daijs: 多く複合語の形で用い、帝国の、皇帝の、また、威厳のある、最上級の、などの意を表す。「―ルーム」

The 〜の n-gram terms don't look adjectival.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

The n-grams show a lot of hits with が, を, etc. appended, which puzzled me until I realized it is also a whisky brand.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

カレッジペーパー	0

Not in my refs.

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カレッジ・ペーパー</reb>

Yes to the split, but 中辞典 has レリーフ for this meaning, xreffed to リリーフ. I suggest keeping it here too but hidden.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<stagr>リリーフ</stagr>
@@ -19,6 +17,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1588030">浮き彫り・1</xref>
-<s_inf>usu. レリーフ</s_inf>
-<gloss>relief (sculptural method)</gloss>

gg5, meikyo
レリーフが施され	2,699		
リリーフが施され	0
---		
レリーフ模様	1,406		
リリーフ模様	0	
---	
レリーフ紋様	1,262		
リリーフ紋様	0
---		
レリーフ入り	1,233		
リリーフ入り	0

I think we should split out レリーフ into a separate entry.

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>relief (e.g. pitcher)</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
+<gloss>relief</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +22 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1588030">浮き彫り・1</xref>
@@ -21 +24 @@
-<gloss>relief (e.g. bas relief)</gloss>
+<gloss>relief (sculptural method)</gloss>

"i.e." is for limitation - here, "e.g." is correct

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>relief (i.e. pitcher)</gloss>
+<gloss>relief (e.g. pitcher)</gloss>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>relief (i.e. bas relief)</gloss>
+<gloss>relief (e.g. bas relief)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/芽胞
>> 以前は、（細菌の）胞子（ほうし、spore）、内生胞子（ないせいほうし、endospore）とも呼ばれていたが、真菌やシダ植物の胞子とは役割が異なるため、それらと区別するために、芽胞という名称で呼ばれるようになった。

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1517730">胞子</xref>
+<field>&biol;</field>
@@ -14,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<gloss>endospore</gloss>
+</sense>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/学部#英語表記

I don't think "department" should lead. A department is below a faculty/school/college but a 学部 is a top-level unit. Most Japanese universities use "faculty" for 学部 and "department" for 学科.

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>department (of a university)</gloss>
-<gloss>faculty</gloss>
+<gloss>faculty (of a university)</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>department</gloss>

Forgot to add this.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>college</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous

Although 学部(学)生 is "undergraduate student", I don't think it's correct to say 学部 = undergraduate. It doesn't have this meaning in most 学部- compounds.

@@ -18,6 +18,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>department of a university</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>undergraduate (course, program, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>department (of a university)</gloss>
+<gloss>faculty</gloss>
+<gloss>school</gloss>

None of the kokugos have a musical saw sense. I don't think it's needed.
The EJs have ミュージカルソー for "musical saw".

@@ -24,5 +23,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>musical saw</gloss>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

G n-grams:
鋸	153830
のこぎり	164232
ノコギリ	123454

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノコギリ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

gg5, luminous, reverso

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>research thesis</gloss>
-<gloss>treatise</gloss>
+<gloss>research paper</gloss>
+<gloss>study</gloss>
+<gloss>thesis</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>one's attitude</gloss>
+<gloss>one's attitude (toward)</gloss>
+<gloss>one's position</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>developments</gloss>

GG5, meikyo, shinmeikai

The JJ dictionaries seem to consider these separate senses (usually defined as something like 1. 従うことと、そむくこと vs 2. 成り行き、動静), and they seem to me like distinct ideas in English too.

"support or opposition" follows 従うことと、そむくこと and GG5, and I think helps to make clear what kind of attitude this is about. "whether one supports or opposes something" might be clearer, but the more terse phrasing is probably more in line with jmdict house style.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<gloss>support or opposition</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>situation</gloss>

The smaller kokugos don't have it.

｛合体［ゴウタイ］｝gets 0 hits in all NINJAL corpora, even the historical ones.
All hits are for ｛合体［ガッタイ］｝(I also checked for がってい, which is in nikkoku).

ごうたい is only in daijs and koj with an xref to がったい

.

I was reading through an old github issue where it was mentioned that ごうたい should probably get [rk].
Picking up on that

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>

@@ -40 +40 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&euph;</misc>

@@ -41 +41 @@
-<gloss>sexual intercorse</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual intercourse</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1286930">国内</xref>

JEs

the translation "overseas" seems to be specific to Japan

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>abroad</gloss>

daijr/s

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2246570">陽明学</xref>
-<gloss>neo-Confucianism (based on the teachings of Zhu Xi and his followers)</gloss>
+<gloss>neo-Confucianism (based on the teachings of Zhu Xi)</gloss>
+<gloss>Cheng-Zhu school</gloss>

The mind boggles.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/god_tier

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>god-tier</gloss>

Plenty of 〜な examples on Twitter for sense 2. I don't think it's ever used as a noun.

