研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; Babylon Japanese-English - "n. poison nerve gas, poisonous chemical gas used in battle to paralyze the respiratory and central nervous system"

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>sarin (nerve gas)</gloss>
+<gloss>sarin (nerve agent)</gloss>

tidying

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>Sarin (type of poison nerve-gas)</gloss>
+<gloss>sarin (nerve gas)</gloss>

daij, koj
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_glider
https://www.jsal.or.jp/page/glider

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +14,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>primary glider</gloss>
+<gloss>simple training glider</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/プライマリ・ケア
プライマリケア	26,349		
プライマリーケア	10,806

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>プライマリケア</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プライマリ・ケア</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プライマリー・ケア</reb>

プライマリーヘルスケア	1079	57.0%
プライマリヘルスケア	815	43.0%

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>プライマリヘルスケア</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プライマリ・ヘルス・ケア</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プライマリー・ヘルス・ケア</reb>

Aligning.

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>Japan Innovation Party</gloss>
@@ -33 +33,0 @@
-<gloss>Japan Innovation Party</gloss>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6409095
維新と国民、改憲に向け連携　9日にも幹事長、国対委員長会談

@@ -27,0 +28,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2834694">日本維新の会</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Nippon Ishin no Kai</gloss>
+<gloss>Japan Innovation Party</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1532470">明治維新</xref>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

You need to make a case for such an edit.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>one person</gloss>
-<gloss>one member</gloss>
+<gloss>a person</gloss>
+<gloss>a member</gloss>

I think this is ok.

or "a"?

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>person</gloss>
-<gloss>member</gloss>
+<gloss>one person</gloss>
+<gloss>one member</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_country

I don't think "emerging nation" is a standard term.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>emerging nation</gloss>

@@ -5 +5,2 @@
-<keb>開発途上国{spec1]</keb>
+<keb>開発途上国</keb>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>

G n-grams 6187766

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>開発途上国</keb>
+<keb>開発途上国{spec1]</keb>
@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

中辞典: 50気圧に相当する圧力 a pressure of 50 atmospheres

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>air pressure</gloss>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss>atmospere (unit of pressure)</gloss>
+<gloss>atmosphere (unit of pressure)</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/気圧?dictCode=SGKDJ  def. 3
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/標準気圧

@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&physics;</field>
+<gloss>atmospere (unit of pressure)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5
smk: (1)その領域において、発達が遅れている国。「国際化という点ではまだまだ―だ」
     (2)「発展途上国」の旧称。先進国

Added sense.
"third world country" is an ambiguous term. I think it should be avoided here.

@@ -16,2 +16,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1202890">開発途上国・かいはつとじょうこく</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1202890">開発途上国・かいはつとじょうこく</xref>
+<gloss>backward country</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1202890">開発途上国</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1202890">開発途上国</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -19,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>undeveloped country</gloss>
-<gloss>third world country</gloss>
+<gloss>underdeveloped country</gloss>
+<gloss>developing country</gloss>

daijs

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1202890">開発途上国・かいはつとじょうこく</xref>

To be safe it probably should be omitted.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>primary care provider</gloss>

I guess the scope is broader, though I'm unaware if there's a better related term in Japanese. It's just what I've seen personally. For example, when you go to a clinic, they will ask who your primary care provider is.

https://www.bswhealth.com/blog/what-is-a-primary-care-physician-and-why-do-i-have-a-care-team
>> A primary care provider can be a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician assistant who helps you manage your everyday health.

"primary care provider" is a broader term. Even if it typically refers to a doctor, I'm not sure it's needed as a gloss here.

