I'd keep livelihood. It's in the JEs.

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>livelihood</gloss>

https://sknihongo.com/en/jisho/暮らし-kurashi/
"暮らし has a more everyday connotation, related to daily life, habits, and how someone lives. For example, 田舎暮らし (いなかぐらし) means "country living""

These glosses probably separate it better from other distinct terms like 生活?

Also "livelihood" probably aligns better with 生活, no?

(More practical, objective sounding)
楽な生活をしたい。I want to live a manageable life.
田舎の生活 Life in the country
(Subjective sounding)
楽な暮らしをしたい。I want to live a comfortable life. 
田舎暮らし Country living (more focus on habits, experience, etc)

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>lifestyle</gloss>
@@ -29 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>livelihood</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>day-to-day life</gloss>

Fair enough.

e.g. for looking up ぐらし from 借りぐらし

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぐらし</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 唯々　　 │    23,369 │  2.0% │Iwakoku, Daijr; [rK]
│ 只々　　 │    17,303 │  1.5% │Iwakoku, Daijr; [rK]
│ 只只　　 │     2,702 │  0.2% │[sK]
│ 唯唯　　 │     2,087 │  0.2% │[sK]
│ ただただ │ 1,136,201 │ 96.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@
+<keb>唯々</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,3 +14 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>唯々</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, luminous, daij

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<s_inf>emphatic modifier</s_inf>
+<s_inf>emphatic form of ただ</s_inf>
@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+<gloss>completely</gloss>
+<gloss>utterly</gloss>
+<gloss>really</gloss>
+<gloss>simply</gloss>

Remove uk tags
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

OK, hiding it.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

https://odjl.net/jisho.html?q={"id":"564"}
https://www.jlect.com/search.php?r=がじゅまる&l=all&group=words
https://kotobank.jp/word/がじゆまる-3148467#w-1521727

Oukoku has the kanji for がじゅまる as well, and my version of nipponica does list them.
None of the kokugos have kanji for がじまる, though JLect's Japonic Languages and Dialects Database has them.
All 榕樹 hits in NINJAL corpora are read ようじゅ.
I think it could stay [rK] with a [gikun] tag for the readings, but [sK]ing it is probably best.

I quite agree with splitting off ようじゅ. 
I really wonder, though, about keeping 榕樹 in this entry. The JEs, Daijirin, Daijisen, Nikkoku, Nipponica, etc. only have it in kana. Koj seems to the only reference with kanji. At best it's a gikun reading, but I think it could be omitted, or at least hidden.

Not [uk] for ようじゅ. Splitting it out.
I don't think がじまる should be hidden.
I don't think the note is needed.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -7,6 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>がじゅまる</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ようじゅ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +13,3 @@
+<reb>がじゅまる</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -19 +17 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -28 +25,0 @@
-<s_inf>がじゅまる is originally from Okinawa dialect</s_inf>
@@ -31,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>curtain fig</gloss>

Most of my small kokugos don't have this tagged as [vs]. I think it's okay to drop.

〈掛（け）／かけ／カケ〉〈接（ぎ）／矧（ぎ）／はぎ／ハギ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 掛け接ぎ │    132 │  0.9% │ - rK
│ 掛けはぎ │     29 │  0.2% │
│ 掛け矧ぎ │      0 │  0.0% │ - rK (iwakoku, daijr, etc.)
│ かけはぎ │ 14,100 │ 93.8% │
│ カケハギ │    778 │  5.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掛け矧ぎ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +21 @@
-<keb>掛け接</keb>
+<keb>掛矧ぎ</keb>
@@ -20,5 +25 @@
-<keb>掛け矧ぎ</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>掛矧ぎ</keb>
+<keb>掛け接</keb>
@@ -32 +32,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

掛け接	0	0.0%
掛け接ぎ	132	0.9%
掛接ぎ	0	0.0%
掛け矧ぎ	0	0.0%
掛矧ぎ	0	0.0%
かけはぎ	14100	98.9%
掛けはぎ	29	0.2%
かけはぎする	47
かけはぎした	31
かけはぎして	24

GG5 has "～する" but it hardly rates.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>掛け接</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>掛けはぎ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +13,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掛け接</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +21 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,3 +24,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>掛けはぎ</keb>
@@ -27,0 +32,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Mazegaki addition (maze3)
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掛けはぎ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>

gg5, prog, chujiten
本給	13,597		
基本給	117,000

@@ -16 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>basic or regular salary</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1756680">基本給</xref>
+<gloss>base salary</gloss>
+<gloss>basic salary</gloss>
+<gloss>base pay</gloss>
+<gloss>basic pay</gloss>

I don't think we need the plural form.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>continua</gloss>

13 sKs!