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -37 +37 @@
-<gloss g_type="fig">emperor of Japan</gloss>
+<gloss>Emperor (of Japan)</gloss>

Sorry. I overlooked that. I'll split them off. (2836999)

@@ -15,8 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かむ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かん</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

I don't think a 短期大学 would ever be called a "community college", despite the similarities. コミュニティカレッジ is used for community colleges in the US.

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>community college</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">vocationally oriented two or three year post-secondary education institution</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">vocationally oriented post-secondary institution offering two or three-year programs</gloss>

The term varies in meaning - probably OK given the [expl] gloss.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today 5-y&q=community college,junior college&hl=en-US

"Community college" is the more popular term for a short-term college.

However, "junior college" seems to be the more common translation; my dad’s friend, who works as an English teacher at a 短期大学, didn’t know what a community college was.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>community college</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">vocationally oriented two or three year post-secondary education institution</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">vocationally oriented post-secondary institution offering two or three-year programs</gloss>

daijs

the x-ref got lost for some reason

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1418650">短期大学</xref>

Matching proposed addition to 短期大学.

@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">vocationally oriented two or three year post-secondary education institution</gloss>

For reverse lookups.
I don't think we need "isohypse". It's a rather obscure word.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>contour (line)</gloss>
-<gloss>isohypse</gloss>
+<gloss>contour line</gloss>
+<gloss>contour</gloss>

... added the Greek version of the meaning...

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>isohypse</gloss>

gg5, prog, wisdom, RP

The JEs have "topographic map" for 地形図.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>topographic map</gloss>
+<gloss>contour map</gloss>

OK

https://massif.la/ja/search?q=半面
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/半面


Since it kind of got overshadowed before, I'm gonna put the BCCWJ data here once more:

"（４）BCCWJ (Counts in brackets are for 反面):
半面 has 250 counts in total (1069)

Sense one:
｛〘活用形＝連体形〙｝｛半面｝＝ 58 (456)
｛〘活用形＝連体形〙｝｛半面｝｛、｝＝ 45 (314)

Sense two:
｛、｝｛半面｝＝ 21 (117)
｛、｝｛半面｝｛、｝＝ 7 (68)
｛。｝｛半面｝＝  72 (100)
｛。｝｛半面｝｛、｝＝ 63 (62)
｛〘品詞＝連体詞〙｝｛半面｝＝ 42 (212)
Note that there may be a few missing for the counts with commas, as some of the sentences used , instead of 、.

That's 157 (45 + 7 + 63 + 42) out of 250 hits for conjunctive usage (I didn't use the counts for｛。｝｛半面｝and｛、｝｛半面｝on purpose, as they could technically include false hits for noun usage). That makes 62.8% of total usage.
Based on that I put the conjunctive senses first, as in the 反面 entry."

.

Both massif and reverso examples show that the conjunctive usage makes up the largest part of total usage.
In case it hasn't been noted yet, the BCCWJ data also supports this.


I get that it's currently only sankoku explicitly marking these senses, but I believe they're on the right track here.
Them also being treated as basically the same grammatical constructs in Brian's Waseda grammar textbook could technically serve as another reference here too.


I think if these two senses were to not lead, we also couldn't reasonably have these [rare] tags on the other senses. Since it's really a comparative rarity and not an absolute one.
And less stark than with 反面 at that.

I've been concerned about those proposed first two senses. After all, they're not in most references. I've come round to accepting them, although I'd be more comfortable if they didn't lead. I'll approve and leave open for a while.

No worries, I figured that something along those lines had happened.

＞So my [2] was the previous [2].  I only meant to say that the grammatical usage was far more common than all of these [rare] noun senses, and this term is not itself [rare]. Right now it looks like it is.

Thanks

＞So, yes, to be clear, my belief is that the grammatical senses of 反面 should be all be copy/pasted straight into this entry with xrefs (maybe just one way, from here to there).  They should probably be the leading senses.  

Good, that's what I had proposed as well. I didn't think the usage of conjunctive 半面 vs 反面 was marginal enough to be reduced to a hidden form and a note in 反面. I've put the two senses from my edit back and left Jims additions from the previous edit in place.

＞And who knows, we might even decide there is a subtle nuance meriting slight deviation in the glosses.  If not today, maybe tomorrow.

I actually had something like this in mind when I put "(but) at the same time" first in sense two. It's quite the minor change, but why not.


If this is approved, the incoming xref from 半顔 will need to be aligned.
And 半面 + the note would need to be removed from 反面.

@@ -15,0 +16,21 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481000">反面・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481000">反面・1</xref>
+<s_inf>after the attributive form of a verb or adjective, or the particle の</s_inf>
+<gloss>while</gloss>
+<gloss>although</gloss>
+<gloss>though</gloss>
+<gloss>but</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481000">反面・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1481000">反面・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1006940">その半面</xref>
+<gloss>(but) at the same time</gloss>
+<gloss>on the other hand</gloss>
+<gloss>then again</gloss>
+<gloss>and yet</gloss>
+</sense>

Withdrawing my suggestion.

@@ -7,4 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>半面</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28 +23,0 @@
-<s_inf>occ. 半面</s_inf>

Reopen..