This is the common term in America.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>primary care provider</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 小遣い　 │ 7,682,602 │ 85.1% │
│ 小遣　　 │    76,589 │  0.8% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 小づかい │     1,535 │  0.0% │
│ 小ずかい │       661 │  0.0% │
│ こづかい │ 1,233,878 │ 13.7% │
│ こずかい │    36,884 │  0.4% │ - [ik] to [sk]
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +22 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

2441350 should probably be merged

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>小遣</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

〈消（し）／けし／ケシ〉〈護謨／ごむ／ゴム〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 消しゴム │ 1,103,833 │ 96.1% │
│ 消ゴム　 │     5,790 │  0.5% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 消しごむ │     1,639 │  0.1% │ - add
│ 消し護謨 │        40 │  0.0% │
│ 消ごむ　 │        25 │  0.0% │
│ けしごむ │    16,080 │  1.4% │ - add
│ ケシゴム │    15,119 │  1.3% │ - add
│ けしゴム │     5,973 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>消しごむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +23,8 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>けしごむ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ケシゴム</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>India rubber</gloss>
+<gloss>rubber</gloss>

消しゴム	1103833
消ゴム	5790
消し護謨	40

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>消ゴム</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>advanced (developed) country</gloss>
-<gloss>advanced nations</gloss>
+<gloss>developed country</gloss>
+<gloss>advanced country</gloss>

chujiten

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1202890">開発途上国</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1202890">開発途上国</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -13,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>undeveloped country</gloss>
-<gloss>third world country</gloss>
+<gloss>underdeveloped country</gloss>
+<gloss>developing country</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1477740">発展途上国・はってんとじょうこく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1477740">発展途上国</xref>

djr

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1477740">発展途上国・はってんとじょうこく</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/倍数-112869#w-598898

daijs

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&math;</field>

発展途上国	265,879		
開発途上国	6,187,766

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1202890">開発途上国</xref>

To me "luscious" doesn't really fit with delicacy or delectable. I'd drop it.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>luscious dish</gloss>

I was mainly a bit sceptical about the noun "dainty" being this obscure in AmE, since neither oxford nor webster note that it's chiefly BrE.
However, I'm not an AmE native speaker as you are so I will obviously concede on that aspect.
As for AI, I may also be a bit biased against it, but the chat you provided was an interesting read.
This does seem reasonable to me now, thank you for the reply.

A long, maybe interesting, but ultimately tangential conversation about "dainty". Only for the curious about AI
https://chatgpt.com/share/69173d24-5a04-8008-a058-6261baff2491

I think having [form] is preferable to not having it, even if it's imperfect.  This is certainly not a common oral form. I didn't add [form] myself only because of previous comments.

Re:AI citations. Language analysis is a unique capability of LLMs. They didn't "learn" the answer by reading every reference book, and thus they have no citations to give.  The answers about word meanings are essentially digital "intuition", informed by simultaneously processing every digitized text in existence and building weights between words in every language. Because of this, I think their "opinion" on language is generally worth consideration.  Yes, hallucinations are possible(esp. when they don't know the answer).  LLMs should never be a primary source.  But if an LLM's analysis (esp. of *English*) agrees with my own intuition, that feels more weighty to me than my intuition on its own.  If I think a word is obsolete in AmE, and chatgpt thinks it's obsolete in AmE, I feel pretty confident.

That said, it is eminently possible to lead an LLM to any answer you want, even by accident.  That's why I usually also link whole conversations so the questioning is opaque.

I stand by my earlier comments on "dainty".  It's not (just) gemini saying it's misleading for AmE speakers, I am. I don't think the split makes any difference on that. In AmE "dainty" will be read as an adjective meaning "small/petite" no matter what you put it next to.  We'd have to tag it explicitly as (BrE) to avoid the problem (which we don't do).

BCCWJ:
｛美味［ビミ］｝＝ 527
｛美味［ビミ］；な｝＝ 44
｛美味［ビミ］；の｝＝ 9 

The word has relatively many counts in the BCCWJ and SHC(昭和・平成時代書き言葉）corpora, compared to only 5 total hits across all 話し言葉 corpora.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 美味　　 │ 2,708,045 │ 93.4% │
│ 美味な　 │   115,652 │  4.0% │
│ 美味の　 │    28,535 │  1.0% │
│ 美味なる │    46,574 │  1.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

Most kokugos: ...〈こと／飲食物〉
.

Sankoku now has its typical［文］, and GendaiShinkoku notes 「文章語的に」. I think it may now be appropriate to have a form tag.
But perhaps there still is a debate to be had given Robin's comments in 2020.