〈ある／有る／在る〉〈こと／事〉〈ない／無い〉〈こと／事〉
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ある事ない事　　 │ 10,395 │ 16.6% │
│ あること無いこと │  4,489 │  7.2% │ [sK]
│ ある事無い事　　 │  2,335 │  3.7% │ [sK]
│ 有ること無いこと │  2,303 │  3.7% │ [sK]
│ 有る事無い事　　 │  1,262 │  2.0% │ daijs, meikyo, etc. ; [rK]
│ あることない事　 │    861 │  1.4% │ [sK]
│ あること無い事　 │    714 │  1.1% │ [sK]
│ ある事無いこと　 │    252 │  0.4% │ add; [sK]
│ ある事ないこと　 │    216 │  0.3% │ add; [sK]
│ 有る事無いこと　 │    154 │  0.2% │ add; [sK]
│ 在ること無いこと │     84 │  0.1% │ add; [sK]
│ 在る事無い事　　 │     77 │  0.1% │ shinsen; add; [sK]
│ 有ること無い事　 │     66 │  0.1% │ add; [sK]
│ 有ることないこと │     53 │  0.1% │ add; [sK]
│ 有る事ない事　　 │     34 │  0.1% │ add; [sK]
│ 在ることないこと │      0 │  0.0% │ /
│ 有る事ないこと　 │      0 │  0.0% │ /
│ 在る事ないこと　 │      0 │  0.0% │ /
│ 在る事無いこと　 │      0 │  0.0% │ / 
│ 有ることない事　 │      0 │  0.0% │ /
│ 在ることない事　 │      0 │  0.0% │ /
│ 在る事ない事　　 │      0 │  0.0% │ /
│ 在ること無い事　 │      0 │  0.0% │ /
│ あることないこと │ 39,412 │ 62.9% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I think all the mazegaki (apart from the most common one) can be hidden, and the full kanji form can be [rK]'d.
Much cleaner

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>有る事無い事</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,3 +21 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>有る事無い事</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +25 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +29,33 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ある事無いこと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ある事ないこと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>有る事無いこと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>在ること無いこと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>在る事無い事</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>有ること無い事</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>有ることないこと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>有る事ない事</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think that's a good cutoff point.

you've got all of them listed below
decide where to draw the line

I don't think we should include this many 
surface forms when they're not more 
common.

Remove uk tags
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -26 +24,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

There's another reason for retaining the [uk] tags. In the text-glossing function in WWWJDIC (and possibly other apps), the [uk] tag is used to identify kana-only entries where the kana form is used to assist the parsing of text. If the [uk] is removed from entries where all the kanji forms are tagged as [sK], this function would have to be extended to include this extra analysis.  While not impossible, it's more work just to keep the system going. Easier to leave the [uk] tags as a signal, as they have been for many years.
I'll close this now, leaving the [uk] n place.

I get that they are different tagsets.
And frankly I'm not avid for having these [uk] tags removed, but I think for consistency's sake it should be decided whether they stay or not.
Since per the github issue by parfait it seemed to me they would no longer stay.

I see them as independent tagsets. Sure, if all the kanji forms are [sK] then the [uk] is automatic, but the tagging is done on different, albeit related, criteria.
FWIW, in WWWJDIC I drop the [uk] tag when all the kanji forms are [sK].

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/152

I didn't notice them in the ないといけない entry, I think they should be removed too.
We should stay consistent with the issue solutions, there's really no point in having them if the user doesn't see any kanji forms and the developers manage their end as well.
And if you e.g. search for ないと on sites like jisho it just looks odd, having a note "usually only in kana" with no kanji form visible.
https://four.jisho.org/search?keyword=無いと

Very tempted to add a はるひ/はるび entry.

daij, koj

はるひ/はるび is archaic. We could split it out into an [arch] entry but it's probably not needed.