Adding my suggestion about 半面. I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>半面</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +28 @@
+<s_inf>occ. 半面</s_inf>

（１）Sankoku:
一｟名｠
①反対の（方）面。
「やさしさの━にたくましさを秘(ひ)めている」
②〔接続助詞的に用いて〕…のと同時に、別の面では。
「期待する━（で）、不安もある」
二｟接｠
別の面では。反対の面からみると。
「結果には満足している。━、反省もある」



（２）BCCWJ:
反面 has 1069 counts in total

For case 3:
｛〘活用形＝連体形〙｝｛反面｝＝ 456
｛〘活用形＝連体形〙｝｛反面｝｛、｝＝ 314

For case 2:
｛、｝｛反面｝＝ 117
｛、｝｛反面｝｛、｝＝ 68
｛。｝｛反面｝＝ 100
｛。｝｛反面｝｛、｝＝ 62
Note that there may be a few missing for the counts with commas, as some of the sentences used , instead of 、.

I scrolled through about half of the 1000 hits and didn't really spot usage for case 1. This doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but it's certainly far less common than case 2 and 3.

Other notable counts:
｛〘品詞＝連体詞〙｝｛反面｝＝ 212
｛反面｝｛教師｝＝ 64

Unidic generally classes 反面 as a 名詞-普通名詞-副詞可能



（３）Representations of the conjunctive use in other references:

Daijs: 2（副詞的に用いて）他の面から見る場合。他面。「水に強い―、熱に弱い」
Smk:（副）
その物事に関して、まず第一にあげられる面に対して、それとは対照的な面もありうると判断する様子。
「娘の結婚はうれしい━寂しくもある」
Koj: ②（副詞的に）反対の面から見て。「陽気な―、涙もろいところがある」

Though I believe they aren't quite sufficient.

.

Proposing a reordering of the senses, and an additional sense.

＞ Should we re-order the senses?
I think they should very much be reordered, but I'm not sure about that [rare] tag. 
In Anonさん's example 反面 is certainly a noun, forming a larger contrastive adverbial frame with ある面では.
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

I believe there are three cases to distinguish here, if we want to be precise:
Case 1: the plain noun 反面 (which does appear to be rather uncommon)
Case 2: grammaticalized 反面 as a plain conjunction/conjunctive adverb, i.e. a *自立語*
Case 3: grammaticalized 反面 as a conjunctive particle taking a 連体修飾語, i.e. a *付属語*

This paradigm is presented in（１）
Counts for the separate cases are presented in（２）



Furthermore I would assert that in case 3, 反面 is most naturally translated as "while", "though", and so forth, but not really as "on the other hand".
While in case 2 (this includes その反面), it is something like "on the other hand" or "then again"
Take this sentence from Brian's quoted site as an example (https://nihongo-online.jp/net/index.php?key=bbjgig41h-81):

「大学が決まって、新しい生活に期待する『反面』、不安も大きい。」
"I’ve decided on my university, and while I'm anticipating my new life, I also have big worries."

This is also substantiated by DOJG examples + translations
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

While looking at the corpus data I noticed that case 2 uses of 反面 are often preceded by another conjunction or conjunctive particle.
If there is interest, I could also provide counts for various of those cases.

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

I've purposefully left out the 半面・反面 discussion here so as to not make it more confusing than it already is.
That should probably be the next step after this entry alone has been settled.

@@ -13,4 +13,7 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>opposite side</gloss>
-<gloss>reverse</gloss>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<s_inf>after the attributive form of a verb or adjective, or the particle の</s_inf>
+<gloss>while</gloss>
+<gloss>although</gloss>
+<gloss>though</gloss>
+<gloss>but</gloss>
@@ -22,3 +25,10 @@
-<gloss>though</gloss>
-<gloss>although</gloss>
-<gloss>while</gloss>
+<gloss>at the same time</gloss>
+<gloss>then again</gloss>
+<gloss>and yet</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>opposite side</gloss>
+<gloss>other side</gloss>
+<gloss>reverse</gloss>

女の子ってのは、ある面では現実的で打算的だけど、反面では理想とか夢を持ち続けてるものなんだから。

yet, it really didn't take me a whole lot of time to find a sample for sense 1

Aligning with 文系.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2615500">理科系</xref>
+<gloss>humanities, social sciences, and fine arts</gloss>
@@ -14 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>humanities</gloss>

GG5, 新和英中辞典

That original meaning was rather off.

@@ -13,2 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>literary group</gloss>
-<gloss>(liberal) arts</gloss>
+<gloss>liberal arts</gloss>

Eijiro

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>(liberal) arts</gloss>
+<gloss>humanities</gloss>

gg5, daij

GG5 has "planograph" but that refers to the *print* made by planography.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>lithography</gloss>
+<field>&print;</field>
+<gloss>planography</gloss>
+<gloss>planographic printing</gloss>

OK, I guess. Perhaps a bit too split.

