まほステ』）はその舞台化作品で
...

Plenty of examples, often with images, exactly what you would expect:
https://x.com/search?q="舞台化作品"&src=typed_query&f=live

Dropping it.

0 ngrams. Not in references.

Rare AB compound. I don't think it makes it.

https://www.soundmart.co.jp/item/detail/2411000001146/?srsltid=AfmBOooOy3SNJKr0CM2OBgX93buOmMLGviYgyw7FWmsE04Nj3yoxFohI

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heracleum_(plant)
ハナウド属	60
ハナウド	1650
花独活	167
はなうど	119

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Heracleum</gloss>
+<gloss>Heracleum (species)</gloss>
+<gloss>hogweed</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ハナウド属

daijs, jawiki

daijs
クラスター弾	3,392	
クラスター爆弾	47,418

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/Editorial_policy.html#Date_and_Time_Formats "For classifying years in dates, use the secular BCE (Before Common Era) and CE (Common Era). In dates after 1,000 CE the "CE" is usually omitted."

A database search shows most gloss edits in the past couple years have used BCE, but we've been inconsistent about it.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Li Ling (?-74 BC; Chinese general)</gloss>
+<gloss>Li Ling (?-74 BCE; Chinese general)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Ling

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Riryō</gloss>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Li Ling (?-74 BC; Chinese general)</gloss>

ryou fixup
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Riryou</gloss>
+<gloss>Riryō</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aonishiki_Arata

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realme