Two senses are clearer.

"cate" is archaic according to oxford and webster3.
GG5 also mentions "epicurean food" but I don't think we need that as a gloss.

I wouldn't mind having "dainty" as a lower gloss on sense two, there's really nothing "misleading" about that now, as gemini calls it, since that sense only has a [n] PoS.

On a sidenote, I still think if AI is used as a reference, it should be asked to provide references and sources itself for what it's saying. These models are all extremely prone to making up information.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>delicacy</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -20,0 +21,8 @@
+<gloss>highly palatable flavor</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>delicacy</gloss>
+<gloss>delectable dish</gloss>
+<gloss>luscious dish</gloss>

I guess so. I don't have a problem with "{a} dainty" but it seems rather old-fashioned to me.
Possibly two senses.

OK, I guess. Perhaps a bit too split.

@@ -45,0 +46 @@
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>

Most references don't perform this split, and I personally don't think the glosses are different enough to warrant it.
"To make a living (somewhere)" can have a very similar meaning to "to get by" or "to live (on)".
暮らす generally carries a nuance of daily activity and/or sustenance for the "living" sense, so having all these five glosses in one sense seems fine to me.
The other JEs agree.

On top of that "to get (along, by)" doesn't work in my eyes.

@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to get (along, by)</gloss>
+<gloss>to get along</gloss>
+<gloss>to get by</gloss>

It's not really about how one earns a living, mostly about how one spends their life. It's just one possible nuance not the main meaning of the word.

東京で暮らしています I live in Tokyo - no actual implication of a job or money, just a life situation.
働いて暮らしています I make a living by working

@@ -22,0 +23,6 @@
+<gloss>to lead a life</gloss>
+<gloss>to get (along, by)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>to get along</gloss>
-<gloss>to lead a life</gloss>

GG5, Prog, Luminous, Chuujiten, Shinsen, Meikyo

Meikyo: 本来は自動詞「暮れる」の他動詞形。今は自動詞と意識される。
Oukoku12 (very new) tags our second sense separately as transitive, as does GendaiShinkoku7
Sankoku has both tags for both senses

Both sankoku and gendaiShinkoku call our second sense dated.

.

Expanding and concretizing.

@@ -22 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>to live</gloss>
+<gloss>to live (on, by, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to make a living</gloss>
+<gloss>to earn a livelihood</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -29 +32,12 @@
-<gloss>to spend (time)</gloss>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>to spend one's time (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pass one's days (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>to live</gloss>
+<gloss>to get on (doing)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<gloss>to do daily</gloss>
+<gloss>to do all day long</gloss>
+<gloss>to continue doing</gloss>

GG5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>flattery</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/jeword/媚態#w-3218487

prog - adding another gloss

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>flirtatiousness</gloss>

3 sentences, all sense 1.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Splitting into senses.

@@ -23,2 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>to pull down</gloss>
-<gloss>to lower</gloss>
+<gloss>to lower (a price, tax, standard, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring down</gloss>
@@ -26 +26,19 @@
-<gloss>to withdraw</gloss>
+<gloss>to cut</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to demote</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to withdraw (a proposal, request, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to abandon</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to withdraw (troops, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pull back</gloss>
+<gloss>to move back</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 引き下げる │ 128,713 │ 95.6% │
│ 引下げる　 │   5,362 │  4.0% │ - sK
│ ひき下げる │      86 │  0.1% │
│ 引きさげる │      86 │  0.1% │
│ ひきさげる │     419 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijr, daijs

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_developed_countries
後発発展途上国	1,133		
後発々展途上国	0

Improper use of 々. The two 発s are not part of the same word.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>後発々展途上国</keb>
@@ -15 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>least developed among developing nations</gloss>
+<gloss>least developed countries</gloss>
+<gloss>LDC</gloss>

飽き足らぬ	771
中辞典: 《人が主語》 be ┏not satisfied [dissatisfied] 《with》; 《事が主語》 be unsatisfactory; be not good enough; leave something to be desired