@@ -45,0 +46 @@
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>

Most references don't perform this split, and I personally don't think the glosses are different enough to warrant it.
"To make a living (somewhere)" can have a very similar meaning to "to get by" or "to live (on)".
暮らす generally carries a nuance of daily activity and/or sustenance for the "living" sense, so having all these five glosses in one sense seems fine to me.
The other JEs agree.

On top of that "to get (along, by)" doesn't work in my eyes.

@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to get (along, by)</gloss>
+<gloss>to get along</gloss>
+<gloss>to get by</gloss>

It's not really about how one earns a living, mostly about how one spends their life. It's just one possible nuance not the main meaning of the word.

東京で暮らしています I live in Tokyo - no actual implication of a job or money, just a life situation.
働いて暮らしています I make a living by working

@@ -22,0 +23,6 @@
+<gloss>to lead a life</gloss>
+<gloss>to get (along, by)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>to get along</gloss>
-<gloss>to lead a life</gloss>

GG5, Prog, Luminous, Chuujiten, Shinsen, Meikyo

Meikyo: 本来は自動詞「暮れる」の他動詞形。今は自動詞と意識される。
Oukoku12 (very new) tags our second sense separately as transitive, as does GendaiShinkoku7
Sankoku has both tags for both senses

Both sankoku and gendaiShinkoku call our second sense dated.

.

Expanding and concretizing.

@@ -22 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>to live</gloss>
+<gloss>to live (on, by, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to make a living</gloss>
+<gloss>to earn a livelihood</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -29 +32,12 @@
-<gloss>to spend (time)</gloss>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>to spend one's time (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pass one's days (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>to live</gloss>
+<gloss>to get on (doing)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<gloss>to do daily</gloss>
+<gloss>to do all day long</gloss>
+<gloss>to continue doing</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&biol;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/マタタビ
>> 漢方では木天蓼（もくてんりょう）という。
https://www.babakanpou.co.jp/contents/minkan/matatabi.html
>> 生薬名"木天蓼（もくてんりょう）"

The もくてんりょう reading is used in 漢方. It needs to be split out anyway as [uk] only applies to またたび.

@@ -15,4 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>もくてんりょう</reb>
-<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 木天蓼　　　　 │   5,556 │  1.4% │[rK]
│ またたび　　　 │ 281,883 │ 68.6% │
│ マタタビ　　　 │ 123,317 │ 30.0% │moving up
│ もくてんりょう │     443 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
またたび is 熟字訓 for 木天蓼

.

I think もくてんりょう should get [rk]. I can't see it anywhere apart from the quoted jawiki article.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,3 +10 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>もくてんりょう</reb>
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>
@@ -15,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>もくてんりょう</reb>
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actinidia_polygama

I agree - it's straying into encyclopedia territory. The JEs don't mention it.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<s_inf>causes euphoria in cats, akin to catnip</s_inf>

daijr: 自然科学。明治初期には特に物理学の称。
nikk: 自然科学。特に、明治初期の物理学の名称。
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/宋明理学
>> 代・明代の儒学を代表するテーマが「理」であることからその名がつき、単に「理学」とも呼ばれる。

The kokugos say that the physics and philosophy senses are from the early Meiji era. Sankoku, meikyo and smk don't have either of them. I think [obs] is appropriate.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>physical science</gloss>
+<gloss>(physical) science</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
@@ -28 +29,3 @@
-<gloss>lixue (Song-era Chinese philosophy)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1437610">哲学</xref>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>philosophy</gloss>
@@ -32,3 +35,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1437610">哲学</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>philosophy</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841502">宋明理学</xref>
+<gloss>neo-Confucianism</gloss>

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1502800">物理学</xref>

gg5 koj daijs jwkiki(理学)

natural science = physical science + life science
the refs are inconsistent, so let's have it both ways
the term is probably a bit obscure anyway

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>natural science</gloss>

prog: 理工科  a science and engineering course
      理工学部  a department of science and engineering

All the kokugos define this as 理学と工学.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>science and technology</gloss>
+<gloss>science and engineering</gloss>

All the references I have checked have 裏声 associated with the term "falsetto" in English. The only exception is Eijiro, which has "falsetto●falsetto voice●head voice". I do not regard the two terms as having the same meaning.
I was tempted to have "head voice" as a separate sense, with an xref to 頭声, but I don't think the case is strong enough.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>head voice</gloss>

A previous comment noted that the term 頭声 exists as a literal equivalent to "head voice," but this is a pedogogical term used to mirror Western operatic terminology. 裏声 is the most common, understood word in spoken Japanese, and it is used loosely in a way that covers both the concepts of head voice and falsetto. It's also noteworthy that in English, the usage of the term "head voice" is not consistent either, as acknowledged by the very start of its Wikipedia article: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_voice

Including "head voice" as another definition should be fine; having both shows the vagueness of the term.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>head voice</gloss>

*calque

"Head voice" exists in Japanese as 頭声, a claque of "Kopfstimme" from German according to kojien.
None of my refs mention 頭声 in their definitions for 裏声.

Please offer a few words of explanation and/or relevant quotes from the article when using links as references.