@@ -10,6 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>はるひ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>はるび</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +13,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>spring sun</gloss>

koj, daij

merge

@@ -10,0 +10,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はるひ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はるび</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>spring sunlight</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>curling inwards (esp. the tips of one's hair)</gloss>
+<gloss>curling inwards (esp. of the tips of one's hair)</gloss>

内巻きが	247

Barely a noun.

内巻きボブ	290	92.1%
内巻きのボブ	25	7.9%

内巻きの	964	  

Some cherry-picked adj-f examples (any adj-no has lower ngrams than all of these):
内巻き	18817	  
内巻きカール	2538	  
内巻きパーマ	426	  
内巻きボブ	290	  
内巻きスタイル	222	  
内巻きヘア	213	  
内巻きエアロ	155 <- this is a car  
内巻きブロー	134


内巻きカール	2538	95.9%
内巻きのカール	47	1.8%
内巻カール	61	2.3%
内巻のカール	0	0.0%

内巻きに	5211	94.6%
内巻に	299	5.4%

Encountered as "内巻きのボブ" (woman's hair style).  Google shows this is common enough, but not nearly as common as adj-f.

Omitting き does not seem well-advised. Google will do the "did you mean?..." thing.  but it is in daijs. Maybe [rK]?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

daijr daijs
Google (relative kanji frequency)

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>clipping (audio)</gloss>
+<gloss>clipping (of audio)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vowel_breaking

I think there are only two senses here. "Crackling" is presumably sense 1 but I don't think it's a great gloss.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -17,4 +19 @@
-<gloss>crackling (noise)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -22 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>breaking</gloss>
+<gloss>(vowel) breaking</gloss>
+<gloss>vowel fracture</gloss>

OK, let it go.

i can't speak for the japanese term, but they're different in english.

餌やり　 78,886  56.9% 
餌遣り　    440   0.3% -rK
エサ遣り     97   0.1% -sK
えさやり 20,370  14.7% 
エサやり 38,771  28.0%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,2 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>餌やり</re_restr>
-<re_restr>餌遣り</re_restr>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<re_restr>エサ遣り</re_restr>
+<re_nokanji/>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Unidic
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/aran-wish/e/7883840d489a2206347115c19792f001 (caption on 4th image)

Almost "uk"

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>餌遣り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>エサ遣り</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15,2 @@
+<re_restr>餌やり</re_restr>
+<re_restr>餌遣り</re_restr>
@@ -12 +20 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_restr>エサ遣り</re_restr>
@@ -16,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>provisioning</gloss>

力学 is tagged as [physics].

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>

eij
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/連続体力学

https://kotobank.jp/word/財布の紐を緩める-508391#w-508391

daijs

財布の紐を緩める	1601	86.2%
財布のひもを緩める	256	13.8%

GG5: すそ上げ・ウエスト直し・かけはぎ等洋服のお直し承ります． We do hemming, waist  adjustments, and invisible mending.

Remarkably common. I don't think "tailoring" really fits.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<reb>ようふくのおなおし</reb>
+<reb>ようふくおなおし</reb>
@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1305590">仕立て直し</xref>
-<gloss>alteration (esp. of Western clothing)</gloss>
+<gloss>clothing alteration (esp. Western clothing)</gloss>
@@ -19 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>tailoring (usu. minor modifications)</gloss>

洋服お直し 106732
洋服直し 36345
洋服のリフォーム 9309 
ママのリフォーム 3097

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=alteration
〔衣服の〕寸法直し、裾上げ
寸法直し	11509	6.7%
仕立て直し	31500　<- these are high-end tailoring services, often kimono
裾上げ	160006	93.3% <- this is hemming specifically

Chatgpt:
洋服お直し mainly means “clothing alterations,” but functionally covers most small machine-sewn fabric repairs.
Think of them as general sewing specialists, excluding traditional garments and leather.

Was looking for what I needed to search for to get curtains shortened.  

Not only clothes, but also where you'd go to get a backpack fixed, or anything you'd fix with a sewing machine (no kimonos).  It dominates any other term I can find for this service.