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飽き足らぬ</keb>
@@ -26,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>leaving something to be desired</gloss>

Even as an "adjective", targets are 人, 方
飽き足らない	24014	  
飽き足らない人	3557	  
飽き足らない方	2490	  
飽き足らないオトナ	646	
飽き足らないユーザー	384	  
飽き足らないあなた	358	
飽き足らない私	144	  

に and で both are valid based on context, but for the note, I suggest に to pair with "with"/"by"
に飽き足らない	8072	91.4%
で飽き足らない	756	8.6%
しても飽き足らない	393

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/飽き足らない
スキーで飽き足らない人　->  visitors who aren't just satisfied with regular skiing.
舞台の上で踊るだけでは飽き足らないということに加えて -> there is an aspect of not being satisfied with dancing only on the stage
日本酒に飽き足らないアメリカ人 ->  The American who were unsatisfied with the sake produced in the United States

As a verb, the subject is also the person not-satisfied
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=飽き足
田舎町の幽閉されたような暮らしに飽き足りない
be dissatisfied with the confines of one's small-town life


Chatgpt suggestions, full discussion if curious:
https://chatgpt.com/share/690eb8fd-6a84-8008-ab38-c8166b46eb2d
Optional alternatives for “飽き足らない,” depending on tone or space

If you want to preserve nuance [of 飽きる] in fewer words:
insatiable (for / in) — literary, fits in concise glosses
still unsatisfied — implies “even after having much”
not content / not fully content — neutral but faithful

Regarding the [form] suggestion:
Modern Japanese speakers recognize it easily — it’s not obscure.

But it’s not part of active vocabulary for most people under ~40, unless they write or read literature.

It carries a slightly theatrical or “old-man storyteller” ring if used aloud.

Encountered in a comic: (〇〇しても飽き足らない - would be still unsatisfied if going so far as to do 〇〇).

We appear to have the wrong subject.  The "having one's fill" component requires the subject to be human. Ngrams show that even as an adjective, the targets are human (人, 方, etc). Cursory searches on x.com and news show the same pattern. I like this example from x: 現状に飽き足らない心 

飽きる has the nuance of having had one's fill of something but that still not being enough. Just glossing as "unsatisfied" doesn't communicate this nuance.  I think "(still) not" helps a bit. "even after/with xyz, still not satisfied".  

20~30-something college students/graduates reacted with some astonishment when I asked about the meaning.  They said they would *never* use this term themselves (written or otherwise).  It's obviously out there and in use, but [form] might be most accurate (chatgpt seems to think so).  Rare in spoken dialog.

@@ -22,2 +22,5 @@
-<gloss>unsatisfactory</gloss>
-<gloss>unsatisfying</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<s_inf>oft. as 〜に飽き足らない</s_inf>
+<gloss>unfulfilled (by)</gloss>
+<gloss>unsatisfied (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>(still) not satisfied</gloss>

飽き足らない 24,014  92.1% 
飽足らない　      0   0.0% - sK
慊らない　　     27   0.1% - rK (daijr)
あきたらない  2,042   7.8%

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>飽足らない</keb>
+<keb>慊らない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +12,2 @@
-<keb>慊らない</keb>
+<keb>飽足らない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, chujiten
本給	13,597		
基本給	117,000

@@ -16 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>basic or regular salary</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1756680">基本給</xref>
+<gloss>base salary</gloss>
+<gloss>basic salary</gloss>
+<gloss>base pay</gloss>
+<gloss>basic pay</gloss>

gg5, daij
滑空機	        11,080		
グライダー	171,060

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>sailplane</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1046300">グライダー</xref>

gg5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&astron;</field>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2170500">暗黒物質</xref>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダーク・マター</reb>

プライマリーバランス	22347	97.6%
プライマリバランス	557	2.4%

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プライマリバランス</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

GG5

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>プライマリー・バランス</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2653030">基礎的財政収支・きそてきざいせいしゅうし</xref>
@@ -10,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>PB</gloss>

note

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>メアリ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Here goes.