@@ -14,4 +13,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>head voice</gloss>
-</sense>

https://utaten.com/karaoke/falset/

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>head voice</gloss>
+</sense>

勿体ない　　   307,632   7.2% 
勿体無い　　   521,556  12.2% 
物体ない　　        64   0.0% -sK
物体無い　　        20   0.0% -sK
もったいない 3,433,739  80.5%

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daij

Never heard it used to mean "sacrilegious"

@@ -24,3 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>impious</gloss>
-<gloss>profane</gloss>
-<gloss>sacrilegious</gloss>
+<gloss>wasteful</gloss>
+<gloss>a waste</gloss>
@@ -38 +37,3 @@
-<gloss>wasteful</gloss>
+<gloss>impious</gloss>
+<gloss>profane</gloss>
+<gloss>sacrilegious</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2868142">帯鋸・おびのこぎり</xref>

daij, meikyo
帯鋸	4,235	57.3%	
帯のこ	3,156	42.7%

The kokugos say that おびのこ is an abbreviation of おびのこぎり. I'll split out the latter.

@@ -8,2 +8 @@
-<keb>帯のこぎり</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>帯のこ</keb>
@@ -14,3 +12,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おびのこぎり</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>bandsaw</gloss>

Mazegaki addition (maze5)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>帯のこぎり</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

There are two different words here. I'll split out 宇宙科学.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>宇宙科学</keb>
@@ -15,3 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>cosmo-chemistry</gloss>
-<gloss>space science</gloss>
+<gloss>cosmochemistry</gloss>

gg5, chujiten, prog, wisdom, daij

Not just science.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>practical learning</gloss>
+<gloss>practical studies</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>studies with real applications</gloss>

daij, koj, meikyo

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>(study of) Confucianism (esp. neo-Confucianism)</gloss>
+<gloss>(study of) Confucianism (esp. the Cheng-Zhu school of neo-Confucianism)</gloss>

@@ -26 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>Edo-period popularized blend of Buddhist, Shinto and Confucian ethical teachings (popularised)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Shingaku (Edo-period moral philosophy)</gloss>

Style alignment.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>(the study of) Confucianism (esp. neo-Confucianism)</gloss>
+<gloss>(study of) Confucianism (esp. neo-Confucianism)</gloss>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>(the study of) Taoism</gloss>
+<gloss>(study of) Taoism</gloss>

gg5, chujiten, reverso

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<gloss>academic paper</gloss>
+<gloss>scholarly paper</gloss>
+<gloss>academic article</gloss>
@@ -13,3 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>monograph</gloss>
-<gloss>study</gloss>
-<gloss>paper (scientific, technical)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/研究科
>> 研究科とは、専門分野に応じて、教育研究上の目的から組織される大学院の基本となる組織。大学院における研究科の位置づけは、大学における学部に相当する。
https://www.env.nagoya-u.ac.jp/

This term is used for the various "graduate schools" of a Japanese university. e.g. 名古屋大学大学院環境学研究科 - University of Nagoya Graduate School of Environment Studies.
Wikipedia describes it as a 組織, and the graduate school equivalent of a 学部.

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>graduate program</gloss>
+<gloss>graduate school (of)</gloss>

Both will be clearer.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>(post-)graduate course</gloss>
+<gloss>postgraduate course</gloss>
+<gloss>graduate course</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>(post)graduate course</gloss>
+<gloss>(post-)graduate course</gloss>

prog

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>department of science and technology</gloss>
+<gloss>department of science and engineering</gloss>

I'd keep it, but not a big deal.

For タバコ, we decided just to drop the nokanji tag. I think we should do the same here.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 柳葉魚　 │   8,263 │  2.6% │
│ ししゃも │ 240,181 │ 77.0% │
│ シシャモ │  63,547 │ 20.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
ししゃも・シシャモ is 熟字訓 for 柳葉魚

Kanjipedia, Sankoku

.

Wouldn't we usually have it as 柳葉魚：シシャモ since it's a foreign word used with kanji as 熟字訓?
I mean, I can see that ししゃも is used a lot, and sankoku even gives it as a headword. So it does make sense to have it.
But most kokugos have it as 柳葉魚：シシャモ, as described.

What about having a [nokanji] tag on ししゃも instead? Just out of curiosity
This way we would dissociate ししゃも from the kanji form and have シシャモ be the reading.

It doesn't give an error but I doubt it has been done before, has it?