"Tailoring" is maybe a bit broad, but for E->J it would be super useful for this to come up on a search for "tailor".

xref rationale at 仕立て直し, which I will also edit shortly.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC
>> 男子中学生（Danshi Chūgakusei）の略。
https://dic.pixiv.net/a/DC
>> 「男子中学生（Danshi Chugakusei）」の略。「女子高生＝JK」の派生とされる。

I don't think we need "DC" as a gloss on the "data centre" sense. It's not commonly used in English. I also think we can omit spelling variants here.
Added sense.

@@ -26,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>data centre</gloss>
-<gloss>DC</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +32,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<s_inf>from "danshi chūgakusei"（男子中学生）</s_inf>
+<gloss>male junior high school student</gloss>

Closing

Reopen.

GG5 and other JEs for sense 1.

"DC" is obviously used in many contexts in English, but it is not used as widely in Japanese. The main use is for direct current, as in sense 1. I can see a couple of computing word lists showing it for "data centre", and the District of Columbia usage occasionally crops up, but I cannot find cases of it being used for the others proposed here.
I'm going to trim this back, then reopen it in case anyone wants to contribute examples of it being used *in Japanese* for the other proposed senses.

@@ -23,26 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2850806">コロンビア特別区</xref>
-<gloss>District of Columbia</gloss>
-<gloss>DC</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1477740">発展途上国</xref>
-<gloss>developing country</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1334820">十進分類法</xref>
-<gloss>decimal classification</gloss>
-<gloss>Dewey (decimal) classification</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2467700">ダークチェンジ</xref>
-<gloss>dark change</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>draft card</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -57,8 +31,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2867875">発達ケア</xref>
-<gloss>development care</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2439940">樹状細胞</xref>
-<field>&biol;</field>
-<gloss>dendritic cell</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2850806">コロンビア特別区</xref>
+<gloss>District of Columbia</gloss>
@@ -66,5 +33,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1983940">確定拠出年金</xref>
-<gloss>defined contribution pension plan</gloss>

daijs
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/研修医
>> 2018年3月以前は、現在の研修医を「前期（初期）研修医」、専攻医を「後期研修医」（病院によっては専修医、修練医などとも）と呼んでいた。

Like 後期研修医, no longer used. Officially renamed to 専攻医 in 2018.

https://mecstation.jp/doctorsstudy/column/enhancement/42/
>> 2018（平成30）年4月から新専門医制度が施行され、「後期研修医」という呼び方はなくなりました。
https://clius.jp/mag/2021/07/06/koki-kensyuui-about/
>> 「研修医＝初期研修医または後期研修医」とされてきましたが、実は、2018年4月からスタートした「新専門医制度」によって、「後期研修医」という呼び名の代わりに「専攻医」という言葉が使われることになっています。
後期研修医	6,656

財布の紐	59563
財布のひも	12462
GG5, 中辞典

We already have 財布の紐を握る and 財布の紐を締める, which are far less common.

OK

wisdom

I think "to the last man" is too context-dependent.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>to the last man</gloss>
+<gloss>fiercely</gloss>
+<gloss>with full resolve</gloss>

ここを先途	1069
此処を先途	60
ここを先途と	1002	  
ここを先途とばかり	214	  
ここを先途とばかりに	85	  
ここを先途と鞭	20	 
GG5: ここを先途と戦う fight desperately (to the last man); put up a stubborn resistance.

Something like this? I'll close and reopen.

@@ -5 +5,5 @@
-<keb>此処を先途</keb>
+<keb>ここを先途と</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>此処を先途と</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8 +12 @@
-<reb>ここをせんど</reb>
+<reb>ここをせんどと</reb>
@@ -11,2 +15,5 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>acting fervently at a pivotal moment (to decide success, victory, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>fervently</gloss>
+<gloss>desperately</gloss>
+<gloss>to the last man</gloss>

Realized I should update with kanji for ここ. Apologies for multiple edits.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>ここを先途</keb>
+<keb>此処を先途</keb>

jawiki, RP, eij
ソフトロック	21,015

gg5, daijr

過剰包装 29,094

daijs, gg5

仕事先 214,783