@@ -5,1 +5,4 @@
-<reb>メアリ</reb>
+<reb>ミアリー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミアリ</reb>
@@ -8,1 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>sometimes メアリ</s_inf>
@@ -11,4 +15,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Mary</gloss>
-</sense>

it might be worth having as that.  i'm not fussy about this one way or the other.

http://tangoro.com/merely has メアリ. So does http://zero.blush.jp/J/l.html
http://uminosoto.exblog.jp/1312412

A few hits, but most WWW examples of メアリ = merely come from EDICT.
Either we delete it, or we add "ミアリー/ミアリ", because that occurs too.
ミアリー gets 9k hits. We could do an entry for it, with a note "sometimes メアリ".

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

インプラント	1,861,465		
インプラントし	2,827

Not vs in my refs.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

Entry created

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; Babylon Japanese-English

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

Entry created

無公害が	87

Not a noun. I think "ecofriendly", while obviously in a related field,  is not really a gloss of this term.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>pollution-free</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>pollution-free</gloss>
-<gloss>ecofriendly</gloss>

GG5, Luminous, Prog

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 無公害　　　　 │ 41,537 │ 66.8% │
│ 無公害の　　　 │  5,957 │  9.6% │
│ 無公害塗料　　 │  3,841 │  6.2% │
│ 無公害で　　　 │  2,616 │  4.2% │
│ 無公害型　　　 │  1,631 │  2.6% │
│ 無公害・　　　 │  1,409 │  2.3% │
│ 無公害な　　　 │  1,308 │  2.1% │
│ 無公害天然　　 │  1,067 │  1.7% │
│ 無公害天然洗剤 │  1,009 │  1.6% │
│ 無公害化　　　 │    984 │  1.6% │
│ 無公害洗剤　　 │    844 │  1.4% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
https://massif.la/ja/search?q=無公害
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/無公害

I think "ecofriendly" could probably stay as a lower gloss.
"unpolluted" doesn't mean the same as the other glosses and should go in my opinion.

Putting [adj-no] first for better glossability, adding adj-na based on ngrams and a handful of examples I just saw on twitter when searching.

This could probably also get [adj-f]

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>unpolluted</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>clean (e.g. energy)</gloss>
+<gloss>pollution-free</gloss>

???

Not really the same thing.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>ecofriendly</gloss>

Entry created

ハイデフィニション gets significant more web hits and it's the only spelling in the kokugos.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ハイデフィニション</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>ハイデフィニション</reb>
+<reb>ハイ・デフィニション</reb>
@@ -13,3 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ハイ・デフィニション</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>HD</gloss>

ハイデフィニション	703	24.5%	
ハイ・デフィニション	235	8.2%	
ハイディフィニション	1,234	43.1%	
ハイ・ディフィニション	692	24.2%

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>ハイディフィニション</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ハイ・ディフィニション</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ハイ・デフィニション</reb>

Entry created

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&astron;</field>

Entry created

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

Entry created

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>dental rinse (i.e. mouthwash)</gloss>
+<gloss>dental rinse</gloss>
+<gloss>mouthwash</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>デンタル・リンス</reb>

Entry created

daij, meikyo

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

Entry created

Agree.

GG5 has "dark change" and none of the kokugos say it's wasei but I can't find any evidence it's used in English.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>dark change</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1154670">暗転・1</xref>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">dark change</lsource>
+<gloss>(theatrical) blackout</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダーク・チェンジ</reb>

Entry created

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>curling inwards (esp. the tips of one's hair)</gloss>
+<gloss>curling inwards (esp. of the tips of one's hair)</gloss>

内巻きが	247

Barely a noun.

内巻きボブ	290	92.1%
内巻きのボブ	25	7.9%

内巻きの	964	  

Some cherry-picked adj-f examples (any adj-no has lower ngrams than all of these):
内巻き	18817	  
内巻きカール	2538	  
内巻きパーマ	426	  
内巻きボブ	290	  
内巻きスタイル	222	  
内巻きヘア	213	  
内巻きエアロ	155 <- this is a car  
内巻きブロー	134


内巻きカール	2538	95.9%
内巻きのカール	47	1.8%
内巻カール	61	2.3%
内巻のカール	0	0.0%

内巻きに	5211	94.6%
内巻に	299	5.4%

Encountered as "内巻きのボブ" (woman's hair style).  Google shows this is common enough, but not nearly as common as adj-f.