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

nikk: (アイヌsusam)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/シシャモ#名称
>> シシャモ」という名称は、アイヌ語のsusam（スサム、語源はsusu（スス（シュシュ））＝楊、ham（ハム）＝葉とされる）に由来する。

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ain">susuhamu</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="ain">susam</lsource>

ピビンパプ is in daijs. I think we should keep at least one of the 〜パプ forms visible.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<reb>ピビンパ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<reb>ピビンパプ</reb>
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<reb>ピビンパプ</reb>
+<reb>ピビンパ</reb>
@@ -27,0 +28,2 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
+<lsource xml:lang="kor"/>

ビビンバ　　 353,398  86.6% 
ビビンパ　　  41,455  10.2% 
ピビンパ　　  11,299   2.8% -sk
ピビンパプ　   1,283   0.3% -sk
ビビンバップ     213   0.1% -sk
ピビムパプ　     589   0.1% -sk

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daijs
g ng

ビビンバ	353398
ビビンパ	41455
ピビンパプ	1283
ビビンバップ	213
ピビムパプ	589
ピビンパ	11299

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<reb>ピビンパ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ピビムパプ</reb>

gg5, jawiki
入れ替え戦	105,602	75.2%	
入替戦	        28,755	20.5%	
入替え戦	        4,404	3.1%	
入換え戦	        756	0.5%	
入れ換え戦	688	0.5%	
入れ替戦	        68	0.0%	
入換戦	        63	0.0%

Only used unofficially in sumo. We could have a separate sense for it but it's probably not needed.

@@ -4,0 +5,10 @@
+<keb>入れ替え戦</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>入替戦</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>入替え戦</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +16,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>入換え戦</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,2 +27,2 @@
-<field>&sumo;</field>
-<gloss>match-up between wrestlers from different divisions who will probably 'switch' divisions in new ranking</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>playoff match to determine promotion and relegation (played between bottom-ranked teams of the higher division and top-ranked teams of the lower division)</gloss>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>match-up between sumo wrestlers from different divisions who will probably 'switch' divisions in new ranking</gloss>
+<gloss>match-up between wrestlers from different divisions who will probably 'switch' divisions in new ranking</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<field>&sumo;</field>

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ うちの嬶　　 │  97 │ 26.3% │
│ うちの嚊　　 │   0 │  0.0% │ add rK
│ うちのかかあ │ 139 │ 37.7% │
│ うちのカカア │ 133 │ 36.0% │ add
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯
Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ かかあ天下　 │ 9,476 │ 49.6% │
│ カカア天下　 │ 6,289 │ 32.9% │
│ かかあ殿下　 │ 1,557 │  8.1% │
│ カカァ天下　 │ 1,105 │  5.8% │
│ 嬶天下　　　 │   282 │  1.5% │
│ 嚊天下　　　 │    89 │  0.5% │
│ かかあでんか │   322 │  1.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

many of my refs point to かかあ天下

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カカア</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

sankoku:〔古風〕
meikyo: 自分の妻または他人の妻を親しんで呼ぶ語。また、乱暴に呼ぶ語。

かか is archaic. The JEs and smaller kokugos don't have it. I think it can be dropped.
"missus" is a lot more common than "missis". I don't think we need both as glosses.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かか</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +15,2 @@
+<misc>&fam;</misc>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>the missis</gloss>

JEs

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>the missis</gloss>
+<gloss>the missus</gloss>

rare? rK?
occurs in かかあ天下

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>ripsaw</gloss>

Aligning. Appears that 縦挽き鋸 always refers to a handsaw.

@@ -9,3 +9,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2127470">縦挽き鋸</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2127470">縦挽き鋸</xref>
-<gloss>ripsaw</gloss>
+<gloss>rip saw (machine)</gloss>
+<gloss>straight-line rip saw</gloss>

リップソー	136		
リップソ	        0

Uncommon but it gets some web hits.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2127470">縦挽き鋸</xref>

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>リップソ</reb>
+<reb>リップソー</reb>

Entry created

縦挽き鋸	        154		
縦びき鋸	        0		
縦ひき鋸	        0		
縦びきのこ	0		
たてびき鋸	0	
縦引き鋸	        37   - non-standard kanji

I can't find a source for たてひき.

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>縦ひき鋸</keb>
+<keb>縦びきのこ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +12,2 @@
-<keb>縦びきのこ</keb>
+<keb>縦引き鋸</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +16,2 @@
-<keb>たてびき鋸</keb>
+<keb>縦引きのこ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,8 +20,0 @@
-<re_restr>縦挽き鋸</re_restr>
-<re_restr>縦びきのこ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>たてびき鋸</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たてひきのこ</reb>
-<re_restr>縦挽き鋸</re_restr>
-<re_restr>縦ひき鋸</re_restr>

Entry created

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yangmingism
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/school-of-mind

I think this is clearer.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1328520">朱子学</xref>
-<gloss>neo-Confucianism (based on the teachings of Wang Yangming and his followers)</gloss>
+<gloss>Yangmingism (school of neo-Confucianism based on the teachings of Wang Yangming)</gloss>
+<gloss>School of Mind</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1328520">朱子学</xref>
-<gloss>Song-period neo-Confucianism (based esp. on the teachings of Zhu Xi)</gloss>
+<gloss>Song-dynasty neo-Confucianism (esp. the teachings of Zhu Xi)</gloss>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheng–Zhu_school
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/朱子学
>> 日本で使われる用語であり、中国では、朱熹がみずからの先駆者と位置づけた北宋の程頤と合わせて程朱学（程朱理学）・程朱学派と呼ばれる。
程朱学	164			
朱子学	36,208

Equivalent in meaning to 朱子学.
A lot less common than 朱子学 but I don't think it needs a rare tag. Plenty of hits on the web and Google Books.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2247260">宋学</xref>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>neo-Confucianism (based on the teaching of the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1328520">朱子学</xref>
+<gloss>Cheng-Zhu school (of neo-Confucianism)</gloss>
+<gloss>neo-Confucianism of the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>neo-Confucianism (esp. from the Song period)</gloss>
+<gloss>neo-Confucianism (esp. of the Song dynasty)</gloss>

Entry created

I don't think the x-ref is needed. This isn't an adverb.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1609970">知らず識らず</xref>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<gloss>not aware of what one is doing</gloss>
+<gloss>being unaware of what one is doing</gloss>

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ソーシャル・エンジニアリング
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_engineering_(security)

Two senses in daijs. Web results are dominated by sense 2.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2868121">社会工学</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>social engineering (in information security)</gloss>

Not just comp.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ソーシャル・エンジニアリング</reb>

リッピングソフトウェア	250		
リッピングソフトウエア	0	- daijs
リッピングソフト	        4,258

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>リッピングソフトウエア</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2868137">リッピングソフト</xref>
@@ -13,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>ripper</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>リッピング・ソフトウェア</reb>

Entry created

https://dailyexcelhacks.blog/excel-3d-chart-basics/
https://www.javadrive.jp/excelgraph/contour_plot/

Seems to be an Excel term.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>contour graph</gloss>
+<gloss>surface chart</gloss>
+<gloss>contour plot</gloss>

Entry created

At that time we weren't using [gikun] if it was the only reading on the entry.

This should probably not have been removed. The まどろむ entry has it.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

OK, splitting.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>微睡み</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,3 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>びすい</reb>

微睡の	1014
微睡みの	5649
微睡が	25
微睡みが	123

I want to add 微睡み but I think it would be better to split out まどろみ into a separate entry. I'm not fond of restr tags in cases like this. Also, uk doesn't apply to びすい.

インタリオ	3,741  - jawiki, RP
インタリヨ	0      - daijr/s

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>インタリヨ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>intaglio</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ita"/>
+<gloss>intaglio (design or piece of art)</gloss>

Entry created

眼梶木　     20   0.0% -rK (daijr)
眼旗魚　     62   0.2% -rK (daijs)
目旗魚　      0   0.0% -rK (gg5)
目梶木　     74   0.2% -rK (daijs)
めかじき 14,603  36.5% 
メカジキ 25,302  63.2%

@@ -5 +5,2 @@
-<keb>眼梶木</keb>
+<keb>目梶木</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>眼梶木</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +18 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>目梶木</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>目旗魚</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>目梶木</keb>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_ring

Appears to be wasei.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>college ring</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">college ring</lsource>
+<gloss>class ring</gloss>
+<gloss>graduation ring</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カレッジ・リング</reb>

Entry created

daijr/s, koj, nikk

Daijs and nikk have sense 1. Daijr and koj have sense 2.

@@ -9 +9,9 @@
-<gloss>graver</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2868153">ビュラン・1</xref>
+<gloss>graver (engraving tool)</gloss>
+<gloss>burin</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2868152">彫器</xref>
+<field>&archeol;</field>
+<gloss>burin</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1933100">救援投手</xref>
@@ -25,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>fireman</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>reliever</gloss>
-<gloss>fireman</gloss>

daij, gg5

Daijr redirects to 定火消し, which is defined as an Edo period firefighter.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>fireman</gloss>
+<gloss>firefighter (Edo period)</gloss>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>fixer</gloss>
+<gloss>troubleshooter</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>fireman</gloss>

中辞典, Daijr, GG5

Refs don't mention Edo.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>fireman (in Edo)</gloss>
+<gloss>fireman</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
+<gloss>relief pitcher</gloss>
+<gloss>reliever</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>fireman (in Edo)</gloss>
+<gloss>firefighter (Edo period)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>in urine</gloss>
+<gloss>in the urine</gloss>

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +12 @@
-<gloss>urine</gloss>
+<gloss>in urine</gloss>

Entry created

放送問題用語	29		
放送禁止用語	40,779

Not in my refs. Very few web hits. I think it can go.

Fiddling.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>words you can't say on TV (or radio)</gloss>
-<gloss>taboo words banned from broadcast</gloss>
+<gloss>words you can't say on TV or radio</gloss>
+<gloss>taboo words banned from broadcasts</gloss>

Submitting together with this 放送禁止用語 or we'll probably 
forget to align it (if the edit is approved).

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>banned word</gloss>
-<gloss>word which is not allowed to be used on TV or radio</gloss>
+<gloss>words you can't say on TV (or radio)</gloss>
+<gloss>taboo words banned from broadcast</gloss>

Entry created

daijr/s

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>bedroom entrance</gloss>
+<gloss>entrance to a bedroom</gloss>
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1192280">家庭</xref>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>household</gloss>

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>conjugal relationaship</gloss>
+<gloss>conjugal relationship</gloss>

GG5

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>family</gloss>
+<gloss>family life</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>conjugal relationaship</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/文系と理系
>> それぞれ文科系、理科系とも呼ばれ

Aligning with 理系.