Omitting き does not seem well-advised. Google will do the "did you mean?..." thing.  but it is in daijs. Maybe [rK]?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

daijr daijs
Google (relative kanji frequency)

Better

"American mainland" sounds a bit too informal to me.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>American mainland</gloss>
+<gloss>mainland United States</gloss>

GG5: the 「US [American] mainland
アメリカ合衆国本土	1085
アメリカ本土	52770
合衆国本土	565
アメリカ合衆国	626181 < - our entry 1149840

I don't think it's actually an abbreviation.

@@ -12,4 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>contiguous United States</gloss>
-<gloss>the U.S. mainland</gloss>
-<gloss>Lower 48</gloss>
+<gloss>US mainland</gloss>
+<gloss>American mainland</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アメリカ合衆国本土

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contiguous_United_States

I think this is clearer.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<gloss>FIRE (movement)</gloss>
+<gloss>Financial Independence, Retire Early</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -16,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>Financial Independence, Retire Early</gloss>
-<gloss>FIRE</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to become financially independent and retire early</gloss>

https://mynavi-agent.jp/dainishinsotsu/canvas/2021/08/post-524.html
日本語での読み方は「ファイア」あるいは「ファイヤー」で、簡単に言えば、経済的な自立をすることで早期リタイアをし、自由に暮らす生き方のことです。

jitsuyou:
ファイア【FIRE】

ok

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ファイア</reb>
+</r_ele>

Split from 1107620.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>specialty training (for doctors after 2-year initial clinical training)</gloss>
+<gloss>specialty training (for doctors after two-year initial clinical training)</gloss>

gg5, daijs

財布の紐	59563
財布のひも	12462
GG5, 中辞典

We already have 財布の紐を握る and 財布の紐を締める, which are far less common.

daijs
https://japan.zdnet.com/glossary/exp/ハイデフ/?s=4
https://e-words.jp/w/HD.html
ハイデフ	        20,582				
ハイデフ対応	1,160		
ハイデフで	1,093

ルミナス

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>person too dependent on credit</gloss>

大辞林　第四版

Rare, but in a couple of refs.

大辞泉 第二版

モールスコード	464
モールス符号	9029

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>モールス・コード</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Mose Code</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1969170">モールス符号</xref>
+<gloss>Morse Code</gloss>

https://ja.namu.wiki/w/모스 부호

See comments on 老人愛.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<field>&med;</field>
+<field>&psych;</field>

I think it's classed as a condition.

sexual preferences shouldn't be tagged med?

0 ngrams.

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2868046">老人愛</xref>
+<field>&med;</field>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/ジェロントフィリア

サウンドチェック	29316
RP, Daijs

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サウンド・チェック</reb>

maybe "sound tuning" as well

https://visipri.com/event-dictionary/1162-SoundCheck.php?srsltid=AfmBOoq2pdB_arYEad3P6P-kdADY4sVzbir1Pk2b1D6LxuocyQHJ4Wpt

カツライス	2988
Nikk

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カツライス

サイクルキャップ	590
WWW images.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>サイクル・キャップ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">cycle cap</lsource>

https://www.amazon.co.jp/サイクルキャップ/s?k=サイクルキャップ

ニュースメーカー	684
Daijisen

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ニュース・メーカー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>person prominent in the news</gloss>

https://if-tech.co.jp/entrusted_development/news-maker/

Not common.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1684130">暗号学</xref>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/クリプトロジー

GG5, 英和コンピューター用語辞典, RP

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スリープ・モード</reb>

大辞林　第四版; 新明解国語辞典　第八版

???