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>science course</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1505180">文科系</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1505180">文科系</xref>
+<gloss>the sciences</gloss>
+<gloss>STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics)</gloss>

GG5, 新和英中辞典

Eij

GG5, RP, Chuujiten


Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 風媒　 │ 5,470 │ 97.9% │
│ 風媒の │   116 │  2.1% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────┴───────╯
.

I think one sense is enough.

Not too sure about that [adj-no] tag, but I think it can stay here.
Most references give an ～の example as well

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&bot;</field>
@@ -13,4 +14,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>anemophilous</gloss>

koj, gg5, eij

OK. Thanks.

https://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/12/22/1314343_05.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
>>「わいせつ行為」とは、強姦、強制わいせつ（１３歳以上の者への暴行・脅迫によるわいせつ行為及び１３歳未満の者へのわいせつ行為）、公然わいせつ、わいせつ物頒布等、買春、痴漢、のぞき、陰部等の露出、青少年保護条例等違反、不適切な裸体・下着姿等の撮影（隠し撮り等を含む。）、わいせつ目的をもって体に触ること等をいう。

There isn't a meaningful difference between わいせつ行為 and わいせつな行為. I was just noting that there's nothing in Japanese law that defines わいせつ行為 as "sexual molestation".
Most online sources only mention molestation and indecent exposure but the above definition from MEXT includes rape and prostitution.
The Japanese Law Translation website translates わいせつな行為 as "indecent act".
I think the term is broad enough in legal contexts that a second sense isn't necessary.

@@ -19,9 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2176050">わいせつ罪</xref>
-<gloss>sexual molestation</gloss>
-<gloss>indecent exposure</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>lewd behavior</gloss>
-<gloss>obscene act</gloss>
-<gloss>indecent conduct</gloss>
+<gloss>indecent act (esp. molestation or indecent exposure)</gloss>

>"わいせつ行為" doesn't appear in Japanese law.

seems to still be used in legal/technical contexts but i'm not too familiar with how the [law] tag is used in JMdict

>"わいせつ*な*行為" does but it describes other acts besides molestation, e.g. indecent exposure.

i don't believe "わいせつな行為" and "わいせつ行為" are meaningfully different, they're e.g. used interchangeably by newspapers
indecent exposure directed at children is considered molestation, probably a good idea to add it as a gloss, but わいせつ行為 is also used for e.g. groping https://www.nagoyatv.com/news/?id=033103

>isn't the "sexual" in "sexual molestation" redundant?

i guess "molestation" has come to pretty much always mean something of a sexual nature, but it's not strictly redundant esp. in more technical/legal contexts

>I'm not sure there's more than one sense here.

the second sense is certainly more colloquial but i've seen it

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<field>&law;</field>
@@ -21,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>indecent exposure</gloss>

https://wakailaw.com/keiji/11426
>>「わいせつな行為」という文言は、刑法にはっきりと明記されています。たとえば、公然わいせつ罪、不同意わいせつ罪（旧強制わいせつ罪）、監護者わいせつ罪などに「わいせつな行為」という文言が使われています。

Are there any references that support this amendment?
"わいせつ行為" doesn't appear in Japanese law. "わいせつ*な*行為" does but it describes other acts besides molestation, e.g. indecent exposure.
I'm not sure there's more than one sense here. Also, isn't the "sexual" in "sexual molestation" redundant?

I guess so.

daijr		
コードシェアリング	424	
コードシェア	45,722

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2736030">コードシェア</xref>
+<field>&aviat;</field>
@@ -12,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>codesharing</gloss>

koj

コードシェア	45,722	99.6%	
コード・シェア	180	0.4%

One word in English, sometimes hyphenated.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<field>&aviat;</field>

daijs, wiki

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss>to lock eyes with</gloss>
+<gloss>to lock eyes (with)</gloss>

見つめ合う 38,308  48.4% 
見つめあう 26,840  33.9% 
見詰め合う 11,487  14.5% 
見詰めあう    129   0.2% -sK
みつめあう  2,397   3.0%

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

reordered by googits

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>見詰め合う</keb>
+<keb>見つめ合う</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>見つめ合う</keb>
+<keb>見詰め合う</keb>

Eijiro

I'm fairly confident.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<s_inf>by confusion with テリーヌ</s_inf>

https://www.meiji.co.jp/hello-chocolate/column/93/

I suspect that the "chocolate cake" usage is just people confusing it with ショコラテリーヌ (chocolate terrine).

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2831169">パンオショコラ</xref>
@@ -9,0 +11 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
@@ -11 +13,6 @@
-<gloss>chocolate cake (esp. layered)</gloss>
+<gloss>pain au chocolat</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>chocolate terrine</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/宋明理学

Plenty of web hits. Not rare in academia.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>neo-Confucianism</gloss>
+<gloss>neo-Confucianism (developed in the Song and Ming dynasties)</gloss>
+<gloss>Song-Ming neo-Confucianism</gloss>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1329510">儒教</xref>

宋明理学	339

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/宋明理学
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Confucianism