I liked it the way it was.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>cutting into wedges (esp. potatoes)</gloss>
+<gloss>cutting food into wedges (esp. potatoes)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>cutting food into wedges (esp. potatoes)</gloss>
+<gloss>cutting into wedges (esp. potatoes)</gloss>

Not seeing much golf. Examples?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウェッジ・カット</reb>

Something to note is wedge cut fries are usually called "steak fries", at least in America. May be wasei.

Also, I see a lot of golf results.

0 n-grams.

WWW hits are most for the potato sense.
Not sure about this one as an entry.

@@ -9 +9,6 @@
-<gloss>wedge cut</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">wedge cut</lsource>
+<gloss>cutting food into wedges (esp. potatoes)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>wedge cut (hairstyle)</gloss>

Yes, too obscure.

Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───┬───────╮
│ アイランドカー │ 5 │100.0% │ hmmmmm
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───┴───────╯

The "island" itself is not the problem. 
I also have the reference in question, but apart from that I can't find anything about "island cars" in traffic control.
Neither in English nor in Japanese. It has zero hits in the google ngrams and NINJAL corpora. 
Not in the automobile industry glossary either.

I saw a handful of direct hits for "アイランドカー" in the NDL, but I can't confirm whether these actually relate to what's described in the reference.
On top of that it indicates that it's a loanword, but, as mentioned above, I can't find any credit for this in English either.

This seems too obscure.
If there was a context or some form of media where this word was encountered with that meaning, it would greatly help if it were provided.

https://www.goo-net.com/knowledge/14884/

"アイランドとは、英語で島の意味。自動車関連の用語としては、高速道路で料金所が設置された場所など、路面より高く盛り上がった部分を指してアイランドと呼ぶことがある。また、路面より高く盛り上がった施設が道路上に設けられており、安全島や中央島などとも呼ばれる。"

0 n-grams. WWW images mostly show cars on islands, etc.

I really can't confirm this. It's probably best not included.

日本語辞典 (現代国語、外来語)

◆アイランド‐カー
アイランド‐カー《外》
［island (島) car］交通整理のための特殊自動車．交差点の中央に止めて監視所も兼ねる．〈現〉

アラームクロック	22262
目覚まし時計	494799
JWN

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アラーム・クロック</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1604940">目覚まし時計</xref>

https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/アラームクロック/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_media

Usually two words.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ニュース・メディア</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>newsmedia</gloss>
+<gloss>news media</gloss>

GG5, RP
ニュースメディア	9349

gg5, koj, nikk
河身	268

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>river-course</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>(river) channel</gloss>

NEW斎藤和英大辞典; 研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

gg5, daijr/s

nikk, eij, reverso
諸州	14,586

gg5, daijr, koj

KOD追加語彙, daijs

KOD追加語彙, daijs

daijs, jawiki
デンタルインプラント	4,860

daijs, RP, eij
歯科インプラント	44,257

gg5, daijr
人口歯根	2,683

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatsuya_Nakadai
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/仲代達矢

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Nakadai Tatsuya (1932.12-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tatsuya Nakadai (1932.12.13-2025.11.8; actor)</gloss>

Moving

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2867888</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ＵＮＥＦ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +10,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>
+<gloss>United Nations Emergency Force</gloss>

https://ec-watanabe.shop/glossary/ippan/u/0069.html?PageSpeed=noscript&srsltid=AfmBOood91XhADjK1XItvlNGVx2N6D2mn8jag-lRQs3RuMoY2p3XFWp8

国連緊急軍	380

Moving

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2867887</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -8,0 +8 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

With 3k+ in the ngrams I don't think it can be ignored. Yes, mostly in names. I think it should be searchable somewhere, so maybe it can be lurking in the names dictionary.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2867867</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,3 +10,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2581920">養蜂箱</xref>
-<gloss>beehive</gloss>
+<pos>&unc;</pos>
+<gloss>Beehive</gloss>

It's used in names and transcriptions but it doesn't appear to be used as a noun meaning "beehive". I don't think it should be an entry.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ビーハイブ
ビーハイブ	2654
ビーハイヴ	864
WWW images

Not really used much in Japanese for beehives, but too many hits to ignore.